教育技术教师教育者的视角:小牛、冠军还是变革推动者?

Q1 Social Sciences
Jon M. Clausen, A. Borthwick, David W. Rutledge, B. Walker
{"title":"教育技术教师教育者的视角:小牛、冠军还是变革推动者?","authors":"Jon M. Clausen, A. Borthwick, David W. Rutledge, B. Walker","doi":"10.1080/21532974.2022.2137607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Teacher education programs struggle to infuse educational technology (edtec) throughout the curriculum. Edtec faculty can play several roles within the programmatic design of teacher education programs. The purpose of this study was to explore edtec faculty perspectives of technology infusion efforts within their preparation programs. Q methodology research design and factor analysis were used to examine data from Q sorts completed exclusively by edtec faculty members (N = 16). A Q set of 44 statements was used to explore their perspectives on value of technology for teaching and learning, confidence levels, educator preparation program design, and leadership support. Results revealed participants’ strong beliefs in the value of technology for teaching and learning, and their confidence in modeling technology integration. Participants loaded on two factors demonstrating that some held a broader view of educator preparation at their institutions and were more critical of programmatic structures and leadership support for candidate development. A question remains about the role of edtec faculty as they negotiate various opportunities and expectations within teacher education.","PeriodicalId":52191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education","volume":"39 1","pages":"21 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives of Educational Technology Teacher Educators: Mavericks, Champions, or Change Agents?\",\"authors\":\"Jon M. Clausen, A. Borthwick, David W. Rutledge, B. Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21532974.2022.2137607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Teacher education programs struggle to infuse educational technology (edtec) throughout the curriculum. Edtec faculty can play several roles within the programmatic design of teacher education programs. The purpose of this study was to explore edtec faculty perspectives of technology infusion efforts within their preparation programs. Q methodology research design and factor analysis were used to examine data from Q sorts completed exclusively by edtec faculty members (N = 16). A Q set of 44 statements was used to explore their perspectives on value of technology for teaching and learning, confidence levels, educator preparation program design, and leadership support. Results revealed participants’ strong beliefs in the value of technology for teaching and learning, and their confidence in modeling technology integration. Participants loaded on two factors demonstrating that some held a broader view of educator preparation at their institutions and were more critical of programmatic structures and leadership support for candidate development. A question remains about the role of edtec faculty as they negotiate various opportunities and expectations within teacher education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"21 - 40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2022.2137607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2022.2137607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

教师教育项目努力在整个课程中注入教育技术(edtec)。Edtec教师可以在教师教育项目的程序化设计中扮演多种角色。本研究的目的是探讨教育技术学院在其预备课程中技术注入工作的观点。本研究采用Q方法、研究设计和因子分析来检验由edtec教师(N = 16)完成的Q分类数据。一组由44个陈述组成的Q被用来探讨他们对技术对教学和学习的价值、信心水平、教育者准备计划设计和领导支持的看法。结果显示,参与者强烈相信技术对教学和学习的价值,以及他们对建模技术集成的信心。参与者强调了两个因素,表明一些人对所在机构的教育人才培养持更广泛的看法,对项目结构和领导对候选人发展的支持持更重要的态度。一个问题仍然是关于教育技术学院的角色,因为他们在教师教育中谈判各种机会和期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perspectives of Educational Technology Teacher Educators: Mavericks, Champions, or Change Agents?
Abstract Teacher education programs struggle to infuse educational technology (edtec) throughout the curriculum. Edtec faculty can play several roles within the programmatic design of teacher education programs. The purpose of this study was to explore edtec faculty perspectives of technology infusion efforts within their preparation programs. Q methodology research design and factor analysis were used to examine data from Q sorts completed exclusively by edtec faculty members (N = 16). A Q set of 44 statements was used to explore their perspectives on value of technology for teaching and learning, confidence levels, educator preparation program design, and leadership support. Results revealed participants’ strong beliefs in the value of technology for teaching and learning, and their confidence in modeling technology integration. Participants loaded on two factors demonstrating that some held a broader view of educator preparation at their institutions and were more critical of programmatic structures and leadership support for candidate development. A question remains about the role of edtec faculty as they negotiate various opportunities and expectations within teacher education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信