欺凌、家庭凝聚力和学校连通性:青少年的有调节中介多组分析

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Lindsey G. Hawkins, Cameron C. Brown, Chloe Goad, Abby Rhynehart, Taralyn Hemphill, Hailey Snyder
{"title":"欺凌、家庭凝聚力和学校连通性:青少年的有调节中介多组分析","authors":"Lindsey G. Hawkins, Cameron C. Brown, Chloe Goad, Abby Rhynehart, Taralyn Hemphill, Hailey Snyder","doi":"10.1080/2692398X.2021.1899738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Bullying experiences in adolescence has become a nationwide problem as 28% of the children report being bullied over the past school year. Adolescents who report being bullied have been found to have higher rates of anxiety and depression. Although several studies have examined family support and school connectedness as protective factors that buffer the link between being bullied and mental health, little is known about racial/ethnic differences in bullying victimization. Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory proposes that a child’s environment (e.g., family cohesion, school connectedness) is a potential protective factor between bullying experiences and mental health. Adolescent data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study were used to analyze a structural model, postulating frequency of being bullied on the adolescents reports of perceived health, directly and as mediated by anxiety symptoms, was assessed among adolescents who were Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, White, Multiracial, and other races not specified in the assessment. Additionally, we examined whether reports of family cohesion and/or school connectedness moderate the link between frequency of being bullied and anxiety. Modest, yet significant results indicated that there were group differences for the model, and school connectedness was linked with lower rates of anxiety symptoms and better reports of perceived health for most groups. These findings provided insight into the importance of considering contextual factors such as race when examining bullying victimization as well as provides insight for school and helping professionals such as family therapists striving to stymie the effects of being bullied among adolescents.","PeriodicalId":29822,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Systemic Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2692398X.2021.1899738","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bullying, family cohesion, and school connectedness: a moderated-mediation multigroup analysis of adolescents\",\"authors\":\"Lindsey G. Hawkins, Cameron C. Brown, Chloe Goad, Abby Rhynehart, Taralyn Hemphill, Hailey Snyder\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2692398X.2021.1899738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Bullying experiences in adolescence has become a nationwide problem as 28% of the children report being bullied over the past school year. Adolescents who report being bullied have been found to have higher rates of anxiety and depression. Although several studies have examined family support and school connectedness as protective factors that buffer the link between being bullied and mental health, little is known about racial/ethnic differences in bullying victimization. Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory proposes that a child’s environment (e.g., family cohesion, school connectedness) is a potential protective factor between bullying experiences and mental health. Adolescent data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study were used to analyze a structural model, postulating frequency of being bullied on the adolescents reports of perceived health, directly and as mediated by anxiety symptoms, was assessed among adolescents who were Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, White, Multiracial, and other races not specified in the assessment. Additionally, we examined whether reports of family cohesion and/or school connectedness moderate the link between frequency of being bullied and anxiety. Modest, yet significant results indicated that there were group differences for the model, and school connectedness was linked with lower rates of anxiety symptoms and better reports of perceived health for most groups. These findings provided insight into the importance of considering contextual factors such as race when examining bullying victimization as well as provides insight for school and helping professionals such as family therapists striving to stymie the effects of being bullied among adolescents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Systemic Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2692398X.2021.1899738\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Systemic Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2692398X.2021.1899738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Systemic Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2692398X.2021.1899738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要青少年时期的欺凌经历已成为一个全国性的问题,28%的儿童报告在过去一学年受到欺凌。报告被欺负的青少年被发现有更高的焦虑和抑郁率。尽管有几项研究将家庭支持和学校联系作为缓冲被欺凌与心理健康之间联系的保护因素,但人们对欺凌受害的种族/民族差异知之甚少。Bronfenbrenner的生态系统理论认为,儿童的环境(如家庭凝聚力、学校联系)是欺凌经历和心理健康之间的潜在保护因素。来自脆弱家庭和儿童福利研究的青少年数据用于分析一个结构模型,在黑人/非裔美国人、西班牙裔/拉丁裔、白人、多种族和评估中未指定的其他种族的青少年中,直接评估和通过焦虑症状介导的青少年感知健康报告中假设被欺负的频率。此外,我们还研究了家庭凝聚力和/或学校联系的报告是否调节了被欺负频率和焦虑之间的联系。适度但显著的结果表明,该模型存在群体差异,学校联系与大多数群体较低的焦虑症状发生率和更好的感知健康报告有关。这些发现深入了解了在检查欺凌受害情况时考虑种族等背景因素的重要性,也为学校和帮助家庭治疗师等专业人士努力消除青少年受欺凌的影响提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bullying, family cohesion, and school connectedness: a moderated-mediation multigroup analysis of adolescents
ABSTRACT Bullying experiences in adolescence has become a nationwide problem as 28% of the children report being bullied over the past school year. Adolescents who report being bullied have been found to have higher rates of anxiety and depression. Although several studies have examined family support and school connectedness as protective factors that buffer the link between being bullied and mental health, little is known about racial/ethnic differences in bullying victimization. Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory proposes that a child’s environment (e.g., family cohesion, school connectedness) is a potential protective factor between bullying experiences and mental health. Adolescent data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study were used to analyze a structural model, postulating frequency of being bullied on the adolescents reports of perceived health, directly and as mediated by anxiety symptoms, was assessed among adolescents who were Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, White, Multiracial, and other races not specified in the assessment. Additionally, we examined whether reports of family cohesion and/or school connectedness moderate the link between frequency of being bullied and anxiety. Modest, yet significant results indicated that there were group differences for the model, and school connectedness was linked with lower rates of anxiety symptoms and better reports of perceived health for most groups. These findings provided insight into the importance of considering contextual factors such as race when examining bullying victimization as well as provides insight for school and helping professionals such as family therapists striving to stymie the effects of being bullied among adolescents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信