困境与再生:马克思实践观如何克服康德自由困境

Chang He
{"title":"困境与再生:马克思实践观如何克服康德自由困境","authors":"Chang He","doi":"10.4236/ojpp.2021.113025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For \nlaying the foundation for human knowledge, Kant distinguished the ontological \nworld from the phenomenal world. Kant put freedom in the ontological world to \nmake its existence possible, and relied on the moral practice according to the \npure rational. By criticizing God, Kant established reason as a relative absolutist that human beings can trace \nback to. However, in the path of freedom realization, he re-quoted \nGod as a secular arbiter for the need of his system. The deviation of “God \nbeing” in Critique of pure reason and critique of practical reason exposes the \ndifficult problem of Kant’s realization of freedom that perceptual beings \ncannot realize freedom. Marx’s view of freedom experienced two turns and \nfinally came into reality. Based on the realistic, Marx sought the realistic \npath to realize freedom by enriching the connotation of practice, and completed \nthe redemption of Kant’s dilemma.","PeriodicalId":91152,"journal":{"name":"Open journal of philosophy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dilemma and Rebirth: How Marx’s View of Practice Overcomes Kant’s Dilemma of Freedom\",\"authors\":\"Chang He\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/ojpp.2021.113025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For \\nlaying the foundation for human knowledge, Kant distinguished the ontological \\nworld from the phenomenal world. Kant put freedom in the ontological world to \\nmake its existence possible, and relied on the moral practice according to the \\npure rational. By criticizing God, Kant established reason as a relative absolutist that human beings can trace \\nback to. However, in the path of freedom realization, he re-quoted \\nGod as a secular arbiter for the need of his system. The deviation of “God \\nbeing” in Critique of pure reason and critique of practical reason exposes the \\ndifficult problem of Kant’s realization of freedom that perceptual beings \\ncannot realize freedom. Marx’s view of freedom experienced two turns and \\nfinally came into reality. Based on the realistic, Marx sought the realistic \\npath to realize freedom by enriching the connotation of practice, and completed \\nthe redemption of Kant’s dilemma.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open journal of philosophy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open journal of philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2021.113025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open journal of philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2021.113025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

康德区分了本体世界和现象世界,为人类的认识奠定了基础。康德将自由置于本体论世界中,使自由的存在成为可能,并依靠纯粹理性的道德实践。康德通过批判上帝,将理性确立为人类可以追溯到的相对绝对主义。然而,在自由实现的道路上,他重新引用上帝作为世俗仲裁者,以满足其制度的需要。《纯粹理性批判》和《实践理性批判》对“上帝存在”的偏离,暴露了康德实现自由的难题,即感性存在物无法实现自由。马克思的自由观经历了两次转折,最终走向现实。马克思在现实主义的基础上,通过丰富实践的内涵,寻求实现自由的现实路径,完成了对康德困境的救赎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dilemma and Rebirth: How Marx’s View of Practice Overcomes Kant’s Dilemma of Freedom
For laying the foundation for human knowledge, Kant distinguished the ontological world from the phenomenal world. Kant put freedom in the ontological world to make its existence possible, and relied on the moral practice according to the pure rational. By criticizing God, Kant established reason as a relative absolutist that human beings can trace back to. However, in the path of freedom realization, he re-quoted God as a secular arbiter for the need of his system. The deviation of “God being” in Critique of pure reason and critique of practical reason exposes the difficult problem of Kant’s realization of freedom that perceptual beings cannot realize freedom. Marx’s view of freedom experienced two turns and finally came into reality. Based on the realistic, Marx sought the realistic path to realize freedom by enriching the connotation of practice, and completed the redemption of Kant’s dilemma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信