工党问题:对美国例外主义、美国共产党的作用和1936年至1955年美国共产党领导/影响的工会活动的反思

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Victor G. Devinatz
{"title":"工党问题:对美国例外主义、美国共产党的作用和1936年至1955年美国共产党领导/影响的工会活动的反思","authors":"Victor G. Devinatz","doi":"10.1080/14743892.2021.1877071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One issue that has haunted the US trade union movement from its early years to the present day is “Why is there no labor party in the United States?” The earliest posing of this question is probably Werner Sombert’s 1906 book, Why is There no Socialism in the United States? which attributes this lack of a US labor party to American exceptionalism. More recent volumes published in the twenty-first century attribute a US labor party’s absence to other factors. In basic terms, the question posed in these books refers to why there is no mass workers’ party in the United States which might take the form of Labor, Social Democratic, Socialist or Communist parties which express the interests of the working class in the political arena as opposed to trade unions which represent the working class’ interests in the economic arena. It was important for trade unions to participate in political activities in the promotion of the passage of pro-worker laws such as the 1871 Trade Union Act in Britain, which provided unions with legal protection, and the 1874 Factory Act which capped the workday at 10 h. Trade unions also supported, worked for and made financial contributions to candidates and political parties that they perceived would benefit labor and the collective interests of workers. To achieve this objective, labor unions directly affiliated themselves with workers’ parties, those perceived as being pro-working class and socialist in orientation (such as Labor, Social Democratic, Socialist and Communist parties, as previously mentioned). Typical exemplars of such workers’ political parties included the British Labor Party, established in","PeriodicalId":35150,"journal":{"name":"American Communist History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14743892.2021.1877071","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Labor Party Question: Rethinking American Exceptionalism, the CPUSA’s Role and CPUSA-Led/Influenced Trade Union Activity Circa 1936 to 1955\",\"authors\":\"Victor G. Devinatz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14743892.2021.1877071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One issue that has haunted the US trade union movement from its early years to the present day is “Why is there no labor party in the United States?” The earliest posing of this question is probably Werner Sombert’s 1906 book, Why is There no Socialism in the United States? which attributes this lack of a US labor party to American exceptionalism. More recent volumes published in the twenty-first century attribute a US labor party’s absence to other factors. In basic terms, the question posed in these books refers to why there is no mass workers’ party in the United States which might take the form of Labor, Social Democratic, Socialist or Communist parties which express the interests of the working class in the political arena as opposed to trade unions which represent the working class’ interests in the economic arena. It was important for trade unions to participate in political activities in the promotion of the passage of pro-worker laws such as the 1871 Trade Union Act in Britain, which provided unions with legal protection, and the 1874 Factory Act which capped the workday at 10 h. Trade unions also supported, worked for and made financial contributions to candidates and political parties that they perceived would benefit labor and the collective interests of workers. To achieve this objective, labor unions directly affiliated themselves with workers’ parties, those perceived as being pro-working class and socialist in orientation (such as Labor, Social Democratic, Socialist and Communist parties, as previously mentioned). Typical exemplars of such workers’ political parties included the British Labor Party, established in\",\"PeriodicalId\":35150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Communist History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14743892.2021.1877071\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Communist History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14743892.2021.1877071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Communist History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14743892.2021.1877071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从早期到今天,一直困扰着美国工会运动的一个问题是“为什么美国没有工党?”这个问题最早提出的可能是沃纳·索伯特1906年的书《为什么美国没有社会主义?这将美国工党的缺乏归因于美国的例外主义。21世纪出版的最新几卷书将美国工党的缺席归因于其他因素。从根本上讲,这些书中提出的问题是指,为什么美国没有一个群众性的工人党,其形式可能是在政治舞台上表达工人阶级利益的工党、社会民主党、社会党或共产党,而不是在经济舞台上代表工人阶级利益。工会必须参与政治活动,促进通过有利于工人的法律,如为工会提供法律保护的1871年《工会法》和将工作日限制在10小时的1874年《工厂法》,为候选人和政党工作,并为他们认为有利于劳工和工人集体利益的政党做出经济贡献。为了实现这一目标,工会直接隶属于工人党,即那些被视为亲工人阶级和社会主义的政党(如前面提到的工党、社会民主党、社会党和共产党)。这类工人政党的典型代表包括成立于
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Labor Party Question: Rethinking American Exceptionalism, the CPUSA’s Role and CPUSA-Led/Influenced Trade Union Activity Circa 1936 to 1955
One issue that has haunted the US trade union movement from its early years to the present day is “Why is there no labor party in the United States?” The earliest posing of this question is probably Werner Sombert’s 1906 book, Why is There no Socialism in the United States? which attributes this lack of a US labor party to American exceptionalism. More recent volumes published in the twenty-first century attribute a US labor party’s absence to other factors. In basic terms, the question posed in these books refers to why there is no mass workers’ party in the United States which might take the form of Labor, Social Democratic, Socialist or Communist parties which express the interests of the working class in the political arena as opposed to trade unions which represent the working class’ interests in the economic arena. It was important for trade unions to participate in political activities in the promotion of the passage of pro-worker laws such as the 1871 Trade Union Act in Britain, which provided unions with legal protection, and the 1874 Factory Act which capped the workday at 10 h. Trade unions also supported, worked for and made financial contributions to candidates and political parties that they perceived would benefit labor and the collective interests of workers. To achieve this objective, labor unions directly affiliated themselves with workers’ parties, those perceived as being pro-working class and socialist in orientation (such as Labor, Social Democratic, Socialist and Communist parties, as previously mentioned). Typical exemplars of such workers’ political parties included the British Labor Party, established in
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Communist History
American Communist History Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信