阿多诺的世界团结

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
Caleb J. Basnett
{"title":"阿多诺的世界团结","authors":"Caleb J. Basnett","doi":"10.1215/0094033x-10140719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dominant approaches to cosmopolitanism have been criticized for failing to sufficiently account for how power and privilege have entwined with cosmopolitan proposals, and cosmopolitanism itself has been accused of being the ideology of global capitalism. Taking seriously cosmopolitanism’s complicity in domination, this article draws on the work of Theodor W. Adorno to sketch a theory of cosmopolitanism as solidarity. It argues that prominent approaches to cosmopolitanism understand solidarity as an identification of particular with universal, with pernicious political consequences. The article examines three concepts from Adorno’s philosophy that challenge contemporary cosmopolitanism: his concept of “constellations” offers a different way of relating particular to universal; his claim to solidarity with “tormentable bodies” reimagines moral action informed by this transformed relation; and his concept of a “global subject” offers a way to theorize the relation between this moral action and political intervention at the global level.","PeriodicalId":46595,"journal":{"name":"NEW GERMAN CRITIQUE","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adorno’s Cosmopolitan Solidarity\",\"authors\":\"Caleb J. Basnett\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/0094033x-10140719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dominant approaches to cosmopolitanism have been criticized for failing to sufficiently account for how power and privilege have entwined with cosmopolitan proposals, and cosmopolitanism itself has been accused of being the ideology of global capitalism. Taking seriously cosmopolitanism’s complicity in domination, this article draws on the work of Theodor W. Adorno to sketch a theory of cosmopolitanism as solidarity. It argues that prominent approaches to cosmopolitanism understand solidarity as an identification of particular with universal, with pernicious political consequences. The article examines three concepts from Adorno’s philosophy that challenge contemporary cosmopolitanism: his concept of “constellations” offers a different way of relating particular to universal; his claim to solidarity with “tormentable bodies” reimagines moral action informed by this transformed relation; and his concept of a “global subject” offers a way to theorize the relation between this moral action and political intervention at the global level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEW GERMAN CRITIQUE\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEW GERMAN CRITIQUE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033x-10140719\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW GERMAN CRITIQUE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033x-10140719","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界主义的主导方法被批评为未能充分解释权力和特权如何与世界主义提案交织在一起,而世界主义本身也被指责为全球资本主义的意识形态。本文以狄奥多尔·W·阿多诺的著作为蓝本,认真对待世界主义在统治中的共谋,勾画出一种世界主义的团结理论。它认为,突出的世界主义方法将团结理解为对特定与普遍的认同,并产生有害的政治后果。本文考察了阿多诺哲学中挑战当代世界主义的三个概念:他的“星座”概念提供了一种不同的将特殊与普遍联系起来的方式;他声称与“可折磨的身体”团结一致,重新想象了这种转变关系所带来的道德行动;他的“全球主体”概念提供了一种方法来理论化这种道德行为与全球政治干预之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adorno’s Cosmopolitan Solidarity
Dominant approaches to cosmopolitanism have been criticized for failing to sufficiently account for how power and privilege have entwined with cosmopolitan proposals, and cosmopolitanism itself has been accused of being the ideology of global capitalism. Taking seriously cosmopolitanism’s complicity in domination, this article draws on the work of Theodor W. Adorno to sketch a theory of cosmopolitanism as solidarity. It argues that prominent approaches to cosmopolitanism understand solidarity as an identification of particular with universal, with pernicious political consequences. The article examines three concepts from Adorno’s philosophy that challenge contemporary cosmopolitanism: his concept of “constellations” offers a different way of relating particular to universal; his claim to solidarity with “tormentable bodies” reimagines moral action informed by this transformed relation; and his concept of a “global subject” offers a way to theorize the relation between this moral action and political intervention at the global level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NEW GERMAN CRITIQUE
NEW GERMAN CRITIQUE LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Widely considered the top journal in its field, New German Critique is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on twentieth- and twenty-first-century German studies and publishes on a wide array of subjects, including literature, film, and media; literary theory and cultural studies; Holocaust studies; art and architecture; political and social theory; and philosophy. Established in the early 1970s, the journal has played a significant role in introducing U.S. readers to Frankfurt School thinkers and remains an important forum for debate in the humanities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信