法国癌症儿童和青年期幸存者乳腺和甲状腺筛查的医疗保健系统障碍:DeNaCaPST计划一年的定性研究

C. demoor-goldschmidt, C. Berger, I. Guichard, S. Supiot, A. Dezellus, B. Filhon, piere-yves bondiau, M. Poirée, C. Oudot, L. Claude, G. Truc, C. Briandet, L. Padovani, C. Coze, V. Bernier, C. Kerr, Y. Réguerre, H. Sudour-Bonnange, J. Gaudichon, C. Vigneron, A. Dumas, F. Vathaire
{"title":"法国癌症儿童和青年期幸存者乳腺和甲状腺筛查的医疗保健系统障碍:DeNaCaPST计划一年的定性研究","authors":"C. demoor-goldschmidt, C. Berger, I. Guichard, S. Supiot, A. Dezellus, B. Filhon, piere-yves bondiau, M. Poirée, C. Oudot, L. Claude, G. Truc, C. Briandet, L. Padovani, C. Coze, V. Bernier, C. Kerr, Y. Réguerre, H. Sudour-Bonnange, J. Gaudichon, C. Vigneron, A. Dumas, F. Vathaire","doi":"10.21203/rs.2.11121/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Purpose\nChildhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors (CAYACS) who were treated by radiotherapy have a significant risk of developing subsequent malignancies, particularly breast and thyroid cancers when the field of irradiation concerned these organs. Advice regarding their increased risk of developing secondary breast (SBC) and thyroid (STC) cancer are recommended to ensure risk-stratified life-long follow-up care including appropriate screening. In France, a national program called DeNaCaPST was started to promote this care. We aimed to explore the perspectives of medical practitioners (MP) on the healthcare system factors that limited inclusion in this programme.\nMethods\nData of the DeNaCAPST programme regarding organisation were studied, including data from a qualitative survey done among MP.\nResults\nSeventeen months after the DeNaCaPST programme started, 84.6% of the French regions had participating centres/hospitals, along with one overseas territory. The main barriers to screening highlighted by MP were: 1) inconvenient and under-resourced healthcare professionals to perform these consultations, (2) difficulty determining which CAYACS need SBC and/or STC screening, (3) difficulty organising the network of professionals from paediatric to adult health services.\nConclusions\nDespite a slow inclusion speed and a suboptimal geographical coverage, changes are underway and should allow for several improvements and interesting perspectives for this study. CAYACS lost to follow-up are difficult to invite for a consultation. The absence of real long-term follow-up care is a real barrier to promoting such screening, which must involve a transition care between the paediatric oncologists who know who are at risk and why and the adult medical professionals who have the knowledge to do the screening. The involvement and empowerment of CAYACS is necessary to promote patient-centred healthcare solutions and seems feasible.","PeriodicalId":90808,"journal":{"name":"Clinical research and trials","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare system barriers of breast and thyroid screening for childhood and young adulthood cancer survivors in France: A qualitative study of the DeNaCaPST programme at one year\",\"authors\":\"C. demoor-goldschmidt, C. Berger, I. Guichard, S. Supiot, A. Dezellus, B. Filhon, piere-yves bondiau, M. Poirée, C. Oudot, L. Claude, G. Truc, C. Briandet, L. Padovani, C. Coze, V. Bernier, C. Kerr, Y. Réguerre, H. Sudour-Bonnange, J. Gaudichon, C. Vigneron, A. Dumas, F. Vathaire\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.2.11121/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Purpose\\nChildhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors (CAYACS) who were treated by radiotherapy have a significant risk of developing subsequent malignancies, particularly breast and thyroid cancers when the field of irradiation concerned these organs. Advice regarding their increased risk of developing secondary breast (SBC) and thyroid (STC) cancer are recommended to ensure risk-stratified life-long follow-up care including appropriate screening. In France, a national program called DeNaCaPST was started to promote this care. We aimed to explore the perspectives of medical practitioners (MP) on the healthcare system factors that limited inclusion in this programme.\\nMethods\\nData of the DeNaCAPST programme regarding organisation were studied, including data from a qualitative survey done among MP.\\nResults\\nSeventeen months after the DeNaCaPST programme started, 84.6% of the French regions had participating centres/hospitals, along with one overseas territory. The main barriers to screening highlighted by MP were: 1) inconvenient and under-resourced healthcare professionals to perform these consultations, (2) difficulty determining which CAYACS need SBC and/or STC screening, (3) difficulty organising the network of professionals from paediatric to adult health services.\\nConclusions\\nDespite a slow inclusion speed and a suboptimal geographical coverage, changes are underway and should allow for several improvements and interesting perspectives for this study. CAYACS lost to follow-up are difficult to invite for a consultation. The absence of real long-term follow-up care is a real barrier to promoting such screening, which must involve a transition care between the paediatric oncologists who know who are at risk and why and the adult medical professionals who have the knowledge to do the screening. The involvement and empowerment of CAYACS is necessary to promote patient-centred healthcare solutions and seems feasible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical research and trials\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical research and trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.11121/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical research and trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.11121/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:接受放射治疗的儿童、青少年和青年癌症幸存者(CAYACS)发生后续恶性肿瘤的风险很大,特别是当放射领域涉及这些器官时,乳腺癌和甲状腺癌。建议就其发生继发性乳腺癌(SBC)和甲状腺癌(STC)的风险增加提出建议,以确保风险分层的终身随访护理,包括适当的筛查。在法国,一个名为DeNaCaPST的国家项目开始推广这种护理。我们的目的是探讨医生的观点(MP)对医疗保健系统的因素,限制纳入本计划。方法对DeNaCAPST项目的组织数据进行研究,包括对MP进行的定性调查数据。结果在DeNaCaPST方案启动17个月后,84.6%的法国大区拥有参与的中心/医院,以及一个海外领土。MP强调筛查的主要障碍是:1)执行这些咨询的医疗保健专业人员不方便且资源不足,(2)难以确定哪些CAYACS需要SBC和/或STC筛查,(3)难以组织从儿科到成人健康服务的专业人员网络。尽管纳入速度较慢,地理覆盖不理想,但变化正在进行中,并且应该允许本研究的一些改进和有趣的观点。失去随访的CAYACS很难被邀请进行咨询。缺乏真正的长期后续护理是促进这种筛查的真正障碍,这必须涉及了解谁有风险及其原因的儿科肿瘤学家与具有进行筛查知识的成人医疗专业人员之间的过渡护理。CAYACS的参与和授权对于促进以患者为中心的医疗保健解决方案是必要的,并且似乎是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Healthcare system barriers of breast and thyroid screening for childhood and young adulthood cancer survivors in France: A qualitative study of the DeNaCaPST programme at one year
Purpose Childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors (CAYACS) who were treated by radiotherapy have a significant risk of developing subsequent malignancies, particularly breast and thyroid cancers when the field of irradiation concerned these organs. Advice regarding their increased risk of developing secondary breast (SBC) and thyroid (STC) cancer are recommended to ensure risk-stratified life-long follow-up care including appropriate screening. In France, a national program called DeNaCaPST was started to promote this care. We aimed to explore the perspectives of medical practitioners (MP) on the healthcare system factors that limited inclusion in this programme. Methods Data of the DeNaCAPST programme regarding organisation were studied, including data from a qualitative survey done among MP. Results Seventeen months after the DeNaCaPST programme started, 84.6% of the French regions had participating centres/hospitals, along with one overseas territory. The main barriers to screening highlighted by MP were: 1) inconvenient and under-resourced healthcare professionals to perform these consultations, (2) difficulty determining which CAYACS need SBC and/or STC screening, (3) difficulty organising the network of professionals from paediatric to adult health services. Conclusions Despite a slow inclusion speed and a suboptimal geographical coverage, changes are underway and should allow for several improvements and interesting perspectives for this study. CAYACS lost to follow-up are difficult to invite for a consultation. The absence of real long-term follow-up care is a real barrier to promoting such screening, which must involve a transition care between the paediatric oncologists who know who are at risk and why and the adult medical professionals who have the knowledge to do the screening. The involvement and empowerment of CAYACS is necessary to promote patient-centred healthcare solutions and seems feasible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信