迪玛萨族的亲属称谓:藏缅地区的代际对等

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Anthropological Linguistics Pub Date : 2019-09-13 DOI:10.1353/anl.2019.0005

Pascal Bouchery, Monali Longmailai

{"title":"迪玛萨族的亲属称谓:藏缅地区的代际对等","authors":"Pascal Bouchery, Monali Longmailai","doi":"10.1353/anl.2019.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Most languages of the Bodo-Garo cluster of the Tibeto-Burman family exhibit kinship terminologies that are built upon the principle of seniority and incorporate terminological equivalences between agnatic kin of alternate generations. Interestingly, the latter feature does not appear to be shared by any other language of the Sino-Tibetan family. To find a similar intricate pattern of self-reciprocity between consanguineal relatives of different generations, one has to turn to the Munda systems of Central India (whose languages belong to the Austroasiatic family); this raises several problems of interpretation. Dimasa is chosen here as a model, as it most clearly exhibits the general principles underlying kin classification in Bodo-Garo languages.","PeriodicalId":35350,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/anl.2019.0005","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Kinship Terminology of the Dimasa: Alternate Generation Equivalence in the Tibeto-Burman Area\",\"authors\":\"Pascal Bouchery, Monali Longmailai\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/anl.2019.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Most languages of the Bodo-Garo cluster of the Tibeto-Burman family exhibit kinship terminologies that are built upon the principle of seniority and incorporate terminological equivalences between agnatic kin of alternate generations. Interestingly, the latter feature does not appear to be shared by any other language of the Sino-Tibetan family. To find a similar intricate pattern of self-reciprocity between consanguineal relatives of different generations, one has to turn to the Munda systems of Central India (whose languages belong to the Austroasiatic family); this raises several problems of interpretation. Dimasa is chosen here as a model, as it most clearly exhibits the general principles underlying kin classification in Bodo-Garo languages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropological Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/anl.2019.0005\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropological Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/anl.2019.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/anl.2019.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要：台伯语族博多-加罗语族的大多数语言都表现出基于辈分原则的亲属术语，并包含了隔代亲属之间的术语对等。有趣的是，后一个特征似乎没有被汉藏语系的任何其他语言所共享。为了在不同世代的血亲之间找到类似的复杂的自我互惠模式，人们必须求助于中印度的蒙达语系统（其语言属于澳大利亚语族）；这就提出了几个解释问题。Dimasa在这里被选为一个模型，因为它最清楚地展示了博多-加罗语言亲属分类的基本原则。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Kinship Terminology of the Dimasa: Alternate Generation Equivalence in the Tibeto-Burman Area

Abstract:Most languages of the Bodo-Garo cluster of the Tibeto-Burman family exhibit kinship terminologies that are built upon the principle of seniority and incorporate terminological equivalences between agnatic kin of alternate generations. Interestingly, the latter feature does not appear to be shared by any other language of the Sino-Tibetan family. To find a similar intricate pattern of self-reciprocity between consanguineal relatives of different generations, one has to turn to the Munda systems of Central India (whose languages belong to the Austroasiatic family); this raises several problems of interpretation. Dimasa is chosen here as a model, as it most clearly exhibits the general principles underlying kin classification in Bodo-Garo languages.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Anthropological Linguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Anthropological Linguistics, a quarterly journal founded in 1959, provides a forum for the full range of scholarly study of the languages and cultures of the peoples of the world, especially the native peoples of the Americas. Embracing the field of language and culture broadly defined, the editors welcome articles and research reports addressing cultural, historical, and philological aspects of linguistic study, including analyses of texts and discourse; studies of semantic systems and cultural classifications; onomastic studies; ethnohistorical papers that draw significantly on linguistic data; studies of linguistic prehistory and genetic classification.