筛查老年人结肠镜检查不良事件:虚弱重要吗?

N. Toosizadeh, Hossein Ehsani, S. Taleban, Todd Golden, Coco Tirambulo, J. Mohler
{"title":"筛查老年人结肠镜检查不良事件:虚弱重要吗?","authors":"N. Toosizadeh, Hossein Ehsani, S. Taleban, Todd Golden, Coco Tirambulo, J. Mohler","doi":"10.23937/2469-5858/1510055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Screening colonoscopy is beneficial in screening for colorectal cancer, though it is not without risks, which increase with increasing age. The objectives of this prospective feasibility and outcomes study was to assess the effectiveness of the upper-extremity frailty (UEF) test to risk stratify adults ≥ 50 years of age undergoing routine screening colonoscopy. Socio-demographic data, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and UEF clinical frailty syndrome classification (nonfrail versus pre-frail/frail) were assessed prior to colonoscopy, and acute colonoscopy outcomes were stratified into three severity categories. Logistic regression and ANOVA/ ANCOVA were employed. 41% of non-frail had one or more complications, versus 70% of pre-frail/frail group. Those in the pre-frail/frail group had nearly three times the number of acute colonoscopy complications (OR 2.84, p = 0.01) when compared to the nonfrail. Chronological age, and comorbidity score (CCI) failed to predict complication outcomes. UEF frailty was useful in predicting acute complications in screening colonoscopy.","PeriodicalId":91314,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric medicine and gerontology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening Colonoscopy Adverse Events in Aging Adults: Does Frailty Matter?\",\"authors\":\"N. Toosizadeh, Hossein Ehsani, S. Taleban, Todd Golden, Coco Tirambulo, J. Mohler\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2469-5858/1510055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Screening colonoscopy is beneficial in screening for colorectal cancer, though it is not without risks, which increase with increasing age. The objectives of this prospective feasibility and outcomes study was to assess the effectiveness of the upper-extremity frailty (UEF) test to risk stratify adults ≥ 50 years of age undergoing routine screening colonoscopy. Socio-demographic data, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and UEF clinical frailty syndrome classification (nonfrail versus pre-frail/frail) were assessed prior to colonoscopy, and acute colonoscopy outcomes were stratified into three severity categories. Logistic regression and ANOVA/ ANCOVA were employed. 41% of non-frail had one or more complications, versus 70% of pre-frail/frail group. Those in the pre-frail/frail group had nearly three times the number of acute colonoscopy complications (OR 2.84, p = 0.01) when compared to the nonfrail. Chronological age, and comorbidity score (CCI) failed to predict complication outcomes. UEF frailty was useful in predicting acute complications in screening colonoscopy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of geriatric medicine and gerontology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of geriatric medicine and gerontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-5858/1510055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric medicine and gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-5858/1510055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

筛查结肠镜检查有利于筛查癌症,尽管它并非没有风险,风险随着年龄的增长而增加。这项前瞻性可行性和结果研究的目的是评估上肢虚弱(UEF)测试对接受常规筛查结肠镜检查的≥50岁成年人进行风险分层的有效性。结肠镜检查前评估社会人口学数据、Charlson合并症指数(CCI)和UEF临床虚弱综合征分类(非疲劳与前期虚弱/虚弱),并将急性结肠镜检查结果分为三个严重程度类别。采用Logistic回归和ANOVA/ANCOVA。41%的非体弱者有一种或多种并发症,而体弱前期/体弱组为70%。与非炎症组相比,虚弱前期/虚弱组的急性结肠镜检查并发症数量几乎是非炎症组的三倍(OR 2.84,p=0.01)。按时间顺序排列的年龄和合并症评分(CCI)无法预测并发症的结果。UEF虚弱有助于预测结肠镜筛查中的急性并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Screening Colonoscopy Adverse Events in Aging Adults: Does Frailty Matter?
Screening colonoscopy is beneficial in screening for colorectal cancer, though it is not without risks, which increase with increasing age. The objectives of this prospective feasibility and outcomes study was to assess the effectiveness of the upper-extremity frailty (UEF) test to risk stratify adults ≥ 50 years of age undergoing routine screening colonoscopy. Socio-demographic data, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and UEF clinical frailty syndrome classification (nonfrail versus pre-frail/frail) were assessed prior to colonoscopy, and acute colonoscopy outcomes were stratified into three severity categories. Logistic regression and ANOVA/ ANCOVA were employed. 41% of non-frail had one or more complications, versus 70% of pre-frail/frail group. Those in the pre-frail/frail group had nearly three times the number of acute colonoscopy complications (OR 2.84, p = 0.01) when compared to the nonfrail. Chronological age, and comorbidity score (CCI) failed to predict complication outcomes. UEF frailty was useful in predicting acute complications in screening colonoscopy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信