为谁重塑艺术与人类学?乔治·e·马库斯和弗雷德·r·迈尔斯的谈话

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Karin Zitzewitz, M. Ciotti, G. Marcus, F. Myers
{"title":"为谁重塑艺术与人类学?乔治·e·马库斯和弗雷德·r·迈尔斯的谈话","authors":"Karin Zitzewitz, M. Ciotti, G. Marcus, F. Myers","doi":"10.1177/13591835211069611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Karin Zitzewitz: We wanted to begin our conversation by asking about what we call here “the will to collaborate,” both among anthropologists in projects like Traffic in Culture, and among anthropologists and art world professionals. Since Traffic in Culture, George has written about this in terms of para-ethnography, in which anthropologists collaborate with “experts with shared, discovered and negotiated critical sensibilities,” including “those who are deeply complicit with and implicated in powerful institutional processes” (2000: 3,5). We recognize that current strands in the anthropology of art tend to rest upon collaborative processes with artists and, to much less of an extent, with other art-world actors. That stands in contrast with the call for independent ethnographies that you all made in the pages of Traffic.","PeriodicalId":46892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Culture","volume":"27 1","pages":"71 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refiguring Art and Anthropology, For Whom? A conversation with George E. Marcus and Fred R. Myers\",\"authors\":\"Karin Zitzewitz, M. Ciotti, G. Marcus, F. Myers\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13591835211069611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Karin Zitzewitz: We wanted to begin our conversation by asking about what we call here “the will to collaborate,” both among anthropologists in projects like Traffic in Culture, and among anthropologists and art world professionals. Since Traffic in Culture, George has written about this in terms of para-ethnography, in which anthropologists collaborate with “experts with shared, discovered and negotiated critical sensibilities,” including “those who are deeply complicit with and implicated in powerful institutional processes” (2000: 3,5). We recognize that current strands in the anthropology of art tend to rest upon collaborative processes with artists and, to much less of an extent, with other art-world actors. That stands in contrast with the call for independent ethnographies that you all made in the pages of Traffic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Material Culture\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"71 - 87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Material Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591835211069611\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Culture","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591835211069611","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卡琳·齐策维茨:我们想从我们所说的“合作意愿”开始我们的对话,这既发生在像“文化交通”这样的项目中的人类学家之间,也发生在人类学家和艺术界的专业人士之间。自《文化交易》出版以来,乔治以“超民族志”的形式写了这方面的文章,其中人类学家与“具有共享、发现和协商关键敏感性的专家”合作,包括“那些与强大的制度过程深深勾结和牵连的人”(2000:3,5)。我们认识到,目前艺术人类学的分支往往依赖于与艺术家的合作过程,而与艺术界其他参与者的合作程度则要小得多。这与你们在《交通》杂志上呼吁独立的人种学形成了鲜明对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Refiguring Art and Anthropology, For Whom? A conversation with George E. Marcus and Fred R. Myers
Karin Zitzewitz: We wanted to begin our conversation by asking about what we call here “the will to collaborate,” both among anthropologists in projects like Traffic in Culture, and among anthropologists and art world professionals. Since Traffic in Culture, George has written about this in terms of para-ethnography, in which anthropologists collaborate with “experts with shared, discovered and negotiated critical sensibilities,” including “those who are deeply complicit with and implicated in powerful institutional processes” (2000: 3,5). We recognize that current strands in the anthropology of art tend to rest upon collaborative processes with artists and, to much less of an extent, with other art-world actors. That stands in contrast with the call for independent ethnographies that you all made in the pages of Traffic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Material Culture is an interdisciplinary journal designed to cater for the increasing interest in material culture studies. It is concerned with the relationship between artefacts and social relations irrespective of time and place and aims to systematically explore the linkage between the construction of social identities and the production and use of culture. The Journal of Material Culture transcends traditional disciplinary and cultural boundaries drawing on a wide range of disciplines including anthropology, archaeology, design studies, history, human geography, museology and ethnography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信