“无论我们走到哪里,它只会指南针”:蒙太尼论文的不规范

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Marina Perkins
{"title":"“无论我们走到哪里,它只会指南针”:蒙太尼论文的不规范","authors":"Marina Perkins","doi":"10.1353/mlr.2023.a901111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Throughout the Essais, Montaigne dwells on the mechanics of communication, considering the role of intention and inference in interpretation. His cognitively inflected approach to communication resonates with the account of utterance interpretation offered by relevance theory in the field of pragmatics. Relevance theory elucidates patterns across Montaigne’s discussions of apparently disparate communicative domains in the Essais. This article demonstrates the point by examining his portrayals of exchanges in diplomacy and jurisprudence, and the account he offers of his own authorial communication, with reference to underspecification, relevance theory’s notion that utterances provide only sparse evidence of the speaker’s intended meaning.","PeriodicalId":45399,"journal":{"name":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","volume":"118 1","pages":"328 - 348"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Il guigne seulement du doigt par où nous irons’: Underspecification in Montaigne’s Essais\",\"authors\":\"Marina Perkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/mlr.2023.a901111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Throughout the Essais, Montaigne dwells on the mechanics of communication, considering the role of intention and inference in interpretation. His cognitively inflected approach to communication resonates with the account of utterance interpretation offered by relevance theory in the field of pragmatics. Relevance theory elucidates patterns across Montaigne’s discussions of apparently disparate communicative domains in the Essais. This article demonstrates the point by examining his portrayals of exchanges in diplomacy and jurisprudence, and the account he offers of his own authorial communication, with reference to underspecification, relevance theory’s notion that utterances provide only sparse evidence of the speaker’s intended meaning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"328 - 348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2023.a901111\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2023.a901111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:蒙田在《论文集》中对交际机制进行了深入探讨,探讨了意图和推理在解释中的作用。他的认知变形交际方法与语用学领域的关联理论对话语解释的解释产生了共鸣。关联理论阐明了蒙田在《散文集》中对明显不同的交际领域的讨论模式。本文通过考察他对外交和法学交流的描述,以及他对自己的作者交流的描述来论证这一点,并参考了不规范的关联理论,即话语只提供了说话人意图的稀疏证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Il guigne seulement du doigt par où nous irons’: Underspecification in Montaigne’s Essais
Abstract:Throughout the Essais, Montaigne dwells on the mechanics of communication, considering the role of intention and inference in interpretation. His cognitively inflected approach to communication resonates with the account of utterance interpretation offered by relevance theory in the field of pragmatics. Relevance theory elucidates patterns across Montaigne’s discussions of apparently disparate communicative domains in the Essais. This article demonstrates the point by examining his portrayals of exchanges in diplomacy and jurisprudence, and the account he offers of his own authorial communication, with reference to underspecification, relevance theory’s notion that utterances provide only sparse evidence of the speaker’s intended meaning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: With an unbroken publication record since 1905, its 1248 pages are divided between articles, predominantly on medieval and modern literature, in the languages of continental Europe, together with English (including the United States and the Commonwealth), Francophone Africa and Canada, and Latin America. In addition, MLR reviews over five hundred books each year The MLR Supplement The Modern Language Review was founded in 1905 and has included well over 3,000 articles and some 20,000 book reviews. This supplement to Volume 100 is published by the Modern Humanities Research Association in celebration of the centenary of its flagship journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信