旋转木马城市的怀旧和遗产:去工业化、批判性记忆和未来

Q1 Arts and Humanities
M. O′Donovan
{"title":"旋转木马城市的怀旧和遗产:去工业化、批判性记忆和未来","authors":"M. O′Donovan","doi":"10.1080/20518196.2019.1653517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Binghamton became the carousel city as part of a marketing campaign aimed at heritage tourism. The carousels were a gift from George F. Johnson, the Chief Executive Officer of Endicott–Johnson Corporation (EJ) during the twentieth century. They represent a material remnant of a prosperous, idealised past in a deindustrialized landscape. The welfare capitalism of Johnson and EJ dominate the nostalgic, collective memory of Binghamton. Archaeologists and heritage professionals are highly distrustful of the emotion of nostalgia and its sentimental, idealized images of the past. However, nostalgia can lead to critical reflection on the contemporary struggles deindustrialized communities face within capitalism and neoliberal relations. In Binghamton, nostalgia for the security and benefits offered through the Square Deal of George F. Johnson and EJ carries implicit and explicit criticism of contemporary conditions. Archaeologists need to take critical aspects of nostalgia seriously and build on insights from these memories in heritage programming.","PeriodicalId":52158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage","volume":"6 1","pages":"272 - 282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20518196.2019.1653517","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nostalgia and heritage in the carousel city: Deindustrialization, critical memory, and the future\",\"authors\":\"M. O′Donovan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20518196.2019.1653517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Binghamton became the carousel city as part of a marketing campaign aimed at heritage tourism. The carousels were a gift from George F. Johnson, the Chief Executive Officer of Endicott–Johnson Corporation (EJ) during the twentieth century. They represent a material remnant of a prosperous, idealised past in a deindustrialized landscape. The welfare capitalism of Johnson and EJ dominate the nostalgic, collective memory of Binghamton. Archaeologists and heritage professionals are highly distrustful of the emotion of nostalgia and its sentimental, idealized images of the past. However, nostalgia can lead to critical reflection on the contemporary struggles deindustrialized communities face within capitalism and neoliberal relations. In Binghamton, nostalgia for the security and benefits offered through the Square Deal of George F. Johnson and EJ carries implicit and explicit criticism of contemporary conditions. Archaeologists need to take critical aspects of nostalgia seriously and build on insights from these memories in heritage programming.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"272 - 282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20518196.2019.1653517\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20518196.2019.1653517\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20518196.2019.1653517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

宾厄姆顿之所以成为旋转木马城市,是一项旨在发展遗产旅游的营销活动的一部分。旋转木马是乔治·f·约翰逊的礼物,他是20世纪恩迪科特-约翰逊公司(EJ)的首席执行官。它们代表了去工业化景观中繁荣、理想化的过去的物质遗迹。约翰逊和约翰逊的福利资本主义主导着宾厄姆顿怀旧的集体记忆。考古学家和遗产专家对怀旧情绪及其对过去的多愁善感、理想化的形象高度不信任。然而,怀旧可以导致对资本主义和新自由主义关系中去工业化社区面临的当代斗争的批判性反思。在宾厄姆顿,对乔治·f·约翰逊(George F. Johnson)和约翰逊(EJ)的“公平交易”(Square Deal)所带来的安全和福利的怀念,带有对当代状况的含蓄和明确的批评。考古学家需要认真对待怀旧的关键方面,并在遗产规划中从这些记忆中获得洞察力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nostalgia and heritage in the carousel city: Deindustrialization, critical memory, and the future
ABSTRACT Binghamton became the carousel city as part of a marketing campaign aimed at heritage tourism. The carousels were a gift from George F. Johnson, the Chief Executive Officer of Endicott–Johnson Corporation (EJ) during the twentieth century. They represent a material remnant of a prosperous, idealised past in a deindustrialized landscape. The welfare capitalism of Johnson and EJ dominate the nostalgic, collective memory of Binghamton. Archaeologists and heritage professionals are highly distrustful of the emotion of nostalgia and its sentimental, idealized images of the past. However, nostalgia can lead to critical reflection on the contemporary struggles deindustrialized communities face within capitalism and neoliberal relations. In Binghamton, nostalgia for the security and benefits offered through the Square Deal of George F. Johnson and EJ carries implicit and explicit criticism of contemporary conditions. Archaeologists need to take critical aspects of nostalgia seriously and build on insights from these memories in heritage programming.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage
Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage is a new journal intended for participants, volunteers, practitioners, and academics involved in the many projects and practices broadly defined as ‘community archaeology’. This is intended to include the excavation, management, stewardship or presentation of archaeological and heritage resources that include major elements of community participation, collaboration, or outreach. The journal recognises the growing interest in voluntary activism in archaeological research and interpretation, and seeks to create a platform for discussion about the efficacy and importance of such work as well as a showcase for the dissemination of community archaeology projects (which might offer models of best practice for others). By inviting papers relating to theory and practice from across the world, the journal seeks to demonstrate both the diversity of community archaeology and its commonalities in process and associated theory. We seek contributions from members of the voluntary sector as well as those involved in archaeological practice and academia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信