印度尼西亚宪法法院2017年第22号判决中伊斯兰规范的存在

Lindi Rohma Octavia, Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy
{"title":"印度尼西亚宪法法院2017年第22号判决中伊斯兰规范的存在","authors":"Lindi Rohma Octavia, Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy","doi":"10.21070/jihr.2020.7.720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study discusses the existence of Islamic norms in the Constitutional Court decisions. This study uses a case approach by examining the Constitutional Court decision no. 22 / PUU-XV / 2017. Data obtained from primary, secondary and tertiary data relating to legal issues in this paper. The main problem in this research is the consideration and decision of the Constitutional Court on the case decision No. 22 / PUU-XV / 2017 concerning marriage which is quite highlighted by the Indonesian people. What was tested in the a quo decision was article 7 paragraph (1) of Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage with article 27 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution as a touchstone. In the a quo decision the petitioners argued that article 7 paragraph (1) was an article that was discriminatory for women. On the a quo decision, the panel of judges granted part of the petition's petition. the legal consequence of the Constitutional Court decision No. 22 / PUU-XV / 2017 is the emergence of Law No. 16 of 2019, amendments to Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning marriage","PeriodicalId":31020,"journal":{"name":"Rechtsidee","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Existence of Islamic Norms in the Indonesia Constitutional Court Decisions No.22/PUU-XV/2017\",\"authors\":\"Lindi Rohma Octavia, Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy\",\"doi\":\"10.21070/jihr.2020.7.720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study discusses the existence of Islamic norms in the Constitutional Court decisions. This study uses a case approach by examining the Constitutional Court decision no. 22 / PUU-XV / 2017. Data obtained from primary, secondary and tertiary data relating to legal issues in this paper. The main problem in this research is the consideration and decision of the Constitutional Court on the case decision No. 22 / PUU-XV / 2017 concerning marriage which is quite highlighted by the Indonesian people. What was tested in the a quo decision was article 7 paragraph (1) of Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage with article 27 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution as a touchstone. In the a quo decision the petitioners argued that article 7 paragraph (1) was an article that was discriminatory for women. On the a quo decision, the panel of judges granted part of the petition's petition. the legal consequence of the Constitutional Court decision No. 22 / PUU-XV / 2017 is the emergence of Law No. 16 of 2019, amendments to Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning marriage\",\"PeriodicalId\":31020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rechtsidee\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rechtsidee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.2020.7.720\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rechtsidee","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.2020.7.720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨伊斯兰教规范在宪法法院判决中的存在。本研究采用个案研究的方法,检视宪法法院第1号判决。22 / puu-xv / 2017。从与本文中的法律问题有关的初级、二级和三级数据中获得的数据。本研究的主要问题是宪法法院对印度尼西亚人民非常强调的关于婚姻的第22 / PUU-XV / 2017号案件决定的审议和决定。在维持现状的决定中检验的是1974年关于婚姻的第1号法第7条第1款,并以1945年《宪法》第27条第1款作为试金石。在维持现状的决定中,请愿者争辩说,第7条第(1)款是一项歧视妇女的条款。关于维持现状的决定,法官小组批准了部分请愿书的请求。宪法法院第22 / PUU-XV / 2017号决定的法律后果是产生了2019年第16号法律,即对1974年第1号关于婚姻的法律的修正案
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Existence of Islamic Norms in the Indonesia Constitutional Court Decisions No.22/PUU-XV/2017
This study discusses the existence of Islamic norms in the Constitutional Court decisions. This study uses a case approach by examining the Constitutional Court decision no. 22 / PUU-XV / 2017. Data obtained from primary, secondary and tertiary data relating to legal issues in this paper. The main problem in this research is the consideration and decision of the Constitutional Court on the case decision No. 22 / PUU-XV / 2017 concerning marriage which is quite highlighted by the Indonesian people. What was tested in the a quo decision was article 7 paragraph (1) of Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage with article 27 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution as a touchstone. In the a quo decision the petitioners argued that article 7 paragraph (1) was an article that was discriminatory for women. On the a quo decision, the panel of judges granted part of the petition's petition. the legal consequence of the Constitutional Court decision No. 22 / PUU-XV / 2017 is the emergence of Law No. 16 of 2019, amendments to Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning marriage
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信