Akash Bhakare, Ganesh N. Pundkar, R. Baitule, Sanjeev Jaiswal, Sagar Kharat, A. Rokade
{"title":"随机临床试验评估经皮k针固定和Philos钢板治疗外科颈肱骨骨折(两部分和三部分)的功能结局和并发症","authors":"Akash Bhakare, Ganesh N. Pundkar, R. Baitule, Sanjeev Jaiswal, Sagar Kharat, A. Rokade","doi":"10.4103/jodp.jodp_76_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Proximal humeral fracture, whether caused by trauma or osteoporosis, requires meticulously planned individual treatment. The technique and devices used are determined by the quality of bone and soft tissue, age, and reliability of the patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional outcomes and complications of surgical neck humerus fractures (two part and three part) treated by percutaneous K-wire fixation and PHILOS plating. Methodology: The study includes patients with proximal neck humerus fractures (two-part and three-part) according to Neer's classification who underwent open reduction and internal fixation with a PHILOS locking plate and percutaneous K-wire fixation. Functional outcomes and complications were evaluated by the Shoulder Constant score (SCS). Patients were followed up at 1, 3, and 6 month intervals until fracture union. In this study, a total of 76 patients were chosen and divided into two groups, i.e., Group A and Group B, each comprising 38 patients. Patients of Group A were treated with ORIF PHILOS plating and patients of Group B were treated with closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF) percutaneous K-wire fixation. Results: ORIF PHILOS plating was used on 20 (26%) of patients who had an excellent SCS. 10 (13%) patients exhibited a good grade, 5 (6%) patients had a fair grade, and the remaining 3 (4%) patients displayed a poor grade. In Group B, 12 (16%) of patients treated with closed reduction with K-wire fixation had excellent grades, 7 (9%) patients had good grades, 16 (21%) received fair grades, and the remaining 3 (4%) received poor grades. After comparing both treatments, a P value was found to be 0.0403, which shows Group A was more efficient than Group B. Conclusion: The results of our study concluded that, as compared to ORIFPHILOS plating treatment with the CRIF K-wire fixation treatment has poor functional outcomes and a high failure rate. In addition, the surgical treatment of proximal neck humerus fractures (two part and three part) in both groups showed that the PHILOS plating provides an excellent way to achieve the goal, including time of union, fewer complications, and good functional outcomes as compared to percutaneous K-wire.","PeriodicalId":34809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Diseases and Traumatology","volume":"6 1","pages":"142 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized clinical trial to assess functional outcome and complication of surgical neck humerus fracture (two part and three part) treated by percutaneous K-wire fixation and Philos plating\",\"authors\":\"Akash Bhakare, Ganesh N. Pundkar, R. Baitule, Sanjeev Jaiswal, Sagar Kharat, A. Rokade\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jodp.jodp_76_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Proximal humeral fracture, whether caused by trauma or osteoporosis, requires meticulously planned individual treatment. The technique and devices used are determined by the quality of bone and soft tissue, age, and reliability of the patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional outcomes and complications of surgical neck humerus fractures (two part and three part) treated by percutaneous K-wire fixation and PHILOS plating. Methodology: The study includes patients with proximal neck humerus fractures (two-part and three-part) according to Neer's classification who underwent open reduction and internal fixation with a PHILOS locking plate and percutaneous K-wire fixation. Functional outcomes and complications were evaluated by the Shoulder Constant score (SCS). Patients were followed up at 1, 3, and 6 month intervals until fracture union. In this study, a total of 76 patients were chosen and divided into two groups, i.e., Group A and Group B, each comprising 38 patients. Patients of Group A were treated with ORIF PHILOS plating and patients of Group B were treated with closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF) percutaneous K-wire fixation. Results: ORIF PHILOS plating was used on 20 (26%) of patients who had an excellent SCS. 10 (13%) patients exhibited a good grade, 5 (6%) patients had a fair grade, and the remaining 3 (4%) patients displayed a poor grade. In Group B, 12 (16%) of patients treated with closed reduction with K-wire fixation had excellent grades, 7 (9%) patients had good grades, 16 (21%) received fair grades, and the remaining 3 (4%) received poor grades. After comparing both treatments, a P value was found to be 0.0403, which shows Group A was more efficient than Group B. Conclusion: The results of our study concluded that, as compared to ORIFPHILOS plating treatment with the CRIF K-wire fixation treatment has poor functional outcomes and a high failure rate. In addition, the surgical treatment of proximal neck humerus fractures (two part and three part) in both groups showed that the PHILOS plating provides an excellent way to achieve the goal, including time of union, fewer complications, and good functional outcomes as compared to percutaneous K-wire.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Diseases and Traumatology\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"142 - 148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Diseases and Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jodp.jodp_76_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Diseases and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jodp.jodp_76_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肱骨近端骨折,无论是由创伤还是骨质疏松引起,都需要精心计划的个体化治疗。所使用的技术和设备取决于骨和软组织的质量、年龄和患者的可靠性。本研究的目的是评估经皮k针固定和PHILOS钢板治疗手术肱骨颈骨折(两部分和三部分)的功能结局和并发症。方法:该研究纳入了根据Neer分类的肱骨近端颈骨折(两部分和三部分)患者,他们接受了PHILOS锁定钢板和经皮k针固定的切开复位和内固定。功能结局和并发症通过肩部恒定评分(SCS)进行评估。随访时间分别为1、3、6个月,直至骨折愈合。本研究共选取76例患者,分为a组和B组,每组38例。A组患者采用ORIF PHILOS电镀,B组患者采用闭合复位内固定(CRIF)经皮k线固定。结果:20例(26%)SCS良好的患者使用了ORIF PHILOS镀层。10例(13%)患者表现为良好评分,5例(6%)患者表现为一般评分,其余3例(4%)患者表现为差评分。在B组中,12例(16%)患者采用k线闭合复位治疗,7例(9%)患者为良好评分,16例(21%)患者为一般评分,其余3例(4%)患者为不良评分。两种治疗方法比较,P值为0.0403,表明a组有效率高于b组。结论:我们的研究结果表明,与ORIFPHILOS电镀治疗相比,CRIF k -丝固定治疗的功能结局较差,失败率较高。此外,两组肱骨颈近端骨折(两部分和三部分)的手术治疗表明,与经皮k针相比,PHILOS钢板提供了一种很好的方法来实现目标,包括愈合时间,并发症少,功能效果好。
Randomized clinical trial to assess functional outcome and complication of surgical neck humerus fracture (two part and three part) treated by percutaneous K-wire fixation and Philos plating
Background: Proximal humeral fracture, whether caused by trauma or osteoporosis, requires meticulously planned individual treatment. The technique and devices used are determined by the quality of bone and soft tissue, age, and reliability of the patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional outcomes and complications of surgical neck humerus fractures (two part and three part) treated by percutaneous K-wire fixation and PHILOS plating. Methodology: The study includes patients with proximal neck humerus fractures (two-part and three-part) according to Neer's classification who underwent open reduction and internal fixation with a PHILOS locking plate and percutaneous K-wire fixation. Functional outcomes and complications were evaluated by the Shoulder Constant score (SCS). Patients were followed up at 1, 3, and 6 month intervals until fracture union. In this study, a total of 76 patients were chosen and divided into two groups, i.e., Group A and Group B, each comprising 38 patients. Patients of Group A were treated with ORIF PHILOS plating and patients of Group B were treated with closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF) percutaneous K-wire fixation. Results: ORIF PHILOS plating was used on 20 (26%) of patients who had an excellent SCS. 10 (13%) patients exhibited a good grade, 5 (6%) patients had a fair grade, and the remaining 3 (4%) patients displayed a poor grade. In Group B, 12 (16%) of patients treated with closed reduction with K-wire fixation had excellent grades, 7 (9%) patients had good grades, 16 (21%) received fair grades, and the remaining 3 (4%) received poor grades. After comparing both treatments, a P value was found to be 0.0403, which shows Group A was more efficient than Group B. Conclusion: The results of our study concluded that, as compared to ORIFPHILOS plating treatment with the CRIF K-wire fixation treatment has poor functional outcomes and a high failure rate. In addition, the surgical treatment of proximal neck humerus fractures (two part and three part) in both groups showed that the PHILOS plating provides an excellent way to achieve the goal, including time of union, fewer complications, and good functional outcomes as compared to percutaneous K-wire.