阿尔都塞和绝对开端

IF 0.8 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Rodrigo Steimberg
{"title":"阿尔都塞和绝对开端","authors":"Rodrigo Steimberg","doi":"10.1080/08935696.2022.2026748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay engages the debate around the Althusserian concept of the void, presented in “The Underground Current of the Materialism of the Encounter.” While Althusser claimed that an aleatory void is needed for a structural transformation to take place, his commentators object to linking the concepts of the void and the encounter. However, both Althusser and his commentators rely on the concept of the pure void to explain such a transformation, an idea that Hegel rejects. This essay shows that Hegel’s dialectics already provide a conceptual framework for grasping the transformation of social structures resulting from internal contradictions.","PeriodicalId":45610,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Althusser and the Absolute Beginning\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Steimberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08935696.2022.2026748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay engages the debate around the Althusserian concept of the void, presented in “The Underground Current of the Materialism of the Encounter.” While Althusser claimed that an aleatory void is needed for a structural transformation to take place, his commentators object to linking the concepts of the void and the encounter. However, both Althusser and his commentators rely on the concept of the pure void to explain such a transformation, an idea that Hegel rejects. This essay shows that Hegel’s dialectics already provide a conceptual framework for grasping the transformation of social structures resulting from internal contradictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2026748\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2026748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文围绕阿尔都塞的虚空概念展开辩论,该概念在《相遇的唯物主义的地下流》中提出。虽然阿尔都塞声称,结构转变的发生需要一个选择性的虚空,但他的评论家反对将虚空和遭遇的概念联系起来。然而,阿尔都塞和他的评论家们都依赖于纯粹虚空的概念来解释这种转变,这是黑格尔所拒绝的。黑格尔的辩证法已经为把握由内部矛盾引起的社会结构的转变提供了一个概念框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Althusser and the Absolute Beginning
This essay engages the debate around the Althusserian concept of the void, presented in “The Underground Current of the Materialism of the Encounter.” While Althusser claimed that an aleatory void is needed for a structural transformation to take place, his commentators object to linking the concepts of the void and the encounter. However, both Althusser and his commentators rely on the concept of the pure void to explain such a transformation, an idea that Hegel rejects. This essay shows that Hegel’s dialectics already provide a conceptual framework for grasping the transformation of social structures resulting from internal contradictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信