{"title":"1995-2017年巴西自由裁量财政政策:分解与演变","authors":"Amanda Santos de Oliveira Pontes, A. Lourenço","doi":"10.22201/fe.01851667p.2020.313.76065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEste articulo tiene como objetivo evaluar la orientacion general (expansionista o contraccionista) del componente discrecional de la politica fiscal brasilena en el periodo 1995-2017, asi como verificar su posicion respecto al ciclo economico (prociclica o anticiclica). Con este fin, proponemos y aplicamos una nueva metodologia para separar el impulso fiscal discrecional de la parte del resultado fiscal que se obtiene de la activacion de los estabilizadores fiscales automaticos. Concluimos que la politica fiscal: 1) genero una posicion mayormente prociclica (desestabilizadora) de su componente discrecional, lo que la llevo a amplificar en lugar de amortiguar los ciclos economicos; 2) no pudo evitar que la relacion deuda publica/PIB entrase en una trayectoria insostenible al final del periodo. Se hacen algunas sugerencias para mejorar su rendimiento. DISCRETIONARY FISCAL POLICY IN BRAZIL, 1995-2017: DECOMPOSITION AND EVOLUTIONABSTRACTThis article aims to evaluate the general (expansionist or contractionist) orientation of the discretionary component of Brazilian fiscal policy in the period 1995-2017, as well as to verify its position in relation to the economic cycle (procyclical or anticyclical). To this end, it proposes and applies a new methodology to separate the discretionary fiscal impulse from the part of the fiscal result arising from the operation of automatic fiscal stabilizers. It concludes that fiscal policy: 1) generated a mostly procyclical (destabilizing) position of its discretionary component, leading it to amplify rather than dampen economic cycles; 2) failed to prevent the public debt/GDP ratio from entering the unsustainable path at the end of the period. Suggestions are made to improve its performance. EnglishEste articulo tiene como objetivo evaluar la orientacion general (expansionista o contraccionista) del componente discrecional de la politica fiscal brasilena en el periodo 1995-2017, asi como verificar su posicion respecto al ciclo economico (prociclica o anticiclica). Con este fin, proponemos y aplicamos una nueva metodologia para separar el impulso fiscal discrecional de la parte del resultado fiscal que se obtiene de la activacion de los estabilizadores fiscales automaticos. Concluimos que la politica fiscal: 1) genero una posicion mayormente prociclica (desestabilizadora) de su componente discrecional, lo que la llevo a amplificar en lugar de amortiguar los ciclos economicos; 2) no pudo evitar que la relacion deuda publica/PIB entrase en una trayectoria insostenible al final del periodo. Se hacen algunas sugerencias para mejorar su rendimiento. DISCRETIONARY FISCAL POLICY IN BRAZIL, 1995-2017: DECOMPOSITION AND EVOLUTIONABSTRACTThis article aims to evaluate the general (expansionist or contractionist) orientation of the discretionary component of Brazilian fiscal policy in the period 1995-2017, as well as to verify its position in relation to the economic cycle (procyclic or anticyclic). To this end, it proposes and applies a new methodology to separate the discretionary fiscal impulse from the part of the fiscal result arising from the operation of automatic fiscal stabilizers. It concludes that fiscal policy: 1) generated a mostly procyclical (destabilizing) position of its discretionary component, leading it to amplify rather than dampen economic cycles; 2) failed to prevent the public debt/GDP ratio from entering the unsustainable path at the end of the period. Suggestions are made to improve its performance.","PeriodicalId":44170,"journal":{"name":"Investigacion Economica","volume":"79 1","pages":"51-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"POLÍTICA FISCAL DISCRECIONAL EN BRASIL, 1995-2017: DESCOMPOSICIÓN Y EVOLUCIÓN\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Santos de Oliveira Pontes, A. Lourenço\",\"doi\":\"10.22201/fe.01851667p.2020.313.76065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolEste articulo tiene como objetivo evaluar la orientacion general (expansionista o contraccionista) del componente discrecional de la politica fiscal brasilena en el periodo 1995-2017, asi como verificar su posicion respecto al ciclo economico (prociclica o anticiclica). Con este fin, proponemos y aplicamos una nueva metodologia para separar el impulso fiscal discrecional de la parte del resultado fiscal que se obtiene de la activacion de los estabilizadores fiscales automaticos. Concluimos que la politica fiscal: 1) genero una posicion mayormente prociclica (desestabilizadora) de su componente discrecional, lo que la llevo a amplificar en lugar de amortiguar los ciclos economicos; 2) no pudo evitar que la relacion deuda publica/PIB entrase en una trayectoria insostenible al final del periodo. Se hacen algunas sugerencias para mejorar su rendimiento. DISCRETIONARY FISCAL POLICY IN BRAZIL, 1995-2017: DECOMPOSITION AND EVOLUTIONABSTRACTThis article aims to evaluate the general (expansionist or contractionist) orientation of the discretionary component of Brazilian fiscal policy in the period 1995-2017, as well as to verify its position in relation to the economic cycle (procyclical or anticyclical). To this end, it proposes and applies a new methodology to separate the discretionary fiscal impulse from the part of the fiscal result arising from the operation of automatic fiscal stabilizers. It concludes that fiscal policy: 1) generated a mostly procyclical (destabilizing) position of its discretionary component, leading it to amplify rather than dampen economic cycles; 2) failed to prevent the public debt/GDP ratio from entering the unsustainable path at the end of the period. Suggestions are made to improve its performance. EnglishEste articulo tiene como objetivo evaluar la orientacion general (expansionista o contraccionista) del componente discrecional de la politica fiscal brasilena en el periodo 1995-2017, asi como verificar su posicion respecto al ciclo economico (prociclica o anticiclica). Con este fin, proponemos y aplicamos una nueva metodologia para separar el impulso fiscal discrecional de la parte del resultado fiscal que se obtiene de la activacion de los estabilizadores fiscales automaticos. Concluimos que la politica fiscal: 1) genero una posicion mayormente prociclica (desestabilizadora) de su componente discrecional, lo que la llevo a amplificar en lugar de amortiguar los ciclos economicos; 2) no pudo evitar que la relacion deuda publica/PIB entrase en una trayectoria insostenible al final del periodo. Se hacen algunas sugerencias para mejorar su rendimiento. DISCRETIONARY FISCAL POLICY IN BRAZIL, 1995-2017: DECOMPOSITION AND EVOLUTIONABSTRACTThis article aims to evaluate the general (expansionist or contractionist) orientation of the discretionary component of Brazilian fiscal policy in the period 1995-2017, as well as to verify its position in relation to the economic cycle (procyclic or anticyclic). To this end, it proposes and applies a new methodology to separate the discretionary fiscal impulse from the part of the fiscal result arising from the operation of automatic fiscal stabilizers. It concludes that fiscal policy: 1) generated a mostly procyclical (destabilizing) position of its discretionary component, leading it to amplify rather than dampen economic cycles; 2) failed to prevent the public debt/GDP ratio from entering the unsustainable path at the end of the period. Suggestions are made to improve its performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigacion Economica\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"51-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigacion Economica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22201/fe.01851667p.2020.313.76065\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigacion Economica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/fe.01851667p.2020.313.76065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文旨在评估1995-2017年巴西财政政策的可自由支配部分的总体方向(扩张主义或收缩主义),并验证其对经济周期(顺周期或预期)的立场。为此,我们提出并应用了一种新的方法,将可自由支配的财政冲动与激活自动财政稳定器所获得的部分财政结果分开。我们的结论是:1)财政政策在其自由裁量成分中产生了一种主要是顺周期(破坏稳定)的立场,导致其放大而不是抑制经济周期;2)在这一时期结束时,它未能阻止公共债务/ gdp比率进入不可持续的轨道。提出了一些提高性能的建议。财政DISCRETIONARY POLICY IN巴西,1995-2017:DECOMPOSITION AND EVOLUTIONABSTRACTThis条旨在评价秘书长(expansionist or contractionist) orientation of the DISCRETIONARY component of POLICY IN the period 1995-2017财政Brazilian, as well as to verify its定位有关经济周期(procyclical or anticyclical)。为此目的,它提出并应用了一种新的方法,将自由支配的财政冲动与自动财政稳定器操作产生的财政结果部分分开。它的结论是,财政政策:1)产生了一种主要是顺周期的(破坏稳定的)财政政策,导致其放大而不是削弱经济周期;2)未能防止政府债务/国内生产总值比率在这一时期结束时走上不可持续的道路。建议是为了提高它的性能。本文旨在评估1995-2017年巴西财政政策的可自由支配部分的总体方向(扩张主义或收缩主义),并验证其对经济周期(顺周期或预期)的立场。为此,我们提出并应用了一种新的方法,将可自由支配的财政冲动与激活自动财政稳定器所获得的部分财政结果分开。我们的结论是:1)财政政策在其自由裁量成分中产生了一种主要是顺周期(破坏稳定)的立场,导致其放大而不是抑制经济周期;2)在这一时期结束时,它未能阻止公共债务/ gdp比率进入不可持续的轨道。提出了一些提高性能的建议。财政DISCRETIONARY POLICY IN巴西,1995-2017:DECOMPOSITION AND EVOLUTIONABSTRACTThis条旨在评价秘书长(expansionist or contractionist) orientation of the DISCRETIONARY component of POLICY IN the period 1995-2017财政Brazilian, as well as to verify its定位有关经济周期(procyclic or anticyclic)。为此目的,它提出并应用了一种新的方法,将自由支配的财政冲动与自动财政稳定器操作产生的财政结果部分分开。它的结论是,财政政策:1)产生了一种主要是顺周期的(破坏稳定的)财政政策,导致其放大而不是削弱经济周期;2)未能防止政府债务/国内生产总值比率在这一时期结束时走上不可持续的道路。建议是为了提高它的性能。
POLÍTICA FISCAL DISCRECIONAL EN BRASIL, 1995-2017: DESCOMPOSICIÓN Y EVOLUCIÓN
espanolEste articulo tiene como objetivo evaluar la orientacion general (expansionista o contraccionista) del componente discrecional de la politica fiscal brasilena en el periodo 1995-2017, asi como verificar su posicion respecto al ciclo economico (prociclica o anticiclica). Con este fin, proponemos y aplicamos una nueva metodologia para separar el impulso fiscal discrecional de la parte del resultado fiscal que se obtiene de la activacion de los estabilizadores fiscales automaticos. Concluimos que la politica fiscal: 1) genero una posicion mayormente prociclica (desestabilizadora) de su componente discrecional, lo que la llevo a amplificar en lugar de amortiguar los ciclos economicos; 2) no pudo evitar que la relacion deuda publica/PIB entrase en una trayectoria insostenible al final del periodo. Se hacen algunas sugerencias para mejorar su rendimiento. DISCRETIONARY FISCAL POLICY IN BRAZIL, 1995-2017: DECOMPOSITION AND EVOLUTIONABSTRACTThis article aims to evaluate the general (expansionist or contractionist) orientation of the discretionary component of Brazilian fiscal policy in the period 1995-2017, as well as to verify its position in relation to the economic cycle (procyclical or anticyclical). To this end, it proposes and applies a new methodology to separate the discretionary fiscal impulse from the part of the fiscal result arising from the operation of automatic fiscal stabilizers. It concludes that fiscal policy: 1) generated a mostly procyclical (destabilizing) position of its discretionary component, leading it to amplify rather than dampen economic cycles; 2) failed to prevent the public debt/GDP ratio from entering the unsustainable path at the end of the period. Suggestions are made to improve its performance. EnglishEste articulo tiene como objetivo evaluar la orientacion general (expansionista o contraccionista) del componente discrecional de la politica fiscal brasilena en el periodo 1995-2017, asi como verificar su posicion respecto al ciclo economico (prociclica o anticiclica). Con este fin, proponemos y aplicamos una nueva metodologia para separar el impulso fiscal discrecional de la parte del resultado fiscal que se obtiene de la activacion de los estabilizadores fiscales automaticos. Concluimos que la politica fiscal: 1) genero una posicion mayormente prociclica (desestabilizadora) de su componente discrecional, lo que la llevo a amplificar en lugar de amortiguar los ciclos economicos; 2) no pudo evitar que la relacion deuda publica/PIB entrase en una trayectoria insostenible al final del periodo. Se hacen algunas sugerencias para mejorar su rendimiento. DISCRETIONARY FISCAL POLICY IN BRAZIL, 1995-2017: DECOMPOSITION AND EVOLUTIONABSTRACTThis article aims to evaluate the general (expansionist or contractionist) orientation of the discretionary component of Brazilian fiscal policy in the period 1995-2017, as well as to verify its position in relation to the economic cycle (procyclic or anticyclic). To this end, it proposes and applies a new methodology to separate the discretionary fiscal impulse from the part of the fiscal result arising from the operation of automatic fiscal stabilizers. It concludes that fiscal policy: 1) generated a mostly procyclical (destabilizing) position of its discretionary component, leading it to amplify rather than dampen economic cycles; 2) failed to prevent the public debt/GDP ratio from entering the unsustainable path at the end of the period. Suggestions are made to improve its performance.
期刊介绍:
It is a specialized journal, bilingual (Spanish and English), plural and critical, which accepts and publishes scientific research articles in national and international economy. It is considered a public good that belongs to the University and society. Its vocation is to analyze the evolution of the theoretical and practical economics. In its pages the paradigms of economics, history of economic thought, the theories and debates about economic policy and its consequences, the diagnosis of the Mexican economy, the economic development of Latin America and the problems spread the world economy in general. It is a journal that does not discriminate plural none paradigm; theoretical orientation is unorthodox for epistemological reasons, not ideological preferences.