免疫亲和柱净化HPLC-FD法测定动物肝脏中黄曲霉毒素和赭曲霉毒素a

IF 0.4 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES
B. Stojanovska-Dimzoska, E. Dimitrieska-Stojković, Z. Hajrulai-Musliu, Risto Uzunov, A. Angeleska, D. Jankuloski, K. Blagoevska
{"title":"免疫亲和柱净化HPLC-FD法测定动物肝脏中黄曲霉毒素和赭曲霉毒素a","authors":"B. Stojanovska-Dimzoska, E. Dimitrieska-Stojković, Z. Hajrulai-Musliu, Risto Uzunov, A. Angeleska, D. Jankuloski, K. Blagoevska","doi":"10.2478/macvetrev-2021-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Analytical methods based on immunoaffinity column clean-up and quantitative determination with liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection were used to determine aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in liver samples. The validation of the procedures was performed. The linearity of the methods was checked, and a good coefficient of correlation was found for all aflatoxins and OTA as well. The LOD and LOQ were acceptable: 0.003 µg/kg and 0.009 µg/kg for AFB1; 0.001 µg/kg and 0.005 µg/kg for AFB2; 0.006 µg/kg and 0.020 µg/kg for AFG1; 0.007 µg/kg and 0.022 µg/kg for AFG2; 0.08 µg/kg and 0.27 µg/kg for OTA. The results for the repeatability estimated by the relative standard deviation (RSDr) were satisfactory and the obtained values were in the acceptable range (1.97–14.41% for all aflatoxins and 3.76-8.31% for OTA) at three proposed concentration levels. RSDR values showed acceptable correlation between two analysts for all four aflatoxins and OTA. The RSDR values were as followed: 2.37% and 5.60% for AFB1, 6.71% and 8.78% for AFB2, 4.40% and 7.00% for AFG1 and 10.30% and 13.91% for AFG2 (for the first and second analyst, respectively). The RSDR values for OTA were 4.91% and 3.15% (1 µg/kg); 3.76% and 4.12% (5 µg/kg) and 8.31% and 8.21% (10 µg/kg). The mean recovery for total aflatoxins and OTA were 78.10% and 93.34%, respectively. All validation parameters were in accordance to European legislation. They indicate that the proposed analytical procedures are suitable and they could be methods of choice for the determination of aflatoxins and OTA in liver samples.","PeriodicalId":18099,"journal":{"name":"Macedonian Veterinary Review","volume":"44 1","pages":"119 - 127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of Aflatoxins and Ochratoxin a in Animal Liver using HPLC-FD Method with Immunoaffinity Column Clean-Up\",\"authors\":\"B. Stojanovska-Dimzoska, E. Dimitrieska-Stojković, Z. Hajrulai-Musliu, Risto Uzunov, A. Angeleska, D. Jankuloski, K. Blagoevska\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/macvetrev-2021-0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Analytical methods based on immunoaffinity column clean-up and quantitative determination with liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection were used to determine aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in liver samples. The validation of the procedures was performed. The linearity of the methods was checked, and a good coefficient of correlation was found for all aflatoxins and OTA as well. The LOD and LOQ were acceptable: 0.003 µg/kg and 0.009 µg/kg for AFB1; 0.001 µg/kg and 0.005 µg/kg for AFB2; 0.006 µg/kg and 0.020 µg/kg for AFG1; 0.007 µg/kg and 0.022 µg/kg for AFG2; 0.08 µg/kg and 0.27 µg/kg for OTA. The results for the repeatability estimated by the relative standard deviation (RSDr) were satisfactory and the obtained values were in the acceptable range (1.97–14.41% for all aflatoxins and 3.76-8.31% for OTA) at three proposed concentration levels. RSDR values showed acceptable correlation between two analysts for all four aflatoxins and OTA. The RSDR values were as followed: 2.37% and 5.60% for AFB1, 6.71% and 8.78% for AFB2, 4.40% and 7.00% for AFG1 and 10.30% and 13.91% for AFG2 (for the first and second analyst, respectively). The RSDR values for OTA were 4.91% and 3.15% (1 µg/kg); 3.76% and 4.12% (5 µg/kg) and 8.31% and 8.21% (10 µg/kg). The mean recovery for total aflatoxins and OTA were 78.10% and 93.34%, respectively. All validation parameters were in accordance to European legislation. They indicate that the proposed analytical procedures are suitable and they could be methods of choice for the determination of aflatoxins and OTA in liver samples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Macedonian Veterinary Review\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"119 - 127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Macedonian Veterinary Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/macvetrev-2021-0017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macedonian Veterinary Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/macvetrev-2021-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要采用免疫亲和柱净化和液相色谱-荧光定量检测相结合的分析方法,对肝脏样品中的黄曲霉毒素和赭曲霉毒素A进行了测定。对程序进行了验证。检查了方法的线性,并发现所有黄曲霉毒素和OTA都有良好的相关性。LOD和LOQ可接受:AFB1为0.003µg/kg和0.009µg/kg;AFB2分别为0.001µg/kg和0.005µg/kg;AFG1分别为0.006µg/kg和0.020µg/kg;AFG2为0.007µg/kg和0.022µg/kg;OTA分别为0.08µg/kg和0.27µg/kg。相对标准偏差(RSDr)估计的重复性结果令人满意,在三个拟议浓度水平下,获得的值在可接受范围内(所有黄曲霉毒素为1.97–14.41%,OTA为3.76–8.31%)。RSDR值显示,所有四种黄曲霉毒素和OTA的两个分析员之间存在可接受的相关性。RSDR值如下:AFB1为2.37%和5.60%,AFB2为6.71%和8.78%,AFG1为4.40%和7.00%,AFG2为10.30%和13.91%(分别用于第一和第二分析员)。OTA的RSDR值分别为4.91%和3.15%(1µg/kg);3.76%和4.12%(5µg/kg)以及8.31%和8.21%(10µg/kg)。黄曲霉毒素和OTA的平均回收率分别为78.10%和93.34%。所有验证参数均符合欧洲法规。它们表明,所提出的分析方法是合适的,可以作为测定肝脏样品中黄曲霉毒素和OTA的选择方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination of Aflatoxins and Ochratoxin a in Animal Liver using HPLC-FD Method with Immunoaffinity Column Clean-Up
Abstract Analytical methods based on immunoaffinity column clean-up and quantitative determination with liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection were used to determine aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in liver samples. The validation of the procedures was performed. The linearity of the methods was checked, and a good coefficient of correlation was found for all aflatoxins and OTA as well. The LOD and LOQ were acceptable: 0.003 µg/kg and 0.009 µg/kg for AFB1; 0.001 µg/kg and 0.005 µg/kg for AFB2; 0.006 µg/kg and 0.020 µg/kg for AFG1; 0.007 µg/kg and 0.022 µg/kg for AFG2; 0.08 µg/kg and 0.27 µg/kg for OTA. The results for the repeatability estimated by the relative standard deviation (RSDr) were satisfactory and the obtained values were in the acceptable range (1.97–14.41% for all aflatoxins and 3.76-8.31% for OTA) at three proposed concentration levels. RSDR values showed acceptable correlation between two analysts for all four aflatoxins and OTA. The RSDR values were as followed: 2.37% and 5.60% for AFB1, 6.71% and 8.78% for AFB2, 4.40% and 7.00% for AFG1 and 10.30% and 13.91% for AFG2 (for the first and second analyst, respectively). The RSDR values for OTA were 4.91% and 3.15% (1 µg/kg); 3.76% and 4.12% (5 µg/kg) and 8.31% and 8.21% (10 µg/kg). The mean recovery for total aflatoxins and OTA were 78.10% and 93.34%, respectively. All validation parameters were in accordance to European legislation. They indicate that the proposed analytical procedures are suitable and they could be methods of choice for the determination of aflatoxins and OTA in liver samples.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Macedonian Veterinary Review
Macedonian Veterinary Review Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信