拉丁美洲对葛兰西的解读与玻利维亚本土民族主义国家

IF 0.6 Q4 ETHNIC STUDIES
M. Coletta, Malayna Raftopoulos
{"title":"拉丁美洲对葛兰西的解读与玻利维亚本土民族主义国家","authors":"M. Coletta, Malayna Raftopoulos","doi":"10.1080/17442222.2020.1805845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article engages critically with recent theories on the eclipse of Gramsci’s notion of hegemony in the face of twenty-first-century practices of grassroots activism. It demonstrates how hegemony, and other concepts reworked from Gramscian thought, have been used as the theoretical basis for assimilating indigeneity into a new form of nationalism in Bolivia. The first section of this piece examines the role of Gramscian thought in the emergence of Latin American decolonial thinking, while the second section maps out its most influential Bolivian interpretations. Finally, the third section shows how these principles have played out in the MAS movement and Evo Morales’ presidencies (2006–2019). This article argues that the Morales administration, by weaving concepts of Gramscian provenance such as ‘motley society’ and the ‘apparent state’ into the Plurinational principle, created a new nationalist conservatism in the form of a hegemonic indigenous state that contradicts the basic theoretical and legal premises of Plurinationality.","PeriodicalId":35038,"journal":{"name":"Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"47 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17442222.2020.1805845","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Latin American readings of Gramsci and the Bolivian indigenous nationalist state\",\"authors\":\"M. Coletta, Malayna Raftopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17442222.2020.1805845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article engages critically with recent theories on the eclipse of Gramsci’s notion of hegemony in the face of twenty-first-century practices of grassroots activism. It demonstrates how hegemony, and other concepts reworked from Gramscian thought, have been used as the theoretical basis for assimilating indigeneity into a new form of nationalism in Bolivia. The first section of this piece examines the role of Gramscian thought in the emergence of Latin American decolonial thinking, while the second section maps out its most influential Bolivian interpretations. Finally, the third section shows how these principles have played out in the MAS movement and Evo Morales’ presidencies (2006–2019). This article argues that the Morales administration, by weaving concepts of Gramscian provenance such as ‘motley society’ and the ‘apparent state’ into the Plurinational principle, created a new nationalist conservatism in the form of a hegemonic indigenous state that contradicts the basic theoretical and legal premises of Plurinationality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"47 - 62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17442222.2020.1805845\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17442222.2020.1805845\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17442222.2020.1805845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

摘要:本文批判性地探讨了葛兰西霸权观在21世纪草根激进主义实践中的衰落。它展示了霸权和其他从葛兰西思想改编而来的概念是如何被用作将土著同化为玻利维亚新形式民族主义的理论基础的。这篇文章的第一节探讨了葛兰西思想在拉丁美洲非殖民化思想出现中的作用,而第二节则阐述了其最具影响力的玻利维亚解释。最后,第三部分展示了这些原则在MAS运动和埃沃·莫拉莱斯总统任期(2006-2019)中的表现。本文认为,莫拉莱斯政府通过将“混杂社会”和“明显国家”等Gramscian起源的概念融入多民族主义原则,创造了一种新的民族主义保守主义,其形式是一个霸权的土著国家,与多民族主义的基本理论和法律前提相矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Latin American readings of Gramsci and the Bolivian indigenous nationalist state
ABSTRACT This article engages critically with recent theories on the eclipse of Gramsci’s notion of hegemony in the face of twenty-first-century practices of grassroots activism. It demonstrates how hegemony, and other concepts reworked from Gramscian thought, have been used as the theoretical basis for assimilating indigeneity into a new form of nationalism in Bolivia. The first section of this piece examines the role of Gramscian thought in the emergence of Latin American decolonial thinking, while the second section maps out its most influential Bolivian interpretations. Finally, the third section shows how these principles have played out in the MAS movement and Evo Morales’ presidencies (2006–2019). This article argues that the Morales administration, by weaving concepts of Gramscian provenance such as ‘motley society’ and the ‘apparent state’ into the Plurinational principle, created a new nationalist conservatism in the form of a hegemonic indigenous state that contradicts the basic theoretical and legal premises of Plurinationality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies
Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信