食品供应链侧流管理通过生命周期评估和生命周期成本:一个实践者的观点

International Journal on Food System Dynamics Pub Date : 2017-06-23 DOI:10.18461/PFSD.2017.1731

K. Östergren, Jennifer Davis, F. D. Menna, M. Vittuari, N. Unger, M. Loubiere

{"title":"食品供应链侧流管理通过生命周期评估和生命周期成本:一个实践者的观点","authors":"K. Östergren, Jennifer Davis, F. D. Menna, M. Vittuari, N. Unger, M. Loubiere","doi":"10.18461/PFSD.2017.1731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urged by the importance of resource efficiency and circular economy agenda policy makers, many stakeholders are seeking alternatives for current surplus food or side flows within the food supply chain. Any new valorisation or intervention aimed to prevent food waste will however be associated with impacts (monetary and environmental). To allow informed decision making at all levels, from individual stakeholder to policy level, robust, consistent and science based approaches are required. The EU H2020 funded project REFRESH (Resource Efficient Food and dRink for the Entire Supply cHain) aims to contribute to food waste reduction throughout the food supply chain, and evaluate the environmental impacts and life cycle costs. This paper presents a guidance document being developed within REFRESH on how to apply Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and environmental Life Cycle Costing (E-LCC) and how to combine them in the context of food waste. Recommendations are given on the scoping on footprint studies as well as on change-oriented studies on interventions for side flows from the food supply chain. The overall aim of the current research is contribute to a better scoping practice of LCAs and LCCs of side flows in a food waste context.","PeriodicalId":37887,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on Food System Dynamics","volume":"2017 1","pages":"300-303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food supply chain side flows management through Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing: a practitioner’s perspective\",\"authors\":\"K. Östergren, Jennifer Davis, F. D. Menna, M. Vittuari, N. Unger, M. Loubiere\",\"doi\":\"10.18461/PFSD.2017.1731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Urged by the importance of resource efficiency and circular economy agenda policy makers, many stakeholders are seeking alternatives for current surplus food or side flows within the food supply chain. Any new valorisation or intervention aimed to prevent food waste will however be associated with impacts (monetary and environmental). To allow informed decision making at all levels, from individual stakeholder to policy level, robust, consistent and science based approaches are required. The EU H2020 funded project REFRESH (Resource Efficient Food and dRink for the Entire Supply cHain) aims to contribute to food waste reduction throughout the food supply chain, and evaluate the environmental impacts and life cycle costs. This paper presents a guidance document being developed within REFRESH on how to apply Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and environmental Life Cycle Costing (E-LCC) and how to combine them in the context of food waste. Recommendations are given on the scoping on footprint studies as well as on change-oriented studies on interventions for side flows from the food supply chain. The overall aim of the current research is contribute to a better scoping practice of LCAs and LCCs of side flows in a food waste context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal on Food System Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"2017 1\",\"pages\":\"300-303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal on Food System Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18461/PFSD.2017.1731\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on Food System Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18461/PFSD.2017.1731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

在资源效率和循环经济议程决策者的重要性的推动下，许多利益攸关方正在寻找替代目前粮食过剩或粮食供应链内副流的方案。然而，任何旨在防止食物浪费的新定价或干预措施都会产生影响（货币和环境）。为了在从个人利益相关者到政策层面的所有层面上做出明智的决策，需要稳健、一致和基于科学的方法。欧盟H2020资助的REFRESH（资源高效食品和整个供应链的链接）项目旨在为减少整个食品供应链的食品浪费做出贡献，并评估环境影响和生命周期成本。本文介绍了REFRESH正在制定的一份指导文件，内容涉及如何应用生命周期评估（LCA）和环境生命周期成本计算（E-LCC），以及如何在食物浪费的背景下将它们结合起来。对足迹研究的范围界定以及对食品供应链副流干预措施的变革导向研究提出了建议。当前研究的总体目标是有助于更好地界定食物浪费背景下副流的LCA和LCC的范围。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Food supply chain side flows management through Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing: a practitioner’s perspective

Urged by the importance of resource efficiency and circular economy agenda policy makers, many stakeholders are seeking alternatives for current surplus food or side flows within the food supply chain. Any new valorisation or intervention aimed to prevent food waste will however be associated with impacts (monetary and environmental). To allow informed decision making at all levels, from individual stakeholder to policy level, robust, consistent and science based approaches are required. The EU H2020 funded project REFRESH (Resource Efficient Food and dRink for the Entire Supply cHain) aims to contribute to food waste reduction throughout the food supply chain, and evaluate the environmental impacts and life cycle costs. This paper presents a guidance document being developed within REFRESH on how to apply Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and environmental Life Cycle Costing (E-LCC) and how to combine them in the context of food waste. Recommendations are given on the scoping on footprint studies as well as on change-oriented studies on interventions for side flows from the food supply chain. The overall aim of the current research is contribute to a better scoping practice of LCAs and LCCs of side flows in a food waste context.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Journal on Food System Dynamics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Understanding the development of the food system requires a system view that captures the complexity of the system and its many interrelationships with its economic, social and natural environments. The Journal accepts and offers papers within this broad range of issues focussing on the management, policy, marketing, consumer aspects, transparency, e-commerce, institutional or regional development, information and communication systems, ressource economics, production economics, chain management, network economics, and similar aspects. Papers may focus on modeling, empirical research or theoretical analyis. This broad range of publication opportunities asks authors to follow clear lines of arguments and to present arguments in a convincing way that avoids unnecessary complexities of model formulations if not relevant for the support of arguments. The publication of scientific articles is complemented by a number of sections that provide room for publications with a more specific focus: ''Case studies'': A section on case studies of the ''Harvard Type'' allows the publication of studies that might build on established scientific methodology but demonstrate its use in ceratin decision environments. Case studies might be complemented by ''teaching cases'' that are kept on a database outside the journal but accessible to readers on approval by authors. ''Research Forum'': It allows to discuss newly emerging research challenges or to contribute to ongoing scientific discussions on research problems. In addition, authors might initiate a discussion on issues brought up by articles published in the journal. ''Research Notes'': It provides room for specific shorter scientific contributions with a narrow scope.