永久性支持性住房中社区空间的建筑设计特征、用途和感知

IF 1.2 2区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Yelena McLane Ph.D., Jill Pable Ph.D.
{"title":"永久性支持性住房中社区空间的建筑设计特征、用途和感知","authors":"Yelena McLane Ph.D.,&nbsp;Jill Pable Ph.D.","doi":"10.1111/joid.12165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>People experiencing homelessness often face recoveries complicated by mental disability, substance abuse, and trauma. They can withdraw into self-imposed isolation and avoid important support services, making recovery more difficult. Affirmative relationships developed in part within the designed settings of transitional housing may play a significant role in countering these tendencies. The presence and effectiveness of communal gathering spaces in supportive housing must be better understood as a design problem, particularly given users' diverse ages, ethnicities, and health needs, which effectively inclusive environments must accommodate. In recent decades, architecture as a discipline has pivoted toward more human-centered approaches, with the individual's dignity and well-being at center stage. This study applies social science-based research methods and spatial analytics to the end of understanding how specific interior spaces, key to the recovery process, might be improved. The authors posit that the success of resident gathering spaces intended to prompt and support resident relationships and decrease users' feelings of marginalization may be influenced by a range of sociospatial design factors (i.e. visibility and ease of access, adjacencies, access to daylight and views, furniture types, and aesthetics) together with facility policies and events programming. The authors use a combination of space syntax, surveys, and qualitative methods to analyze two contrasting layouts in supportive housing locations in the UK and Florida, drawing conclusions intended to steer the development of typologies for similar facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":56199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interior Design","volume":"45 1","pages":"33-52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/joid.12165","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Architectural Design Characteristics, Uses, and Perceptions of Community Spaces in Permanent Supportive Housing\",\"authors\":\"Yelena McLane Ph.D.,&nbsp;Jill Pable Ph.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joid.12165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>People experiencing homelessness often face recoveries complicated by mental disability, substance abuse, and trauma. They can withdraw into self-imposed isolation and avoid important support services, making recovery more difficult. Affirmative relationships developed in part within the designed settings of transitional housing may play a significant role in countering these tendencies. The presence and effectiveness of communal gathering spaces in supportive housing must be better understood as a design problem, particularly given users' diverse ages, ethnicities, and health needs, which effectively inclusive environments must accommodate. In recent decades, architecture as a discipline has pivoted toward more human-centered approaches, with the individual's dignity and well-being at center stage. This study applies social science-based research methods and spatial analytics to the end of understanding how specific interior spaces, key to the recovery process, might be improved. The authors posit that the success of resident gathering spaces intended to prompt and support resident relationships and decrease users' feelings of marginalization may be influenced by a range of sociospatial design factors (i.e. visibility and ease of access, adjacencies, access to daylight and views, furniture types, and aesthetics) together with facility policies and events programming. The authors use a combination of space syntax, surveys, and qualitative methods to analyze two contrasting layouts in supportive housing locations in the UK and Florida, drawing conclusions intended to steer the development of typologies for similar facilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interior Design\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"33-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/joid.12165\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interior Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joid.12165\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interior Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joid.12165","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

无家可归的人往往会因精神残疾、药物滥用和创伤而面临复杂的康复。他们可以退回到自我孤立的状态,避免重要的支持服务,使康复更加困难。部分在设计的过渡性住房环境中建立的积极关系可能在抵制这些趋势方面发挥重要作用。支持性住房中公共聚会空间的存在和有效性必须更好地理解为一个设计问题,特别是考虑到用户的不同年龄、种族和健康需求,有效的包容性环境必须适应这些需求。近几十年来,建筑作为一门学科已经转向以人为中心的方法,以个人的尊严和福祉为中心。本研究运用基于社会科学的研究方法和空间分析来了解如何改善特定的内部空间,这是恢复过程的关键。作者认为居民的成功收集空间旨在提示和支持居民关系和减少用户的边缘化的感觉可能会受到一系列社会空间设计因素的影响(即可见性和易于访问,邻接,日光和视图,家具类型,和美学)一起设施政策和事件编程。作者结合空间句法、调查和定性方法,分析了英国和佛罗里达州支持性住房地点的两种对比布局,得出旨在指导类似设施类型学发展的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Architectural Design Characteristics, Uses, and Perceptions of Community Spaces in Permanent Supportive Housing

People experiencing homelessness often face recoveries complicated by mental disability, substance abuse, and trauma. They can withdraw into self-imposed isolation and avoid important support services, making recovery more difficult. Affirmative relationships developed in part within the designed settings of transitional housing may play a significant role in countering these tendencies. The presence and effectiveness of communal gathering spaces in supportive housing must be better understood as a design problem, particularly given users' diverse ages, ethnicities, and health needs, which effectively inclusive environments must accommodate. In recent decades, architecture as a discipline has pivoted toward more human-centered approaches, with the individual's dignity and well-being at center stage. This study applies social science-based research methods and spatial analytics to the end of understanding how specific interior spaces, key to the recovery process, might be improved. The authors posit that the success of resident gathering spaces intended to prompt and support resident relationships and decrease users' feelings of marginalization may be influenced by a range of sociospatial design factors (i.e. visibility and ease of access, adjacencies, access to daylight and views, furniture types, and aesthetics) together with facility policies and events programming. The authors use a combination of space syntax, surveys, and qualitative methods to analyze two contrasting layouts in supportive housing locations in the UK and Florida, drawing conclusions intended to steer the development of typologies for similar facilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
30.80%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interior Design is a scholarly, refereed publication dedicated to issues related to the design of the interior environment. Scholarly inquiry representing the entire spectrum of interior design theory, research, education and practice is invited. Submissions are encouraged from educators, designers, anthropologists, architects, historians, psychologists, sociologists, or others interested in interior design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信