牙髓或牙龈干细胞注射治疗牙龈黑三角形的减少:临床和结果研究差距

Jennifer Díaz
{"title":"牙髓或牙龈干细胞注射治疗牙龈黑三角形的减少:临床和结果研究差距","authors":"Jennifer Díaz","doi":"10.23937/2469-570X/1410048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gingival Black Triangles (GBTs), or gingival embrasures, are aesthetically displeasing even when they are not severe enough to require periodontal treatment. Multiple treatment modalities exist, including veneers, composite and other prosthetic modalities, with few, if any, treatments covered by insurance. Demand for GBT treatment is likely to increase with the aging of Baby Boomers, whose use of cosmetic dental procedures exceeds their predecessors. In recent days, stem cell therapy has gained more attention in the regeneration of oral and maxillofacial structures. We propose that the use of Dental Pulp Stem Cells (DPSC) or gingival stem cells for GBT treatment may have clinical, economic, and patient preference advantages that can fill a treatment gap, literally and figuratively. Safety and effectiveness concerns will persist until additional research is funded and conducted but the local nature of treatment would seem to expose patients to fewer risks than systemic use. Targeting the GBTs directly minimizes the long-term self-cleansing problem that other alternatives can create. Longevity is anticipated to exceed veneers and other prosthetic solutions. The cost of stem cell treatment for GBTs will likely be lower than veneers, consistent with the targeted placement. Further, less time in treatment and quicker recovery, both of which are anticipated, are likely to be preferable to patients. We enumerate these potential advantages and suggest a clinical way forward to evaluate the use of stem cell therapy for GBT treatment. Based on the anticipated differences for stem cell treatment of GBTs compared with usual care, we propose approaches for quantifying benefits from the patient perspective and from an economic standpoint. Future research will be needed to confirm the appropriateness of the recommended humanistic and economic evaluations.","PeriodicalId":89694,"journal":{"name":"Journal of stem cell research & therapy","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduction of Gingival Black Triangles with Dental Pulp or Gingival Stem Cell Injection Therapy: Clinical and Outcomes Research Gaps\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Díaz\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2469-570X/1410048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gingival Black Triangles (GBTs), or gingival embrasures, are aesthetically displeasing even when they are not severe enough to require periodontal treatment. Multiple treatment modalities exist, including veneers, composite and other prosthetic modalities, with few, if any, treatments covered by insurance. Demand for GBT treatment is likely to increase with the aging of Baby Boomers, whose use of cosmetic dental procedures exceeds their predecessors. In recent days, stem cell therapy has gained more attention in the regeneration of oral and maxillofacial structures. We propose that the use of Dental Pulp Stem Cells (DPSC) or gingival stem cells for GBT treatment may have clinical, economic, and patient preference advantages that can fill a treatment gap, literally and figuratively. Safety and effectiveness concerns will persist until additional research is funded and conducted but the local nature of treatment would seem to expose patients to fewer risks than systemic use. Targeting the GBTs directly minimizes the long-term self-cleansing problem that other alternatives can create. Longevity is anticipated to exceed veneers and other prosthetic solutions. The cost of stem cell treatment for GBTs will likely be lower than veneers, consistent with the targeted placement. Further, less time in treatment and quicker recovery, both of which are anticipated, are likely to be preferable to patients. We enumerate these potential advantages and suggest a clinical way forward to evaluate the use of stem cell therapy for GBT treatment. Based on the anticipated differences for stem cell treatment of GBTs compared with usual care, we propose approaches for quantifying benefits from the patient perspective and from an economic standpoint. Future research will be needed to confirm the appropriateness of the recommended humanistic and economic evaluations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of stem cell research & therapy\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of stem cell research & therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-570X/1410048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of stem cell research & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-570X/1410048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牙龈黑三角形(GBTs),或牙龈膜,即使不严重到需要牙周治疗,在美学上也会令人不快。存在多种治疗模式,包括贴面、复合材料和其他假体模式,几乎没有保险涵盖的治疗。随着婴儿潮一代的老龄化,对GBT治疗的需求可能会增加,他们对牙科美容手术的使用超过了他们的前辈。近年来,干细胞治疗在口腔颌面部结构再生方面越来越受到重视。我们提出,使用牙髓干细胞(DPSC)或牙龈干细胞治疗GBT可能具有临床、经济和患者偏好的优势,可以从字面和形象上填补治疗空白。安全性和有效性问题将持续存在,直到有更多的研究得到资助和进行,但治疗的局部性质似乎比全身使用使患者面临的风险更小。直接针对GBT将其他替代方案可能造成的长期自我净化问题降至最低。预计寿命将超过贴面和其他假肢解决方案。干细胞治疗GBT的成本可能低于贴面,这与定向放置一致。此外,预计治疗时间更短、恢复更快可能比患者更可取。我们列举了这些潜在的优势,并提出了一种评估干细胞治疗GBT的临床方法。基于干细胞治疗GBT与常规护理相比的预期差异,我们提出了从患者角度和经济角度量化益处的方法。未来需要进行研究,以确认推荐的人文和经济评估的适当性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reduction of Gingival Black Triangles with Dental Pulp or Gingival Stem Cell Injection Therapy: Clinical and Outcomes Research Gaps
Gingival Black Triangles (GBTs), or gingival embrasures, are aesthetically displeasing even when they are not severe enough to require periodontal treatment. Multiple treatment modalities exist, including veneers, composite and other prosthetic modalities, with few, if any, treatments covered by insurance. Demand for GBT treatment is likely to increase with the aging of Baby Boomers, whose use of cosmetic dental procedures exceeds their predecessors. In recent days, stem cell therapy has gained more attention in the regeneration of oral and maxillofacial structures. We propose that the use of Dental Pulp Stem Cells (DPSC) or gingival stem cells for GBT treatment may have clinical, economic, and patient preference advantages that can fill a treatment gap, literally and figuratively. Safety and effectiveness concerns will persist until additional research is funded and conducted but the local nature of treatment would seem to expose patients to fewer risks than systemic use. Targeting the GBTs directly minimizes the long-term self-cleansing problem that other alternatives can create. Longevity is anticipated to exceed veneers and other prosthetic solutions. The cost of stem cell treatment for GBTs will likely be lower than veneers, consistent with the targeted placement. Further, less time in treatment and quicker recovery, both of which are anticipated, are likely to be preferable to patients. We enumerate these potential advantages and suggest a clinical way forward to evaluate the use of stem cell therapy for GBT treatment. Based on the anticipated differences for stem cell treatment of GBTs compared with usual care, we propose approaches for quantifying benefits from the patient perspective and from an economic standpoint. Future research will be needed to confirm the appropriateness of the recommended humanistic and economic evaluations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信