操作变量对农用化学品喷施质量和漂移的影响

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Victor Merani, Matilde Mur, Federico Ramirez, M. J. Ponce, Facundo Guilino, Telmo Palancar
{"title":"操作变量对农用化学品喷施质量和漂移的影响","authors":"Victor Merani, Matilde Mur, Federico Ramirez, M. J. Ponce, Facundo Guilino, Telmo Palancar","doi":"10.31047/1668.298x.v36.n2.19093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pesticide spraying is the most widespread form of pest control. Spraying is a complex process, from the agronomic and environmental point of view. A field trial was carried out, to evaluate the effect of three agrochemical application techniques. In all of them, an air-induced flat fan was used, with different application rates, sprayer speeds and noozle spacing. Three techniques were defined: T1 (57 l ha-1, 18 km h-1 and 0,35 m), T2 (28,7 l ha-1, 18 km h-1 and 0,70 m) and T3 (57 l ha-1, 9 km h-1 and 0,70 m. To assess the techniques, water-sensitive cards were placed on the ground in vertical columns, to measure the quality of application, sedimenting spray drift and cumulative airborne spray drift. The three techniques were similar in application quality but T1 reached a greater coverage. Regarding the airborne drift factor, T2 presented significant differences with respect to the other two techniques, which leads to the conclusion that higher speeds, larger noozle space and lower application rates increase airborne drift. There were no differences in sedimenting drift. Operational variables affect environmental risks regardless of the drop size produced.","PeriodicalId":39278,"journal":{"name":"AgriScientia","volume":"36 1","pages":"45-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efecto de variables operativas sobre la calidad de aplicación y la deriva en la pulverización de agroquímicos\",\"authors\":\"Victor Merani, Matilde Mur, Federico Ramirez, M. J. Ponce, Facundo Guilino, Telmo Palancar\",\"doi\":\"10.31047/1668.298x.v36.n2.19093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pesticide spraying is the most widespread form of pest control. Spraying is a complex process, from the agronomic and environmental point of view. A field trial was carried out, to evaluate the effect of three agrochemical application techniques. In all of them, an air-induced flat fan was used, with different application rates, sprayer speeds and noozle spacing. Three techniques were defined: T1 (57 l ha-1, 18 km h-1 and 0,35 m), T2 (28,7 l ha-1, 18 km h-1 and 0,70 m) and T3 (57 l ha-1, 9 km h-1 and 0,70 m. To assess the techniques, water-sensitive cards were placed on the ground in vertical columns, to measure the quality of application, sedimenting spray drift and cumulative airborne spray drift. The three techniques were similar in application quality but T1 reached a greater coverage. Regarding the airborne drift factor, T2 presented significant differences with respect to the other two techniques, which leads to the conclusion that higher speeds, larger noozle space and lower application rates increase airborne drift. There were no differences in sedimenting drift. Operational variables affect environmental risks regardless of the drop size produced.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AgriScientia\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"45-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AgriScientia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31047/1668.298x.v36.n2.19093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AgriScientia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31047/1668.298x.v36.n2.19093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

喷洒农药是最普遍的害虫防治方式。从农学和环境的角度来看,喷雾是一个复杂的过程。进行了田间试验,评价了三种农药施用技术的效果。在所有这些试验中,都使用了空气诱导平板风扇,具有不同的应用速率、喷雾器速度和喷嘴间距。定义了三种技术:T1(57 l ha-1,18 km h-1和0,35 m)、T2(28,7 l ha-1、18 km h-2和0,70 m)和T3(57 l ha-1,9 km h-1,0,70 m。为了评估技术,在地面上垂直放置了水敏卡,以测量应用质量、沉降喷雾漂移和累积空气喷雾漂移。这三种技术在应用质量上相似,但T1达到了更大的覆盖范围。关于空气漂移因子,T2与其他两种技术存在显著差异,这导致了更高的速度、更大的喷嘴空间和更低的应用率会增加空气漂移的结论。沉降漂移没有差异。操作变量会影响环境风险,而与产生的液滴大小无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efecto de variables operativas sobre la calidad de aplicación y la deriva en la pulverización de agroquímicos
Pesticide spraying is the most widespread form of pest control. Spraying is a complex process, from the agronomic and environmental point of view. A field trial was carried out, to evaluate the effect of three agrochemical application techniques. In all of them, an air-induced flat fan was used, with different application rates, sprayer speeds and noozle spacing. Three techniques were defined: T1 (57 l ha-1, 18 km h-1 and 0,35 m), T2 (28,7 l ha-1, 18 km h-1 and 0,70 m) and T3 (57 l ha-1, 9 km h-1 and 0,70 m. To assess the techniques, water-sensitive cards were placed on the ground in vertical columns, to measure the quality of application, sedimenting spray drift and cumulative airborne spray drift. The three techniques were similar in application quality but T1 reached a greater coverage. Regarding the airborne drift factor, T2 presented significant differences with respect to the other two techniques, which leads to the conclusion that higher speeds, larger noozle space and lower application rates increase airborne drift. There were no differences in sedimenting drift. Operational variables affect environmental risks regardless of the drop size produced.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AgriScientia
AgriScientia Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: AgriScientia es una revista de acceso abierto, de carácter científico-académico, gestionada por el Área de Difusión Científica de la Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. La revista recibe artículos en los idiomas español e inglés. El objetivo de esta publicación es la difusión de los resultados de investigaciones de carácter agronómico. Está destinada a investigadores, estudiantes de pregrado, grado y posgrado, profesionales en el área de las ciencias agropecuarias y público en general interesado en las temáticas relacionadas. Su periodicidad es semestral. Los artículos se reciben durante todo el año. Los tipos de documentos que se publican son artículos científicos, comunicaciones y revisiones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信