支持马拉维实施预防艾滋病毒母婴传播的指导方针:一项多案例研究

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Chifundo Zimba, Gwen Sherwood, Barbara Mark, Jeenifer Leeman
{"title":"支持马拉维实施预防艾滋病毒母婴传播的指导方针:一项多案例研究","authors":"Chifundo Zimba, Gwen Sherwood, Barbara Mark, Jeenifer Leeman","doi":"10.4314/mmj.v33i3.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High HIV infection and fertility rates contributed to over 12,000 children acquiring HIV from their mothers in 2011 in Malawi. To prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV, Malawi adopted the Option B+ guidelines, and for three years, the University of North Carolina (UNC) Project provided support to strengthen guideline implementation in 134 health centres. Little is known about how implementation support strategies are delivered in low resource countries or contextual factors that may influence their delivery. The limited descriptions of support strategies and salient contextual factors limits efforts to replicate, target, and further refine strategies. Guided by the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation, this study describes factors influencing implementation of support strategies and how they impacted health center staff capacity to implement Option B+ in Malawi.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative multi-case study design was applied. Data were collected through site visits to 4 heath centres (2 low- and 2-high performing centres). We interviewed 18 support providers and recipients between October 2014 and October 2015. Data were analysed using content, thematic, and cross-case analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four categories of strategies were used to support Option B+ guidelines implementation: training, technical assistance (TA), tools, and resources. All heath-centres implemented Option B+ guidelines for care provided between the antenatal and labor and delivery periods. Gaps in Option B+ implementation occurred during community activities and during post-delivery care, including gaps in testing of children to ascertain their HIV status at 6 weeks, 12 months, and 24 months. Salient contextual factors included staffing shortages, transportation challenges, limited space and infrastructure, limited stocks of HIV testing kits, and large patient populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding factors that influence implementation support strategies and delivery of the Option B+ guidelines, such as availability of staff and other materials/drug resources, is critical to designing effective implementation support for low resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":18185,"journal":{"name":"Malawi Medical Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"178-185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting the implementation of guidelines to prevent mother-to-child-transmission of HIV in Malawi: a multi-case study.\",\"authors\":\"Chifundo Zimba, Gwen Sherwood, Barbara Mark, Jeenifer Leeman\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/mmj.v33i3.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High HIV infection and fertility rates contributed to over 12,000 children acquiring HIV from their mothers in 2011 in Malawi. To prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV, Malawi adopted the Option B+ guidelines, and for three years, the University of North Carolina (UNC) Project provided support to strengthen guideline implementation in 134 health centres. Little is known about how implementation support strategies are delivered in low resource countries or contextual factors that may influence their delivery. The limited descriptions of support strategies and salient contextual factors limits efforts to replicate, target, and further refine strategies. Guided by the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation, this study describes factors influencing implementation of support strategies and how they impacted health center staff capacity to implement Option B+ in Malawi.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative multi-case study design was applied. Data were collected through site visits to 4 heath centres (2 low- and 2-high performing centres). We interviewed 18 support providers and recipients between October 2014 and October 2015. Data were analysed using content, thematic, and cross-case analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four categories of strategies were used to support Option B+ guidelines implementation: training, technical assistance (TA), tools, and resources. All heath-centres implemented Option B+ guidelines for care provided between the antenatal and labor and delivery periods. Gaps in Option B+ implementation occurred during community activities and during post-delivery care, including gaps in testing of children to ascertain their HIV status at 6 weeks, 12 months, and 24 months. Salient contextual factors included staffing shortages, transportation challenges, limited space and infrastructure, limited stocks of HIV testing kits, and large patient populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding factors that influence implementation support strategies and delivery of the Option B+ guidelines, such as availability of staff and other materials/drug resources, is critical to designing effective implementation support for low resource settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malawi Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"178-185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843178/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malawi Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/mmj.v33i3.5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malawi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/mmj.v33i3.5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2011年,马拉维艾滋病毒感染率和生育率高,导致1.2万多名儿童从母亲那里感染艾滋病毒。为了防止艾滋病毒母婴传播,马拉维采用了“B+方案”准则,在三年中,北卡罗来纳大学项目提供了支助,以加强134个保健中心准则的执行。对于在资源匮乏的国家如何实施支助战略或可能影响其实施的环境因素知之甚少。对支持策略的有限描述和显著的上下文因素限制了复制、定位和进一步完善策略的努力。在传播和实施互动系统框架的指导下,本研究描述了影响支持战略实施的因素,以及这些因素如何影响马拉维卫生中心工作人员实施B+方案的能力。方法采用定性多病例研究设计。通过对4个保健中心(2个低绩效中心和2个高绩效中心)的实地访问收集数据。2014年10月至2015年10月期间,我们采访了18位支持提供者和接受者。数据分析采用内容分析、专题分析和跨案例分析。结果四类策略被用于支持选项B+指南的实施:培训、技术援助(TA)、工具和资源。所有保健中心都执行了关于产前和分娩期间提供护理的备选方案B+准则。在社区活动和产后护理期间,在实施备选方案B+方面存在差距,包括在6周、12个月和24个月时对儿童进行艾滋病毒检测以确定其艾滋病毒状况方面存在差距。突出的环境因素包括人员短缺、交通困难、空间和基础设施有限、艾滋病毒检测试剂盒库存有限以及患者人数众多。了解影响实施支持策略和“选项B+”指南交付的因素,如人员和其他材料/药物资源的可用性,对于在资源匮乏的环境中设计有效的实施支持至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supporting the implementation of guidelines to prevent mother-to-child-transmission of HIV in Malawi: a multi-case study.

Background: High HIV infection and fertility rates contributed to over 12,000 children acquiring HIV from their mothers in 2011 in Malawi. To prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV, Malawi adopted the Option B+ guidelines, and for three years, the University of North Carolina (UNC) Project provided support to strengthen guideline implementation in 134 health centres. Little is known about how implementation support strategies are delivered in low resource countries or contextual factors that may influence their delivery. The limited descriptions of support strategies and salient contextual factors limits efforts to replicate, target, and further refine strategies. Guided by the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation, this study describes factors influencing implementation of support strategies and how they impacted health center staff capacity to implement Option B+ in Malawi.

Methods: A qualitative multi-case study design was applied. Data were collected through site visits to 4 heath centres (2 low- and 2-high performing centres). We interviewed 18 support providers and recipients between October 2014 and October 2015. Data were analysed using content, thematic, and cross-case analysis.

Results: Four categories of strategies were used to support Option B+ guidelines implementation: training, technical assistance (TA), tools, and resources. All heath-centres implemented Option B+ guidelines for care provided between the antenatal and labor and delivery periods. Gaps in Option B+ implementation occurred during community activities and during post-delivery care, including gaps in testing of children to ascertain their HIV status at 6 weeks, 12 months, and 24 months. Salient contextual factors included staffing shortages, transportation challenges, limited space and infrastructure, limited stocks of HIV testing kits, and large patient populations.

Conclusions: Understanding factors that influence implementation support strategies and delivery of the Option B+ guidelines, such as availability of staff and other materials/drug resources, is critical to designing effective implementation support for low resource settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Malawi Medical Journal
Malawi Medical Journal Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Driven and guided by the priorities articulated in the Malawi National Health Research Agenda, the Malawi Medical Journal publishes original research, short reports, case reports, viewpoints, insightful editorials and commentaries that are of high quality, informative and applicable to the Malawian and sub-Saharan Africa regions. Our particular interest is to publish evidence-based research that impacts and informs national health policies and medical practice in Malawi and the broader region. Topics covered in the journal include, but are not limited to: - Communicable diseases (HIV and AIDS, Malaria, TB, etc.) - Non-communicable diseases (Cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes, etc.) - Sexual and Reproductive Health (Adolescent health, education, pregnancy and abortion, STDs and HIV and AIDS, etc.) - Mental health - Environmental health - Nutrition - Health systems and health policy (Leadership, ethics, and governance) - Community systems strengthening research - Injury, trauma, and surgical disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信