赞比亚富碳酸盐Munali Ni-Cu-PGE角砾岩矿床的动态侵位揭示

IF 0.9 Q4 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
D. Blanks, D. Holwell, S. Barnes, A. Boyce
{"title":"赞比亚富碳酸盐Munali Ni-Cu-PGE角砾岩矿床的动态侵位揭示","authors":"D. Blanks, D. Holwell, S. Barnes, A. Boyce","doi":"10.1080/25726838.2019.1599203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"among many others. A potentially significant one for the assurance of ethical and responsible mineral sourcing is the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance, currently being rolled out. But the viability and effectiveness of such schemes is often contested and depends on their having demonstrable value to and engagement frommultiple actors across complex interacting supply chains and value chains, including mining companies, manufacturers, investors, retailers, and end-point consumers. Public attention and changes in attitude to corporate ethics and governance can gather pace very rapidly, as demonstrated in recent years in the U.K. by consumer backlashes towards corporations perceived not to be paying a fair amount of tax. It may very quickly become valuable to miners, manufacturers and retailers alike, all concerned to ‘do the right thing’ as well as to anticipate their customers’ ethical concerns, for there to be a credible, transparent and easily comprehensible publicfacing ‘kitemark’ for responsibly sourced minerals and products manufactured using such minerals, akin to the Fairtrade or Forestry Stewardship Council schemes. But defining what such a kitemark should denote and implementing its uptake are likely to be highly challenging. Building on its November 2017 meeting on ‘Mining for the Future’, held in conjunction with the IUGS RFG initiative, the Geological Society convened two workshops in London (May 2018) and Vancouver (June 2018), bringing together actors from across the value chain plus researchers from the U.K. and internationally, to explore how they would assess the value and viability of responsible sourcing schemes; what characteristics would be required for these to be taken up across the chain; and how they can be made transparent and meaningful to end-point consumers. This presentation will report the conclusions of the workshops and will outline a PhD research project now under way to explore these challenges.","PeriodicalId":43298,"journal":{"name":"Applied Earth Science-Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy","volume":"128 1","pages":"39 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/25726838.2019.1599203","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unravelling the dynamic emplacement of the carbonate-rich Munali Ni–Cu–PGE breccia deposit, Zambia\",\"authors\":\"D. Blanks, D. Holwell, S. Barnes, A. Boyce\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25726838.2019.1599203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"among many others. A potentially significant one for the assurance of ethical and responsible mineral sourcing is the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance, currently being rolled out. But the viability and effectiveness of such schemes is often contested and depends on their having demonstrable value to and engagement frommultiple actors across complex interacting supply chains and value chains, including mining companies, manufacturers, investors, retailers, and end-point consumers. Public attention and changes in attitude to corporate ethics and governance can gather pace very rapidly, as demonstrated in recent years in the U.K. by consumer backlashes towards corporations perceived not to be paying a fair amount of tax. It may very quickly become valuable to miners, manufacturers and retailers alike, all concerned to ‘do the right thing’ as well as to anticipate their customers’ ethical concerns, for there to be a credible, transparent and easily comprehensible publicfacing ‘kitemark’ for responsibly sourced minerals and products manufactured using such minerals, akin to the Fairtrade or Forestry Stewardship Council schemes. But defining what such a kitemark should denote and implementing its uptake are likely to be highly challenging. Building on its November 2017 meeting on ‘Mining for the Future’, held in conjunction with the IUGS RFG initiative, the Geological Society convened two workshops in London (May 2018) and Vancouver (June 2018), bringing together actors from across the value chain plus researchers from the U.K. and internationally, to explore how they would assess the value and viability of responsible sourcing schemes; what characteristics would be required for these to be taken up across the chain; and how they can be made transparent and meaningful to end-point consumers. This presentation will report the conclusions of the workshops and will outline a PhD research project now under way to explore these challenges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Earth Science-Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy\",\"volume\":\"128 1\",\"pages\":\"39 - 40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/25726838.2019.1599203\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Earth Science-Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25726838.2019.1599203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Earth Science-Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25726838.2019.1599203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

等等。确保合乎道德和负责任的矿产采购的一个潜在重要举措是目前正在推出的负责任采矿保证倡议。但此类计划的可行性和有效性往往存在争议,取决于它们对复杂互动的供应链和价值链中的多个参与者(包括矿业公司、制造商、投资者、零售商和终端消费者)具有可证明的价值和参与度。公众对企业道德和治理的关注和态度的转变可能会迅速加快,正如近年来英国消费者对被认为没有缴纳合理税款的公司的反弹所表明的那样。它可能很快对矿工、制造商和零售商都很有价值,他们都关心“做正确的事情”以及预测客户的道德问题,因为有一个可信、透明和易于理解的面向公众的“风筝标记”,用于可靠来源的矿物和使用此类矿物制造的产品,类似于公平贸易或林业管理委员会的计划。但是,定义这样一个kitemark应该意味着什么,并实施它的吸收可能是非常具有挑战性的。在2017年11月与IUGS RFG倡议联合举行的“未来采矿”会议的基础上,地质学会在伦敦(2018年5月)和温哥华(2018年6月)举办了两次研讨会,来自价值链的参与者以及来自英国和国际的研究人员聚集在一起,探讨他们将如何评估负责任的采购计划的价值和可行性;需要什么特性才能在整个链条上使用这些特性;以及如何使它们对终端消费者透明和有意义。本报告将报告研讨会的结论,并概述目前正在进行的博士研究项目,以探索这些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unravelling the dynamic emplacement of the carbonate-rich Munali Ni–Cu–PGE breccia deposit, Zambia
among many others. A potentially significant one for the assurance of ethical and responsible mineral sourcing is the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance, currently being rolled out. But the viability and effectiveness of such schemes is often contested and depends on their having demonstrable value to and engagement frommultiple actors across complex interacting supply chains and value chains, including mining companies, manufacturers, investors, retailers, and end-point consumers. Public attention and changes in attitude to corporate ethics and governance can gather pace very rapidly, as demonstrated in recent years in the U.K. by consumer backlashes towards corporations perceived not to be paying a fair amount of tax. It may very quickly become valuable to miners, manufacturers and retailers alike, all concerned to ‘do the right thing’ as well as to anticipate their customers’ ethical concerns, for there to be a credible, transparent and easily comprehensible publicfacing ‘kitemark’ for responsibly sourced minerals and products manufactured using such minerals, akin to the Fairtrade or Forestry Stewardship Council schemes. But defining what such a kitemark should denote and implementing its uptake are likely to be highly challenging. Building on its November 2017 meeting on ‘Mining for the Future’, held in conjunction with the IUGS RFG initiative, the Geological Society convened two workshops in London (May 2018) and Vancouver (June 2018), bringing together actors from across the value chain plus researchers from the U.K. and internationally, to explore how they would assess the value and viability of responsible sourcing schemes; what characteristics would be required for these to be taken up across the chain; and how they can be made transparent and meaningful to end-point consumers. This presentation will report the conclusions of the workshops and will outline a PhD research project now under way to explore these challenges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信