{"title":"民主中的制度忠诚、宗教忠诚和道德操守","authors":"S. Taranto","doi":"10.54103/1971-8543/20343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Institutional loyalty, religious fidelity and moral integrity in a democracy \nABSTRACT: The deontological and contractualist ethical approach in support of democracy has limits because it does not respect personal moral autonomy. This does not allow the single person to be loyal to public institutions, faithful to religion and morally consistent. Therefore, a consequentialist approach to the rules is proposed. \nSOMMARIO: 1. Democrazia e religione - 2. Laicità e libertà - 3. Ragione e morale.","PeriodicalId":30314,"journal":{"name":"Stato Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lealtà istituzionale, fedeltà religiosa e integrità morale in democrazia\",\"authors\":\"S. Taranto\",\"doi\":\"10.54103/1971-8543/20343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Institutional loyalty, religious fidelity and moral integrity in a democracy \\nABSTRACT: The deontological and contractualist ethical approach in support of democracy has limits because it does not respect personal moral autonomy. This does not allow the single person to be loyal to public institutions, faithful to religion and morally consistent. Therefore, a consequentialist approach to the rules is proposed. \\nSOMMARIO: 1. Democrazia e religione - 2. Laicità e libertà - 3. Ragione e morale.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stato Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stato Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54103/1971-8543/20343\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stato Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54103/1971-8543/20343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lealtà istituzionale, fedeltà religiosa e integrità morale in democrazia
Institutional loyalty, religious fidelity and moral integrity in a democracy
ABSTRACT: The deontological and contractualist ethical approach in support of democracy has limits because it does not respect personal moral autonomy. This does not allow the single person to be loyal to public institutions, faithful to religion and morally consistent. Therefore, a consequentialist approach to the rules is proposed.
SOMMARIO: 1. Democrazia e religione - 2. Laicità e libertà - 3. Ragione e morale.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
