《杜兰斯的风景:电子游戏中的乌托邦主义和东欧

IF 0.3 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE, SLAVIC
Daniil Leiderman
{"title":"《杜兰斯的风景:电子游戏中的乌托邦主义和东欧","authors":"Daniil Leiderman","doi":"10.1016/j.ruslit.2022.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper considers the video games <em>S.T.A.L.K.E.R: Shadows of Chernobyl</em> (2007), <em>Metro 2033</em> (2010), <em>Papers, Please</em> (2013), <em>This War of Mine</em> (2014) and <em>Workers &amp; Resources: Soviet Republic</em> (2021), which all explore the recurring chronotope of Eastern Europe as an experimental space designed for testing the player's ethical agency. I argue that there is a thread linking formal ludic iteration, and the returns of modernist utopian discourses as post-apocalyptic within these games. This thread weaves ethical and unethical choices into a simulacral ludic history, trapping the player within a virtual embodiment of their own utopian desire, to provoke them to escape it, or seek alternatives to it. All these games allegorize Eastern Europe as a site of both normalized oppression and of sovereign choice, holding the player responsible for both options. They imagine and stereotype Eastern Europe as a durance: an entrapping space of looming ideological oppression that can be territorialized only through being survived. This paper interrogates the critical potential of video games by considering what may be the medium's most oppressive aspect ‒ its immense facility at ideological training disguised as sovereign freedom of choice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43192,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Landscape of Durance: Utopianism and Eastern Europe in Video Games\",\"authors\":\"Daniil Leiderman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ruslit.2022.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper considers the video games <em>S.T.A.L.K.E.R: Shadows of Chernobyl</em> (2007), <em>Metro 2033</em> (2010), <em>Papers, Please</em> (2013), <em>This War of Mine</em> (2014) and <em>Workers &amp; Resources: Soviet Republic</em> (2021), which all explore the recurring chronotope of Eastern Europe as an experimental space designed for testing the player's ethical agency. I argue that there is a thread linking formal ludic iteration, and the returns of modernist utopian discourses as post-apocalyptic within these games. This thread weaves ethical and unethical choices into a simulacral ludic history, trapping the player within a virtual embodiment of their own utopian desire, to provoke them to escape it, or seek alternatives to it. All these games allegorize Eastern Europe as a site of both normalized oppression and of sovereign choice, holding the player responsible for both options. They imagine and stereotype Eastern Europe as a durance: an entrapping space of looming ideological oppression that can be territorialized only through being survived. This paper interrogates the critical potential of video games by considering what may be the medium's most oppressive aspect ‒ its immense facility at ideological training disguised as sovereign freedom of choice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RUSSIAN LITERATURE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RUSSIAN LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304347922000205\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, SLAVIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304347922000205","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以电子游戏《S.T.A.L.K.E.R: Shadows of Chernobyl》(2007)、《Metro 2033》(2010)、《Papers, Please》(2013)、《This War of Mine》(2014)和《Workers &资源:《苏维埃共和国》(2021年),它们都探索了东欧反复出现的时间点,作为测试玩家道德代理的实验空间。我认为在这些游戏中存在着一条将正式的滑稽迭代与后现代乌托邦话语的回归联系在一起的线索。这条线索将道德和不道德的选择编织到一个模拟的滑稽历史中,将玩家困在他们自己乌托邦愿望的虚拟化身中,刺激他们逃离它,或寻找替代方案。所有这些游戏都将东欧寓言化为一个既有正常压迫又有自主选择的地方,让玩家对这两种选择负责。他们把东欧想象成一个坚忍的国度:一个意识形态压迫若隐若现的陷阱空间,只有通过生存才能被领土化。本文通过思考电子游戏最具压迫性的一面——它在意识形态训练方面的巨大便利伪装成自主选择的自由,来探究电子游戏的关键潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Landscape of Durance: Utopianism and Eastern Europe in Video Games

This paper considers the video games S.T.A.L.K.E.R: Shadows of Chernobyl (2007), Metro 2033 (2010), Papers, Please (2013), This War of Mine (2014) and Workers & Resources: Soviet Republic (2021), which all explore the recurring chronotope of Eastern Europe as an experimental space designed for testing the player's ethical agency. I argue that there is a thread linking formal ludic iteration, and the returns of modernist utopian discourses as post-apocalyptic within these games. This thread weaves ethical and unethical choices into a simulacral ludic history, trapping the player within a virtual embodiment of their own utopian desire, to provoke them to escape it, or seek alternatives to it. All these games allegorize Eastern Europe as a site of both normalized oppression and of sovereign choice, holding the player responsible for both options. They imagine and stereotype Eastern Europe as a durance: an entrapping space of looming ideological oppression that can be territorialized only through being survived. This paper interrogates the critical potential of video games by considering what may be the medium's most oppressive aspect ‒ its immense facility at ideological training disguised as sovereign freedom of choice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
RUSSIAN LITERATURE
RUSSIAN LITERATURE LITERATURE, SLAVIC-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Russian Literature combines issues devoted to special topics of Russian literature with contributions on related subjects in Croatian, Serbian, Czech, Slovak and Polish literatures. Moreover, several issues each year contain articles on heterogeneous subjects concerning Russian Literature. All methods and viewpoints are welcomed, provided they contribute something new, original or challenging to our understanding of Russian and other Slavic literatures. Russian Literature regularly publishes special issues devoted to: • the historical avant-garde in Russian literature and in the other Slavic literatures • the development of descriptive and theoretical poetics in Russian studies and in studies of other Slavic fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信