制定指标以衡量南非西开普省减少酒精危害战略的执行情况

Q4 Medicine
C. Parry, P. Trangenstein, J. Erasmus, A. Diedericks, Nadine Harker
{"title":"制定指标以衡量南非西开普省减少酒精危害战略的执行情况","authors":"C. Parry, P. Trangenstein, J. Erasmus, A. Diedericks, Nadine Harker","doi":"10.4314/ajdas.v20i2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This manuscript describes a process to develop a set of indicators to monitor and evaluate the implementation of the Western Cape Alcohol-Related Harms Reduction (AHR) White Paper in South Africa and provide a final set of indicators. Drawing on the framework in Andréasson et al. (2009), a logic model with categories and types of indicators (i.e. prevention, determinants, consumption, and alcohol-related harms) was used to develop an initial set of 255 indicators. The methodological process followed involved a) scoping of a large electronic database maintained by the South African Medical Research Council, b) a comprehensive literature review and, c) reaching out to18 international key informants. Iterative communications with stakeholders from diverse government entities via email, telephone calls and individual and multi-person face-to-face meetings, together with a consensus process involving the study team was used to refine the indicators. The final set included 176 indicators; 108, (61.4%) of these were “core” indicators, and 68 (38.6%) were “expanded” indicators, meaning they added to the core indicators in given areas which would be useful to have but are of a lower priority or are likely to be less easy to obtain. Of the core indicators, 45 (42.4%) were deemed by policy makers/researchers in the Premier’s office as “high-level indicators,” denoting that they were the most essential. This manuscript demonstrates that it is possible to develop evidence-based, location-specific indicators to evaluate policy implementation.","PeriodicalId":39196,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Drug and Alcohol Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing Indicators to Measure the Implementation of the Western Cape Alcohol Harms Reduction Strategy in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"C. Parry, P. Trangenstein, J. Erasmus, A. Diedericks, Nadine Harker\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/ajdas.v20i2.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This manuscript describes a process to develop a set of indicators to monitor and evaluate the implementation of the Western Cape Alcohol-Related Harms Reduction (AHR) White Paper in South Africa and provide a final set of indicators. Drawing on the framework in Andréasson et al. (2009), a logic model with categories and types of indicators (i.e. prevention, determinants, consumption, and alcohol-related harms) was used to develop an initial set of 255 indicators. The methodological process followed involved a) scoping of a large electronic database maintained by the South African Medical Research Council, b) a comprehensive literature review and, c) reaching out to18 international key informants. Iterative communications with stakeholders from diverse government entities via email, telephone calls and individual and multi-person face-to-face meetings, together with a consensus process involving the study team was used to refine the indicators. The final set included 176 indicators; 108, (61.4%) of these were “core” indicators, and 68 (38.6%) were “expanded” indicators, meaning they added to the core indicators in given areas which would be useful to have but are of a lower priority or are likely to be less easy to obtain. Of the core indicators, 45 (42.4%) were deemed by policy makers/researchers in the Premier’s office as “high-level indicators,” denoting that they were the most essential. This manuscript demonstrates that it is possible to develop evidence-based, location-specific indicators to evaluate policy implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Drug and Alcohol Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Drug and Alcohol Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/ajdas.v20i2.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Drug and Alcohol Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ajdas.v20i2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这份手稿描述了制定一套指标的过程,以监测和评估《西开普省减少酒精相关危害白皮书》在南非的实施情况,并提供一套最终指标。根据Andréasson等人(2009)的框架,使用了一个包含指标类别和类型(即预防、决定因素、消费和酒精相关危害)的逻辑模型来开发一套最初的255个指标。随后的方法过程包括a)对南非医学研究委员会维护的大型电子数据库进行范围界定,b)全面的文献综述,以及c)联系18名国际关键信息提供者。通过电子邮件、电话、个人和多人面对面会议与不同政府实体的利益相关者进行迭代沟通,以及研究团队参与的共识过程,用于完善指标。最后一套指标包括176项指标;108个(61.4%)是“核心”指标,68个(38.6%)是“扩展”指标,这意味着它们添加到了特定领域的核心指标中,这些指标很有用,但优先级较低或可能不太容易获得。在核心指标中,45项(42.4%)被总理办公室的政策制定者/研究人员视为“高水平指标”,表明它们是最重要的。这份手稿表明,制定基于证据的、针对具体地点的指标来评估政策实施是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing Indicators to Measure the Implementation of the Western Cape Alcohol Harms Reduction Strategy in South Africa
This manuscript describes a process to develop a set of indicators to monitor and evaluate the implementation of the Western Cape Alcohol-Related Harms Reduction (AHR) White Paper in South Africa and provide a final set of indicators. Drawing on the framework in Andréasson et al. (2009), a logic model with categories and types of indicators (i.e. prevention, determinants, consumption, and alcohol-related harms) was used to develop an initial set of 255 indicators. The methodological process followed involved a) scoping of a large electronic database maintained by the South African Medical Research Council, b) a comprehensive literature review and, c) reaching out to18 international key informants. Iterative communications with stakeholders from diverse government entities via email, telephone calls and individual and multi-person face-to-face meetings, together with a consensus process involving the study team was used to refine the indicators. The final set included 176 indicators; 108, (61.4%) of these were “core” indicators, and 68 (38.6%) were “expanded” indicators, meaning they added to the core indicators in given areas which would be useful to have but are of a lower priority or are likely to be less easy to obtain. Of the core indicators, 45 (42.4%) were deemed by policy makers/researchers in the Premier’s office as “high-level indicators,” denoting that they were the most essential. This manuscript demonstrates that it is possible to develop evidence-based, location-specific indicators to evaluate policy implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Drug and Alcohol Studies
African Journal of Drug and Alcohol Studies Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信