电子媒体对小房子的描绘:挑战或再现澳大利亚梦之家

IF 1.2 Q2 Social Sciences
H. Penfold, G. Waitt, P. McGuirk
{"title":"电子媒体对小房子的描绘:挑战或再现澳大利亚梦之家","authors":"H. Penfold, G. Waitt, P. McGuirk","doi":"10.1080/07293682.2019.1632360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Australian home is embedded within social norms that align the ideal dwelling with the large detached suburban house and mass-consumption. In this paper, we present a Foucauldian discourse analysis of Australian electronic media representations of the tiny house to better understand how this dwelling type might challenge the normalisation of the Australian dream home. Our analysis suggests that the tiny house is a crucial site both for contesting and normalising sets of ideas that constitute the Australian dream home. Those advocating for tiny house living tap into narratives of ‘less is more’ and ‘debt free living’ that trouble dominant Australian housing social norms by generating material spaces that suggest affinities with affordability, slower-paced off-grid living, and enhanced sustainability. Yet, the electronic media representation of the tiny house simultaneously reproduces dominant housing social norms around luxury (even ‘in nature’) and a still unfettered material consumption. To conclude we draw out the broad implications of these contradictory media representations of the tiny house for Australian planners.","PeriodicalId":45599,"journal":{"name":"Australian Planner","volume":"55 1","pages":"164 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07293682.2019.1632360","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Portrayals of the tiny house in electronic media: challenging or reproducing the Australian dream home\",\"authors\":\"H. Penfold, G. Waitt, P. McGuirk\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07293682.2019.1632360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The Australian home is embedded within social norms that align the ideal dwelling with the large detached suburban house and mass-consumption. In this paper, we present a Foucauldian discourse analysis of Australian electronic media representations of the tiny house to better understand how this dwelling type might challenge the normalisation of the Australian dream home. Our analysis suggests that the tiny house is a crucial site both for contesting and normalising sets of ideas that constitute the Australian dream home. Those advocating for tiny house living tap into narratives of ‘less is more’ and ‘debt free living’ that trouble dominant Australian housing social norms by generating material spaces that suggest affinities with affordability, slower-paced off-grid living, and enhanced sustainability. Yet, the electronic media representation of the tiny house simultaneously reproduces dominant housing social norms around luxury (even ‘in nature’) and a still unfettered material consumption. To conclude we draw out the broad implications of these contradictory media representations of the tiny house for Australian planners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Planner\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"164 - 173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07293682.2019.1632360\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Planner\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2019.1632360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Planner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2019.1632360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

摘要:澳大利亚的住宅植根于社会规范之中,将理想的住宅与郊区的大型独立住宅和大众消费相结合。在本文中,我们对澳大利亚电子媒体对这座小房子的描述进行了傅科式的话语分析,以更好地了解这种居住类型可能会如何挑战澳大利亚梦想家园的正常化。我们的分析表明,这座小房子是一个关键的场所,既可以对构成澳大利亚梦想家园的一系列想法进行竞争,也可以使其正常化。那些倡导小房子生活的人利用了“少即是多”和“无债务生活”的叙事,这些叙事通过创造物质空间来困扰占主导地位的澳大利亚住房社会规范,这些物质空间暗示着与可负担性、慢节奏的离网生活和增强的可持续性密切相关。然而,这座小房子的电子媒体表现同时再现了围绕奢华(甚至是“自然”)和仍然不受约束的物质消费的主导住房社会规范。最后,我们得出了这些矛盾的媒体对澳大利亚规划者小房子的描述的广泛含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Portrayals of the tiny house in electronic media: challenging or reproducing the Australian dream home
ABSTRACT The Australian home is embedded within social norms that align the ideal dwelling with the large detached suburban house and mass-consumption. In this paper, we present a Foucauldian discourse analysis of Australian electronic media representations of the tiny house to better understand how this dwelling type might challenge the normalisation of the Australian dream home. Our analysis suggests that the tiny house is a crucial site both for contesting and normalising sets of ideas that constitute the Australian dream home. Those advocating for tiny house living tap into narratives of ‘less is more’ and ‘debt free living’ that trouble dominant Australian housing social norms by generating material spaces that suggest affinities with affordability, slower-paced off-grid living, and enhanced sustainability. Yet, the electronic media representation of the tiny house simultaneously reproduces dominant housing social norms around luxury (even ‘in nature’) and a still unfettered material consumption. To conclude we draw out the broad implications of these contradictory media representations of the tiny house for Australian planners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Planner
Australian Planner REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信