有吸引力的手稿的同行评审时间更短吗?

IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Guangyao Zhang, Furong Shang, Lili Wang, Weixi Xie, Pengfei Jia, Chunlin Jiang, Xianwen Wang
{"title":"有吸引力的手稿的同行评审时间更短吗?","authors":"Guangyao Zhang, Furong Shang, Lili Wang, Weixi Xie, Pengfei Jia, Chunlin Jiang, Xianwen Wang","doi":"10.1177/01655515231174382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Authors often ask how long the peer review process takes. Peer review duration has attracted much attention in academia in recent years. Existing research focuses primarily on the statistical characteristics of peer review duration, with few studies considering the potential influence of manuscripts’ attractiveness. This study aims to fill this research gap by employing attention economy theory. By analysing the peer review history of articles published in The British Medical Journal and 16 information and library science journals, we find a significant negative relationship between peer review duration and the Altmetric Attention Score. Overall, our study offers a new perspective on peer review behaviour and bridges the divide between peer reviews and altmetrics.","PeriodicalId":54796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is peer review duration shorter for attractive manuscripts?\",\"authors\":\"Guangyao Zhang, Furong Shang, Lili Wang, Weixi Xie, Pengfei Jia, Chunlin Jiang, Xianwen Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01655515231174382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Authors often ask how long the peer review process takes. Peer review duration has attracted much attention in academia in recent years. Existing research focuses primarily on the statistical characteristics of peer review duration, with few studies considering the potential influence of manuscripts’ attractiveness. This study aims to fill this research gap by employing attention economy theory. By analysing the peer review history of articles published in The British Medical Journal and 16 information and library science journals, we find a significant negative relationship between peer review duration and the Altmetric Attention Score. Overall, our study offers a new perspective on peer review behaviour and bridges the divide between peer reviews and altmetrics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Information Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Information Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515231174382\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515231174382","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者经常问同行评审过程需要多长时间。近年来,同行评审的持续时间引起了学术界的广泛关注。现有的研究主要集中在同行评审持续时间的统计特征上,很少有研究考虑手稿吸引力的潜在影响。本研究旨在运用注意力经济理论填补这一研究空白。通过分析《英国医学杂志》和16种信息与图书馆学期刊上发表的文章的同行评审历史,我们发现同行评审持续时间与Altmetric注意力得分之间存在显著的负相关关系。总的来说,我们的研究为同行评审行为提供了一个新的视角,并弥合了同行评审和altmetrics之间的分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is peer review duration shorter for attractive manuscripts?
Authors often ask how long the peer review process takes. Peer review duration has attracted much attention in academia in recent years. Existing research focuses primarily on the statistical characteristics of peer review duration, with few studies considering the potential influence of manuscripts’ attractiveness. This study aims to fill this research gap by employing attention economy theory. By analysing the peer review history of articles published in The British Medical Journal and 16 information and library science journals, we find a significant negative relationship between peer review duration and the Altmetric Attention Score. Overall, our study offers a new perspective on peer review behaviour and bridges the divide between peer reviews and altmetrics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Information Science
Journal of Information Science 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
121
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Information Science is a peer-reviewed international journal of high repute covering topics of interest to all those researching and working in the sciences of information and knowledge management. The Editors welcome material on any aspect of information science theory, policy, application or practice that will advance thinking in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信