奥运会是机遇还是神话?2018平昌冬奥会的案例和可能被证明是一个矛盾的概念

IF 1.8 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Charles Mountifield, Stirling Sharpe
{"title":"奥运会是机遇还是神话?2018平昌冬奥会的案例和可能被证明是一个矛盾的概念","authors":"Charles Mountifield, Stirling Sharpe","doi":"10.1080/24704067.2020.1774959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper highlights contrasting viewpoints on the perceived value that the Olympic Games make to world peace efforts through the lens of the 2018 Winter Olympics in PyeongChang, South Korea. News articles (n = 114) from a variety of international periodicals were reviewed and thematically analyzed with key nascent tropes – cynicism of the potential for peace; scorn of the role of sport in peace processes; and high-level political meddling in sport – pointing to a consensus that hosting of the Games would have little impact on the political landscape in the Korean peninsula. These threads are then considered in connection with the concepts of peace, national interests and international relations established through a review of literature including recounts of Olympic state-based action, interference and influence since the modern inception of the Olympic Games. The evidence indicates that the concept of Olympism as a peace movement is outmoded; a myth that endures because international sport contains an inherent political utility.","PeriodicalId":36658,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Sport Management","volume":"8 1","pages":"117 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24704067.2020.1774959","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are the Olympic Games an opportunity or a myth? The case of PyeongChang 2018 and What May Prove to Be a Paradoxical Notion\",\"authors\":\"Charles Mountifield, Stirling Sharpe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24704067.2020.1774959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper highlights contrasting viewpoints on the perceived value that the Olympic Games make to world peace efforts through the lens of the 2018 Winter Olympics in PyeongChang, South Korea. News articles (n = 114) from a variety of international periodicals were reviewed and thematically analyzed with key nascent tropes – cynicism of the potential for peace; scorn of the role of sport in peace processes; and high-level political meddling in sport – pointing to a consensus that hosting of the Games would have little impact on the political landscape in the Korean peninsula. These threads are then considered in connection with the concepts of peace, national interests and international relations established through a review of literature including recounts of Olympic state-based action, interference and influence since the modern inception of the Olympic Games. The evidence indicates that the concept of Olympism as a peace movement is outmoded; a myth that endures because international sport contains an inherent political utility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Sport Management\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"117 - 138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24704067.2020.1774959\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Sport Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24704067.2020.1774959\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Sport Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24704067.2020.1774959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文通过2018年韩国平昌冬奥会的视角,强调了对奥运会对世界和平努力的感知价值的对比观点。新闻文章(n = 114)进行了回顾和主题分析,并使用了关键的新兴比喻——对和平潜力的冷嘲热讽;蔑视体育在和平进程中的作用;以及高层对体育的政治干预——这表明人们一致认为,举办奥运会对朝鲜半岛的政治格局影响不大。然后,这些线索与和平、国家利益和国际关系的概念联系在一起,这些概念是通过对文献的回顾而建立的,包括对奥运会现代成立以来基于国家的行动、干预和影响的叙述。证据表明,奥林匹克主义作为和平运动的概念已经过时;这个神话之所以经久不衰,是因为国际体育包含着固有的政治效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are the Olympic Games an opportunity or a myth? The case of PyeongChang 2018 and What May Prove to Be a Paradoxical Notion
Abstract This paper highlights contrasting viewpoints on the perceived value that the Olympic Games make to world peace efforts through the lens of the 2018 Winter Olympics in PyeongChang, South Korea. News articles (n = 114) from a variety of international periodicals were reviewed and thematically analyzed with key nascent tropes – cynicism of the potential for peace; scorn of the role of sport in peace processes; and high-level political meddling in sport – pointing to a consensus that hosting of the Games would have little impact on the political landscape in the Korean peninsula. These threads are then considered in connection with the concepts of peace, national interests and international relations established through a review of literature including recounts of Olympic state-based action, interference and influence since the modern inception of the Olympic Games. The evidence indicates that the concept of Olympism as a peace movement is outmoded; a myth that endures because international sport contains an inherent political utility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Sport Management
Journal of Global Sport Management Business, Management and Accounting-Strategy and Management
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信