北格陵兰岛寒武纪(劳伦提亚)的假蚌与双壳类软体动物的早期进化

IF 1.5 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
J. S. Peel
{"title":"北格陵兰岛寒武纪(劳伦提亚)的假蚌与双壳类软体动物的早期进化","authors":"J. S. Peel","doi":"10.3140/BULL.GEOSCI.1827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"logical studies of present day bivalves that the Ordo­ vician–Recent members of the Class Bivalvia Linnaeus, 1758 form a monophyletic group, although some relation­ ships within the group remain unresolved (Schneider 2001; Giribet 2008; Plazzi et al. 2011; Sharma et al. 2012, 2013; Bieler et al. 2014; González et al. 2015; Lemer et al. 2019). However, the derivation of Bivalvia from ancestral univalved molluscs and its stem group evolution in the Cambrian remains the subject of speculation (Cope 1997, 2000; Carter et al. 2000, 2011; Fang & Sánchez 2012; Cope & Kříž 2013; Ponder et al. 2020). Two Cambrian bivalved groups are recognised as potential ancestors of Bivalvia but their morphological dissimilarity, together with the general absence of material from the late Cambrian (Furongian), obscures the evolutionary pathway. The Order Fordillida Pojeta, 1975 includes Fordilla Barrande, 1881 (Fig. 1L, N) and Pojetaia Jell, 1980 (Fig. 1M) and its oldest members appeared in the Terreneuvian. The Order Tuarangiida MacKinnon, 1982 contains Tuarangia MacKinnon, 1982 (Fig. 1K) and is described from the late Miaolingian Series (Guzhangian Stage), about 20 Ma later. Tuarangia and the youngest specimens of Pojetaia occur together in the Guzhangian of Denmark (Hinz­Schallreuter 2000). Carter et al. (2011) rationalised the dilemma con­ cerning origin(s) by recognising two major divisions of Class Bivalvia. A Grade Euprotobranchia Nevesskaja, 2009 embraced the two orders Fordillida and Tuarangiida, which were considered in some way likely to be an­ cestral to crown group bivalves, but together did not comprise a monophyletic entity. The grade recognises the dichotomy as stem group bivalves between Fordilla and Pojetaia, and Pseudomyona Runnegar 1983 and Tuarangia, discussed by Runnegar & Pojeta (1992), as a result of which Pseudomyona and Tuarangia were not considered to be Bivalvia. Carter et al. (2006) had considered Tuarangia, Pseudomyona, Watsonella Grabau, 1900 (Fig. 1J) and Anabarella Vostokova, 1962 to form a sister group to Pojetaia and Fordilla and post­Cambrian Bivalvia. A Clade Eubivalvia Carter in Carter et al. (2011) included the post­Cambrian groups traditionally regarded as Bivalvia, but Sharma et al. (2013), Bieler et al. (2014) and others considered Fordilla to be a crown group bivalve. Conversely, Ponder et al. (2020, p. 552) placed","PeriodicalId":9332,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Geosciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"195-215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pseudomyona from the Cambrian of North Greenland (Laurentia) and the early evolution of bivalved molluscs\",\"authors\":\"J. S. Peel\",\"doi\":\"10.3140/BULL.GEOSCI.1827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"logical studies of present day bivalves that the Ordo­ vician–Recent members of the Class Bivalvia Linnaeus, 1758 form a monophyletic group, although some relation­ ships within the group remain unresolved (Schneider 2001; Giribet 2008; Plazzi et al. 2011; Sharma et al. 2012, 2013; Bieler et al. 2014; González et al. 2015; Lemer et al. 2019). However, the derivation of Bivalvia from ancestral univalved molluscs and its stem group evolution in the Cambrian remains the subject of speculation (Cope 1997, 2000; Carter et al. 2000, 2011; Fang & Sánchez 2012; Cope & Kříž 2013; Ponder et al. 2020). Two Cambrian bivalved groups are recognised as potential ancestors of Bivalvia but their morphological dissimilarity, together with the general absence of material from the late Cambrian (Furongian), obscures the evolutionary pathway. The Order Fordillida Pojeta, 1975 includes Fordilla Barrande, 1881 (Fig. 1L, N) and Pojetaia Jell, 1980 (Fig. 1M) and its oldest members appeared in the Terreneuvian. The Order Tuarangiida MacKinnon, 1982 contains Tuarangia MacKinnon, 1982 (Fig. 1K) and is described from the late Miaolingian Series (Guzhangian Stage), about 20 Ma later. Tuarangia and the youngest specimens of Pojetaia occur together in the Guzhangian of Denmark (Hinz­Schallreuter 2000). Carter et al. (2011) rationalised the dilemma con­ cerning origin(s) by recognising two major divisions of Class Bivalvia. A Grade Euprotobranchia Nevesskaja, 2009 embraced the two orders Fordillida and Tuarangiida, which were considered in some way likely to be an­ cestral to crown group bivalves, but together did not comprise a monophyletic entity. The grade recognises the dichotomy as stem group bivalves between Fordilla and Pojetaia, and Pseudomyona Runnegar 1983 and Tuarangia, discussed by Runnegar & Pojeta (1992), as a result of which Pseudomyona and Tuarangia were not considered to be Bivalvia. Carter et al. (2006) had considered Tuarangia, Pseudomyona, Watsonella Grabau, 1900 (Fig. 1J) and Anabarella Vostokova, 1962 to form a sister group to Pojetaia and Fordilla and post­Cambrian Bivalvia. A Clade Eubivalvia Carter in Carter et al. (2011) included the post­Cambrian groups traditionally regarded as Bivalvia, but Sharma et al. (2013), Bieler et al. (2014) and others considered Fordilla to be a crown group bivalve. Conversely, Ponder et al. (2020, p. 552) placed\",\"PeriodicalId\":9332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Geosciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"195-215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Geosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3140/BULL.GEOSCI.1827\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3140/BULL.GEOSCI.1827","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

对现代双壳类的逻辑研究表明,1758年林奈双壳类的Ordo - vicii -新近成员形成了一个单系群,尽管该群内的一些关系仍未解决(Schneider 2001;Giribet 2008;Plazzi et al. 2011;Sharma et al. 2012, 2013;Bieler et al. 2014;González et al. 2015;Lemer et al. 2019)。然而,双壳类动物从祖先的单瓣软体动物衍生而来及其在寒武纪的茎群进化仍然是猜测的主题(Cope 1997,2000;Carter et al. 2000, 2011;Fang & Sánchez 2012;Cope & Kříž 2013;Ponder et al. 2020)。两个寒武纪双壳类被认为是双壳类的潜在祖先,但它们形态上的差异,加上普遍缺乏来自晚寒武纪(弗龙纪)的材料,使进化途径变得模糊。1975年的Fordillida Pojeta目包括1881年的Fordilla Barrande(图1L, N)和1980年的Pojetaia Jell(图1M),其最古老的成员出现在Terreneuvian。Tuarangiida MacKinnon, 1982目包含Tuarangia MacKinnon, 1982(图1K),描述于距今约20 Ma的苗岭系晚期(古张期)。Tuarangia和最年轻的Pojetaia一起出现在丹麦的Guzhangian (Hinz-Schallreuter 2000)。Carter等人(2011)通过承认双壳类的两个主要分支来合理化关于起源的困境。A级原鳃亚(Euprotobranchia Nevesskaja), 2009,包括Fordillida和Tuarangiida两个目,它们在某种程度上被认为可能是冠类双壳类的祖先,但一起不构成一个单系实体。该等级将其划分为介于Fordilla和Pojetaia,以及Runnegar和Pojeta(1992)讨论的pseudoomyona Runnegar 1983和Tuarangia之间的茎类双壳类,因此pseudo omyona和Tuarangia不被认为是双壳类。Carter等人(2006)认为Tuarangia, Pseudomyona, Watsonella Grabau, 1900(图1J)和Anabarella Vostokova, 1962构成了Pojetaia和Fordilla以及后寒武纪Bivalvia的姊妹类群。Carter et al.(2011)中的A Clade Eubivalvia Carter包括传统上被认为是双壳类的后寒武纪类群,但Sharma et al.(2013)、Bieler et al.(2014)等人认为Fordilla是冠类双壳类。相反,Ponder et al. (2020, p. 552)认为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pseudomyona from the Cambrian of North Greenland (Laurentia) and the early evolution of bivalved molluscs
logical studies of present day bivalves that the Ordo­ vician–Recent members of the Class Bivalvia Linnaeus, 1758 form a monophyletic group, although some relation­ ships within the group remain unresolved (Schneider 2001; Giribet 2008; Plazzi et al. 2011; Sharma et al. 2012, 2013; Bieler et al. 2014; González et al. 2015; Lemer et al. 2019). However, the derivation of Bivalvia from ancestral univalved molluscs and its stem group evolution in the Cambrian remains the subject of speculation (Cope 1997, 2000; Carter et al. 2000, 2011; Fang & Sánchez 2012; Cope & Kříž 2013; Ponder et al. 2020). Two Cambrian bivalved groups are recognised as potential ancestors of Bivalvia but their morphological dissimilarity, together with the general absence of material from the late Cambrian (Furongian), obscures the evolutionary pathway. The Order Fordillida Pojeta, 1975 includes Fordilla Barrande, 1881 (Fig. 1L, N) and Pojetaia Jell, 1980 (Fig. 1M) and its oldest members appeared in the Terreneuvian. The Order Tuarangiida MacKinnon, 1982 contains Tuarangia MacKinnon, 1982 (Fig. 1K) and is described from the late Miaolingian Series (Guzhangian Stage), about 20 Ma later. Tuarangia and the youngest specimens of Pojetaia occur together in the Guzhangian of Denmark (Hinz­Schallreuter 2000). Carter et al. (2011) rationalised the dilemma con­ cerning origin(s) by recognising two major divisions of Class Bivalvia. A Grade Euprotobranchia Nevesskaja, 2009 embraced the two orders Fordillida and Tuarangiida, which were considered in some way likely to be an­ cestral to crown group bivalves, but together did not comprise a monophyletic entity. The grade recognises the dichotomy as stem group bivalves between Fordilla and Pojetaia, and Pseudomyona Runnegar 1983 and Tuarangia, discussed by Runnegar & Pojeta (1992), as a result of which Pseudomyona and Tuarangia were not considered to be Bivalvia. Carter et al. (2006) had considered Tuarangia, Pseudomyona, Watsonella Grabau, 1900 (Fig. 1J) and Anabarella Vostokova, 1962 to form a sister group to Pojetaia and Fordilla and post­Cambrian Bivalvia. A Clade Eubivalvia Carter in Carter et al. (2011) included the post­Cambrian groups traditionally regarded as Bivalvia, but Sharma et al. (2013), Bieler et al. (2014) and others considered Fordilla to be a crown group bivalve. Conversely, Ponder et al. (2020, p. 552) placed
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Geosciences
Bulletin of Geosciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of Geosciences is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles, and short contributions concerning palaeoenvironmental geology, including palaeontology, stratigraphy, sedimentology, palaeogeography, palaeoecology, palaeoclimatology, geochemistry, mineralogy, geophysics, and related fields. All papers are subject to international peer review, and acceptance is based on quality alone.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信