桡骨远端骨折ORIF术后的康复轨迹

Pub Date : 2023-07-13 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1771045
Gabriel Larose, Darren M Roffey, Henry M Broekhuyse, Pierre Guy, Peter O'Brien, Kelly A Lefaivre
{"title":"桡骨远端骨折ORIF术后的康复轨迹","authors":"Gabriel Larose, Darren M Roffey, Henry M Broekhuyse, Pierre Guy, Peter O'Brien, Kelly A Lefaivre","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Distal radius fractures are commonly seen among the elderly, though studies examining their long-term outcomes are limited. <b>Purpose</b>  The aim of this study was to describe the 5-year trajectory of recovery of distal radius fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). <b>Methods</b>  Patients with distal radius fractures (AO/OTA 23.A-C) treated by ORIF were prospectively studied. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score was measured at baseline (preinjury recall) and postoperatively at 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years. Clinically relevant change in PRWE score was assessed using the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). <b>Results</b>  A total of 390 patients were included, of which 75% completed 5-year follow-up. Mean baseline PRWE score was 1.25 (standard deviation, SD: 2.9). At 6 months, mean PRWE score was at its highest up to 20.2 (SD: 18.4; <i>p</i>  < 0.01). A significant improvement in mean PRWE score was observed at 1 year down to 15.2 (SD: 17.6; <i>p</i>  < 0.01); 44% of patients were still one MCID outside of their baseline PRWE score at 1 year. Further significant improvement in mean PRWE score occurred at 5 years down to 9.4 (SD: 13.4; <i>p</i>  < 0.01); 29% of patients remained one MCID outside of their baseline PRWE score at 5 years. <b>Conclusion</b>  Recovery after ORIF for distal radius fractures showed significant worsening after surgery, followed by significant improvements up to 1 year and between years 1 and 5, albeit to a lesser extent. Statistically and clinically relevant wrist pain and disability persisted at 5 years. Future research should examine different treatment modalities and include a nonoperative treatment arm for comparison. <b>Level of Evidence</b>  Prognostic level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trajectory of Recovery following ORIF for Distal Radius Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Larose, Darren M Roffey, Henry M Broekhuyse, Pierre Guy, Peter O'Brien, Kelly A Lefaivre\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1771045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Distal radius fractures are commonly seen among the elderly, though studies examining their long-term outcomes are limited. <b>Purpose</b>  The aim of this study was to describe the 5-year trajectory of recovery of distal radius fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). <b>Methods</b>  Patients with distal radius fractures (AO/OTA 23.A-C) treated by ORIF were prospectively studied. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score was measured at baseline (preinjury recall) and postoperatively at 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years. Clinically relevant change in PRWE score was assessed using the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). <b>Results</b>  A total of 390 patients were included, of which 75% completed 5-year follow-up. Mean baseline PRWE score was 1.25 (standard deviation, SD: 2.9). At 6 months, mean PRWE score was at its highest up to 20.2 (SD: 18.4; <i>p</i>  < 0.01). A significant improvement in mean PRWE score was observed at 1 year down to 15.2 (SD: 17.6; <i>p</i>  < 0.01); 44% of patients were still one MCID outside of their baseline PRWE score at 1 year. Further significant improvement in mean PRWE score occurred at 5 years down to 9.4 (SD: 13.4; <i>p</i>  < 0.01); 29% of patients remained one MCID outside of their baseline PRWE score at 5 years. <b>Conclusion</b>  Recovery after ORIF for distal radius fractures showed significant worsening after surgery, followed by significant improvements up to 1 year and between years 1 and 5, albeit to a lesser extent. Statistically and clinically relevant wrist pain and disability persisted at 5 years. Future research should examine different treatment modalities and include a nonoperative treatment arm for comparison. <b>Level of Evidence</b>  Prognostic level II.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129881/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要背景 桡骨远端骨折在老年人中常见,尽管对其长期结果的研究有限。意图 本研究的目的是描述桡骨远端骨折采用切开复位内固定术(ORIF)治疗的5年恢复轨迹。方法 对接受ORIF治疗的桡骨远端骨折(AO/OTA 23.A-C)患者进行前瞻性研究。在基线(损伤前回忆)和术后6个月、1年和5年测量患者评分腕关节评估(PRWE)评分。使用最小临床重要差异(MCID)评估PRWE评分的临床相关变化。后果 共纳入390名患者,其中75%完成了5年随访。平均基线PRWE评分为1.25(标准差,SD:2.9)。6个月时,平均PRWE得分最高,达到20.2(SD:18.4;p < 0.01)。1年时观察到平均PRWE评分显著改善,降至15.2(SD:17.6;p < 0.01);44%的患者在1年时仍有一个MCID超出其基线PRWE评分。平均PRWE评分在5年后进一步显著改善,降至9.4(SD:13.4;p < 0.01);29%的患者在5年时仍有一个MCID超出其基线PRWE评分。结论 桡骨远端骨折ORIF后的恢复情况在手术后明显恶化,随后在1年内和1至5年之间有显著改善,尽管程度较小。统计和临床相关的手腕疼痛和残疾持续了5年。未来的研究应该检查不同的治疗方式,并包括非手术治疗组进行比较。证据级别 预后等级II。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Trajectory of Recovery following ORIF for Distal Radius Fractures.

Background  Distal radius fractures are commonly seen among the elderly, though studies examining their long-term outcomes are limited. Purpose  The aim of this study was to describe the 5-year trajectory of recovery of distal radius fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Methods  Patients with distal radius fractures (AO/OTA 23.A-C) treated by ORIF were prospectively studied. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score was measured at baseline (preinjury recall) and postoperatively at 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years. Clinically relevant change in PRWE score was assessed using the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Results  A total of 390 patients were included, of which 75% completed 5-year follow-up. Mean baseline PRWE score was 1.25 (standard deviation, SD: 2.9). At 6 months, mean PRWE score was at its highest up to 20.2 (SD: 18.4; p  < 0.01). A significant improvement in mean PRWE score was observed at 1 year down to 15.2 (SD: 17.6; p  < 0.01); 44% of patients were still one MCID outside of their baseline PRWE score at 1 year. Further significant improvement in mean PRWE score occurred at 5 years down to 9.4 (SD: 13.4; p  < 0.01); 29% of patients remained one MCID outside of their baseline PRWE score at 5 years. Conclusion  Recovery after ORIF for distal radius fractures showed significant worsening after surgery, followed by significant improvements up to 1 year and between years 1 and 5, albeit to a lesser extent. Statistically and clinically relevant wrist pain and disability persisted at 5 years. Future research should examine different treatment modalities and include a nonoperative treatment arm for comparison. Level of Evidence  Prognostic level II.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信