与萨蒂尔跨界,田园悲剧的不可抑制的流派弯曲者

IF 0.3 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
E. Nicholson
{"title":"与萨蒂尔跨界,田园悲剧的不可抑制的流派弯曲者","authors":"E. Nicholson","doi":"10.1080/02614340.2020.1893973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Although the ancient Athenian satyr-play was the model for Italian Renaissance pastoral tragicomedy, its chorus of singing and dancing satyrs was suppressed, and these same essential characters were often reduced to a solitary outsider figure representing a violent threat rather than a regenerative force for human communities. My essay asks how and why this reduction became a prevalent dramatic choice, as well as how and why the genre-bending spirit of satyrs nevertheless persisted, with distinct modulations, in many Italian and English plays. Historiographical and theoretical insights from the field of animal studies shape my comparative analysis: these include Donna Haraway’s pluralistic and playfully companionate models of ‘natureculture’ and respect. A key focus is on tensions between anthropocentric and theriophilic attitudes – also expressed through the figure of the ‘Wild-Man’ – and how they inform pastoral productions from Giraldi Cinzio’s Egle to Shakespeare’s Winter’s Tale, revealing the protean vitality of buffoonish, irrepressibly theatrical satyrs.","PeriodicalId":42720,"journal":{"name":"Italianist","volume":"40 1","pages":"342 - 361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02614340.2020.1893973","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crossing Borders with Satyrs, the Irrepressible Genre-Benders of Pastoral Tragicomedy\",\"authors\":\"E. Nicholson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02614340.2020.1893973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Although the ancient Athenian satyr-play was the model for Italian Renaissance pastoral tragicomedy, its chorus of singing and dancing satyrs was suppressed, and these same essential characters were often reduced to a solitary outsider figure representing a violent threat rather than a regenerative force for human communities. My essay asks how and why this reduction became a prevalent dramatic choice, as well as how and why the genre-bending spirit of satyrs nevertheless persisted, with distinct modulations, in many Italian and English plays. Historiographical and theoretical insights from the field of animal studies shape my comparative analysis: these include Donna Haraway’s pluralistic and playfully companionate models of ‘natureculture’ and respect. A key focus is on tensions between anthropocentric and theriophilic attitudes – also expressed through the figure of the ‘Wild-Man’ – and how they inform pastoral productions from Giraldi Cinzio’s Egle to Shakespeare’s Winter’s Tale, revealing the protean vitality of buffoonish, irrepressibly theatrical satyrs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italianist\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"342 - 361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02614340.2020.1893973\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italianist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02614340.2020.1893973\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italianist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02614340.2020.1893973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要尽管古代雅典萨蒂尔戏剧是意大利文艺复兴时期田园悲喜剧的典范,但它的萨蒂尔歌舞合唱却被压抑了,这些重要人物往往沦为一个孤独的局外人,代表着暴力威胁,而不是人类社会的再生力量。我的文章问,这种缩减是如何以及为什么成为一种普遍的戏剧选择的,以及萨蒂尔的风格弯曲精神是如何以及为何在许多意大利和英国戏剧中以不同的调节持续存在的。来自动物研究领域的历史和理论见解塑造了我的比较分析:其中包括唐娜·哈拉韦的“自然文化”和尊重的多元和顽皮的伙伴模式。一个关键的焦点是以人类为中心和亲兽态度之间的紧张关系——也通过“野人”的形象来表达——以及它们如何为从吉拉尔迪·辛齐奥的《Egle》到莎士比亚的《Winter’s Tale》的田园作品提供信息,揭示了滑稽的、压抑不住的戏剧化satyrs的多变活力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Crossing Borders with Satyrs, the Irrepressible Genre-Benders of Pastoral Tragicomedy
ABSTRACT Although the ancient Athenian satyr-play was the model for Italian Renaissance pastoral tragicomedy, its chorus of singing and dancing satyrs was suppressed, and these same essential characters were often reduced to a solitary outsider figure representing a violent threat rather than a regenerative force for human communities. My essay asks how and why this reduction became a prevalent dramatic choice, as well as how and why the genre-bending spirit of satyrs nevertheless persisted, with distinct modulations, in many Italian and English plays. Historiographical and theoretical insights from the field of animal studies shape my comparative analysis: these include Donna Haraway’s pluralistic and playfully companionate models of ‘natureculture’ and respect. A key focus is on tensions between anthropocentric and theriophilic attitudes – also expressed through the figure of the ‘Wild-Man’ – and how they inform pastoral productions from Giraldi Cinzio’s Egle to Shakespeare’s Winter’s Tale, revealing the protean vitality of buffoonish, irrepressibly theatrical satyrs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Italianist
Italianist HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信