西方女性主义、世俗主义与宗教之争——宗教与世俗女性的话语另类

IF 0.4 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Line Nyhagen
{"title":"西方女性主义、世俗主义与宗教之争——宗教与世俗女性的话语另类","authors":"Line Nyhagen","doi":"10.18261/ISSN.1890-7008-2019-01-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Secular and religious women have a history of fighting for women’s rights and gender equality. Yet, contemporary feminist and women’s movements in the West are largely understood as secular, and as rejecting religion, and religion is often perceived as the antithesis of empowerment and emancipation. In this article I problematise the relationship between feminism, secularism and religion via a discussion of secular feminist views on women and religion, and religious women’s views on secular feminism. Bringing together previously separate strands of work, this article provides an original analysis of how both secular feminist women and non-feminist religious women engage in discursive articulations of Othering, constructing inferior subjects who are (dis-)placed outside the boundary of ‘women like us’. Such discursive representations, which are rooted in perceptions of feminism and religion as unitary and static, contribute to the construction and maintenance of sharp boundaries between secular and religious women, thus hindering the potential for dialogue and collaboration in support of women’s rights and gender equality.","PeriodicalId":43193,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Religion and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contestations of Feminism, Secularism and Religion in the West: The Discursive Othering of Religious and Secular Women\",\"authors\":\"Line Nyhagen\",\"doi\":\"10.18261/ISSN.1890-7008-2019-01-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Secular and religious women have a history of fighting for women’s rights and gender equality. Yet, contemporary feminist and women’s movements in the West are largely understood as secular, and as rejecting religion, and religion is often perceived as the antithesis of empowerment and emancipation. In this article I problematise the relationship between feminism, secularism and religion via a discussion of secular feminist views on women and religion, and religious women’s views on secular feminism. Bringing together previously separate strands of work, this article provides an original analysis of how both secular feminist women and non-feminist religious women engage in discursive articulations of Othering, constructing inferior subjects who are (dis-)placed outside the boundary of ‘women like us’. Such discursive representations, which are rooted in perceptions of feminism and religion as unitary and static, contribute to the construction and maintenance of sharp boundaries between secular and religious women, thus hindering the potential for dialogue and collaboration in support of women’s rights and gender equality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Journal of Religion and Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Journal of Religion and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.1890-7008-2019-01-01\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Religion and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.1890-7008-2019-01-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

世俗和宗教妇女有争取妇女权利和性别平等的历史。然而,西方的当代女权主义和妇女运动在很大程度上被理解为世俗的,拒绝宗教,宗教往往被视为赋权和解放的对立面。本文通过对世俗女性主义对女性和宗教的看法,以及宗教女性对世俗女权主义的看法的讨论,对女权主义、世俗主义和宗教之间的关系提出了质疑。这篇文章汇集了以前独立的作品,对世俗女权主义女性和非女权主义宗教女性如何参与对“他者”的话语阐述,构建了被置于“像我们这样的女性”边界之外的次等主体进行了独创性的分析。这种话语表述植根于对女权主义和宗教的单一和静态的看法,有助于在世俗和宗教妇女之间建立和维持尖锐的界限,从而阻碍了支持妇女权利和性别平等的对话与合作的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contestations of Feminism, Secularism and Religion in the West: The Discursive Othering of Religious and Secular Women
Secular and religious women have a history of fighting for women’s rights and gender equality. Yet, contemporary feminist and women’s movements in the West are largely understood as secular, and as rejecting religion, and religion is often perceived as the antithesis of empowerment and emancipation. In this article I problematise the relationship between feminism, secularism and religion via a discussion of secular feminist views on women and religion, and religious women’s views on secular feminism. Bringing together previously separate strands of work, this article provides an original analysis of how both secular feminist women and non-feminist religious women engage in discursive articulations of Othering, constructing inferior subjects who are (dis-)placed outside the boundary of ‘women like us’. Such discursive representations, which are rooted in perceptions of feminism and religion as unitary and static, contribute to the construction and maintenance of sharp boundaries between secular and religious women, thus hindering the potential for dialogue and collaboration in support of women’s rights and gender equality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信