P. Wurmann, Claudio Karsulovic, F. Sabugo, C. Hernández, Pedro Zamorano Soto, M. Mac-Namara
{"title":"巨细胞动脉炎累及颅内与颅外:15年回顾性队列分析","authors":"P. Wurmann, Claudio Karsulovic, F. Sabugo, C. Hernández, Pedro Zamorano Soto, M. Mac-Namara","doi":"10.2147/OARRR.S336925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a medium-large systemic vasculitis presenting primarily in patients over 50 years. It usually involves carotid artery branches, especially the temporary artery; nevertheless, it can affect the arterial wall of other large and medium arteries. 1 Cranial manifestations are the most frequent and usually define the study. 2 Extracranial involvement, otherwise frequent, can modify clinical and diagnostic features of the disease and may need higher levels of suspicion and other diagnostic strategies to address territories involved. 3 Reports regarding extracranial involvement in GCA vary depending on the diagnostic method used, ranging from 3% to 92%. Using angiography, the prevalence ranges from 20% to 67%; on the other hand, positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) shows 83% and 92%. 3,4 Up to 77% of these patients are asymptomatic and present isolated extracranial involvement. 5 The most frequently affected extracranial sites are the carotid, subclavian, axillary, and thoracic aorta, which can be complicated with dissection and aneurysms of the affected arteries. 4 There are some comparative series between cranial involvement patients and those with extracranial involvement; nevertheless, those do not include Latin American population-based cohorts, including clinical, imaging, and biopsy features. 6–8 In a 15-year retrospective cohort study including the","PeriodicalId":45545,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"97 - 101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cranial versus Extracranial Involvement in Giant Cell Arteritis: 15 Years Retrospective Cohort Analysis\",\"authors\":\"P. Wurmann, Claudio Karsulovic, F. Sabugo, C. Hernández, Pedro Zamorano Soto, M. Mac-Namara\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OARRR.S336925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a medium-large systemic vasculitis presenting primarily in patients over 50 years. It usually involves carotid artery branches, especially the temporary artery; nevertheless, it can affect the arterial wall of other large and medium arteries. 1 Cranial manifestations are the most frequent and usually define the study. 2 Extracranial involvement, otherwise frequent, can modify clinical and diagnostic features of the disease and may need higher levels of suspicion and other diagnostic strategies to address territories involved. 3 Reports regarding extracranial involvement in GCA vary depending on the diagnostic method used, ranging from 3% to 92%. Using angiography, the prevalence ranges from 20% to 67%; on the other hand, positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) shows 83% and 92%. 3,4 Up to 77% of these patients are asymptomatic and present isolated extracranial involvement. 5 The most frequently affected extracranial sites are the carotid, subclavian, axillary, and thoracic aorta, which can be complicated with dissection and aneurysms of the affected arteries. 4 There are some comparative series between cranial involvement patients and those with extracranial involvement; nevertheless, those do not include Latin American population-based cohorts, including clinical, imaging, and biopsy features. 6–8 In a 15-year retrospective cohort study including the\",\"PeriodicalId\":45545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"97 - 101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S336925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S336925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cranial versus Extracranial Involvement in Giant Cell Arteritis: 15 Years Retrospective Cohort Analysis
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a medium-large systemic vasculitis presenting primarily in patients over 50 years. It usually involves carotid artery branches, especially the temporary artery; nevertheless, it can affect the arterial wall of other large and medium arteries. 1 Cranial manifestations are the most frequent and usually define the study. 2 Extracranial involvement, otherwise frequent, can modify clinical and diagnostic features of the disease and may need higher levels of suspicion and other diagnostic strategies to address territories involved. 3 Reports regarding extracranial involvement in GCA vary depending on the diagnostic method used, ranging from 3% to 92%. Using angiography, the prevalence ranges from 20% to 67%; on the other hand, positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) shows 83% and 92%. 3,4 Up to 77% of these patients are asymptomatic and present isolated extracranial involvement. 5 The most frequently affected extracranial sites are the carotid, subclavian, axillary, and thoracic aorta, which can be complicated with dissection and aneurysms of the affected arteries. 4 There are some comparative series between cranial involvement patients and those with extracranial involvement; nevertheless, those do not include Latin American population-based cohorts, including clinical, imaging, and biopsy features. 6–8 In a 15-year retrospective cohort study including the