民主的官僚主义:马克斯·韦伯的自由代表制度下的官僚主义-学院-共享行政

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Carlos Eduardo Sell
{"title":"民主的官僚主义:马克斯·韦伯的自由代表制度下的官僚主义-学院-共享行政","authors":"Carlos Eduardo Sell","doi":"10.18764/2236-9473.V18N1P9-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"O artigo analisa os dois tipos ideais de burocracia em Max Weber, a “administracao burocratica monocratica” e a “administracao burocratica colegiada com representacao livre”. Ambos os tipos sao apresentados por Max Weber em lugares separados do capitulo sobre a dominacao, redigido na fase tardia de Economia e Sociedade. A analise comparativo-sistematica dessas duas variantes da administracao burocratica demonstra que, do ponto de vista historico-exegetico, Max Weber buscava integrar analiticamente o tema da democracia no contexto de sua sociologia da dominacao. A partir de tal constatacao sugere-se uma leitura diferenciada de sua teoria politica que explora, alem das tensoes e contradicoes, tambem os nexos estruturais existentes entre a forma racional de dominacao e a democracia. ABSTRACT The article analyzes the two ideal types of bureaucracy in Max Weber, the “monocratic bureaucratic administration” and the “collegiate bureaucratic administration with free representation. Both types are presented by Max Weber in separate places from the chapter on domination written in the late phase of Economics and Society. The comparative-systematic analysis of these two variants of bureaucratic administration demonstrates that, from a historical-exegetical point of view, Max Weber sought to analytically integrate the theme of democracy into the context of hissociology of domination. Based on this observation, a differentiated reading of his political theory is suggested, which explores, in addition to the tensions and contradictions, also the existing structural links between the rational form of domination and the democracy.","PeriodicalId":41488,"journal":{"name":"Revista Pos Ciencias Sociais","volume":"18 1","pages":"9-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BUROCRACIA COM DEMOCRACIA: A ADMINISTRAÇÃO BUROCRÁTICA-COLEGIADA-PARTILHADA COM SISTEMA DE REPRESENTAÇÃO-LIVRE SEGUNDO MAX WEBER BUREAUCRACY WITH DEMOCRACY: THE BUREAUCRATIC-COLLEGIATE ADMINISTRATION WITH FREE-REPRESENTATION SYSTEM ACCORDING TO MAX WEBER\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Eduardo Sell\",\"doi\":\"10.18764/2236-9473.V18N1P9-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"O artigo analisa os dois tipos ideais de burocracia em Max Weber, a “administracao burocratica monocratica” e a “administracao burocratica colegiada com representacao livre”. Ambos os tipos sao apresentados por Max Weber em lugares separados do capitulo sobre a dominacao, redigido na fase tardia de Economia e Sociedade. A analise comparativo-sistematica dessas duas variantes da administracao burocratica demonstra que, do ponto de vista historico-exegetico, Max Weber buscava integrar analiticamente o tema da democracia no contexto de sua sociologia da dominacao. A partir de tal constatacao sugere-se uma leitura diferenciada de sua teoria politica que explora, alem das tensoes e contradicoes, tambem os nexos estruturais existentes entre a forma racional de dominacao e a democracia. ABSTRACT The article analyzes the two ideal types of bureaucracy in Max Weber, the “monocratic bureaucratic administration” and the “collegiate bureaucratic administration with free representation. Both types are presented by Max Weber in separate places from the chapter on domination written in the late phase of Economics and Society. The comparative-systematic analysis of these two variants of bureaucratic administration demonstrates that, from a historical-exegetical point of view, Max Weber sought to analytically integrate the theme of democracy into the context of hissociology of domination. Based on this observation, a differentiated reading of his political theory is suggested, which explores, in addition to the tensions and contradictions, also the existing structural links between the rational form of domination and the democracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Pos Ciencias Sociais\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"9-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Pos Ciencias Sociais\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18764/2236-9473.V18N1P9-24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Pos Ciencias Sociais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18764/2236-9473.V18N1P9-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了马克斯·韦伯理想中的两种官僚主义,即“单一的官僚行政”和“自由代表的学院式官僚行政”。这两种类型都是马克斯·韦伯在《经济学与社会》后期关于支配的章节中分别介绍的。对这两种官僚管理变体的比较系统分析表明,从历史训诫的角度来看,马克斯·韦伯试图在其统治社会学的背景下分析地整合民主主题。从这一发现中,我们可以对他的政治理论进行不同的解读,除了紧张和矛盾之外,还探讨了统治的合理形式与民主之间存在的结构性联系。本文分析了马克斯·韦伯的两种理想官僚主义,“单一的官僚行政”与“具有自由代表权的学院式官僚行政。这两种类型都由马克斯·韦伯在《经济学与社会》后期关于统治的章节中分别介绍。将民主主题放在统治社会学的背景下进行评价。基于这一观察,我们建议对他的政治理论进行差异化解读,该理论除了探讨紧张和矛盾之外,还探讨了理性统治形式与民主之间存在的结构性联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BUROCRACIA COM DEMOCRACIA: A ADMINISTRAÇÃO BUROCRÁTICA-COLEGIADA-PARTILHADA COM SISTEMA DE REPRESENTAÇÃO-LIVRE SEGUNDO MAX WEBER BUREAUCRACY WITH DEMOCRACY: THE BUREAUCRATIC-COLLEGIATE ADMINISTRATION WITH FREE-REPRESENTATION SYSTEM ACCORDING TO MAX WEBER
O artigo analisa os dois tipos ideais de burocracia em Max Weber, a “administracao burocratica monocratica” e a “administracao burocratica colegiada com representacao livre”. Ambos os tipos sao apresentados por Max Weber em lugares separados do capitulo sobre a dominacao, redigido na fase tardia de Economia e Sociedade. A analise comparativo-sistematica dessas duas variantes da administracao burocratica demonstra que, do ponto de vista historico-exegetico, Max Weber buscava integrar analiticamente o tema da democracia no contexto de sua sociologia da dominacao. A partir de tal constatacao sugere-se uma leitura diferenciada de sua teoria politica que explora, alem das tensoes e contradicoes, tambem os nexos estruturais existentes entre a forma racional de dominacao e a democracia. ABSTRACT The article analyzes the two ideal types of bureaucracy in Max Weber, the “monocratic bureaucratic administration” and the “collegiate bureaucratic administration with free representation. Both types are presented by Max Weber in separate places from the chapter on domination written in the late phase of Economics and Society. The comparative-systematic analysis of these two variants of bureaucratic administration demonstrates that, from a historical-exegetical point of view, Max Weber sought to analytically integrate the theme of democracy into the context of hissociology of domination. Based on this observation, a differentiated reading of his political theory is suggested, which explores, in addition to the tensions and contradictions, also the existing structural links between the rational form of domination and the democracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Pos Ciencias Sociais
Revista Pos Ciencias Sociais SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信