5.5mm颞硬角膜手动小切口白内障手术与5.5mm颞透明角膜大切口超声乳化术与5.25mm硬质pmma人工晶状体袋植入术的比较研究

{"title":"5.5mm颞硬角膜手动小切口白内障手术与5.5mm颞透明角膜大切口超声乳化术与5.25mm硬质pmma人工晶状体袋植入术的比较研究","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jocr.03.02.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Aim of the study is to Compare the astigmatism induced by a reduced temporal sclerocorneal tunnel incision\nmanual small incision cataract surgery with an extended temporal clear corneal Phacoemulsification of similar width .\nMethods: A Prospective, randomised controlled study was carried out in 224 selected patients who were again divided\ninto two groups - Group A (112 patients) and Group B (112 patients). Group A patients underwent temporal manual\nsmall incision cataract surgery with a 5.5 mm sclerocorneal incision and Group B underwent phacoemulsification by\na 2.8 mm clear corneal temporal incision which was extended to 5.5 mm before IOL implantation. In both groups, a\n5.25 mm rigid PMMA IOL was implanted in the bag. UCVA and BCVA of both group of patients was quantified and\nanalyzed at 1 week and at 6 weeks\nObservation: It was seen that the mean surgically Induced astigmatism in group A (N=112) was 0.5625D , which was\nslightly lesser than that in Group B (N=112) which was 0.65D, although the p-value of 0.26 indicated that there was\nstatistically no significant difference in visual outcomes between the two groups of patients. Here, a p-value of < 0.05\nwas considered statistically significant.\nConclusion: In Skilled and Safe hands, refractive outcomes following performing a 5.5mm temporal sclerocorneal\nfrown-incision manual small incision cataract surgery and a phacoemulsification procedure by a 2.8mm temporal clear\ncorneal incision extended to 5.5mm for implanting a 5.25mm rigid PMMA IOL , are comparable.","PeriodicalId":91268,"journal":{"name":"HSOA journal of ophthalmology & clinical research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of 5.5mm Temporal Sclerocorneal Manual Small Incision\\nCataract Surgery Versus 5.5mm Temporal Clear Corneal Extended-incision\\nPhacoemulsification with Implantation of a 5.25mm Rigid pmma Intraocular lens\\nin the Bag\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/jocr.03.02.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Aim of the study is to Compare the astigmatism induced by a reduced temporal sclerocorneal tunnel incision\\nmanual small incision cataract surgery with an extended temporal clear corneal Phacoemulsification of similar width .\\nMethods: A Prospective, randomised controlled study was carried out in 224 selected patients who were again divided\\ninto two groups - Group A (112 patients) and Group B (112 patients). Group A patients underwent temporal manual\\nsmall incision cataract surgery with a 5.5 mm sclerocorneal incision and Group B underwent phacoemulsification by\\na 2.8 mm clear corneal temporal incision which was extended to 5.5 mm before IOL implantation. In both groups, a\\n5.25 mm rigid PMMA IOL was implanted in the bag. UCVA and BCVA of both group of patients was quantified and\\nanalyzed at 1 week and at 6 weeks\\nObservation: It was seen that the mean surgically Induced astigmatism in group A (N=112) was 0.5625D , which was\\nslightly lesser than that in Group B (N=112) which was 0.65D, although the p-value of 0.26 indicated that there was\\nstatistically no significant difference in visual outcomes between the two groups of patients. Here, a p-value of < 0.05\\nwas considered statistically significant.\\nConclusion: In Skilled and Safe hands, refractive outcomes following performing a 5.5mm temporal sclerocorneal\\nfrown-incision manual small incision cataract surgery and a phacoemulsification procedure by a 2.8mm temporal clear\\ncorneal incision extended to 5.5mm for implanting a 5.25mm rigid PMMA IOL , are comparable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HSOA journal of ophthalmology & clinical research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HSOA journal of ophthalmology & clinical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/jocr.03.02.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HSOA journal of ophthalmology & clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jocr.03.02.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较人工小切口颞部巩膜隧道缩窄切口白内障手术与相似宽度颞部透明角膜超声乳化术对散光的影响。方法:选取224例患者进行前瞻性、随机对照研究,再次分为a组(112例)和B组(112例)。A组患者行颞部手动小切口白内障手术,角膜硬切口为5.5 mm; B组患者行2.8 mm透明角膜颞部切口,扩大至5.5 mm,行超声乳化术,行人工晶状体植入术。两组均植入5.25 mm硬质PMMA人工晶状体。对两组患者在1周和6周时的UCVA和BCVA进行量化分析。观察:A组(N=112)的平均手术性散光为0.5625D,略小于B组(N=112)的0.65D,但p值为0.26表明两组患者的视力结果无统计学差异。在这里,p值< 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结论:在熟练和安全的操作者中,采用5.5mm颞部硬角膜-皱襞切口手动小切口白内障手术和采用2.8mm颞部透明角膜切口扩大到5.5mm并植入5.25mm刚性PMMA IOL的超声乳化手术的屈光结果是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of 5.5mm Temporal Sclerocorneal Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery Versus 5.5mm Temporal Clear Corneal Extended-incision Phacoemulsification with Implantation of a 5.25mm Rigid pmma Intraocular lens in the Bag
Objective: Aim of the study is to Compare the astigmatism induced by a reduced temporal sclerocorneal tunnel incision manual small incision cataract surgery with an extended temporal clear corneal Phacoemulsification of similar width . Methods: A Prospective, randomised controlled study was carried out in 224 selected patients who were again divided into two groups - Group A (112 patients) and Group B (112 patients). Group A patients underwent temporal manual small incision cataract surgery with a 5.5 mm sclerocorneal incision and Group B underwent phacoemulsification by a 2.8 mm clear corneal temporal incision which was extended to 5.5 mm before IOL implantation. In both groups, a 5.25 mm rigid PMMA IOL was implanted in the bag. UCVA and BCVA of both group of patients was quantified and analyzed at 1 week and at 6 weeks Observation: It was seen that the mean surgically Induced astigmatism in group A (N=112) was 0.5625D , which was slightly lesser than that in Group B (N=112) which was 0.65D, although the p-value of 0.26 indicated that there was statistically no significant difference in visual outcomes between the two groups of patients. Here, a p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Conclusion: In Skilled and Safe hands, refractive outcomes following performing a 5.5mm temporal sclerocorneal frown-incision manual small incision cataract surgery and a phacoemulsification procedure by a 2.8mm temporal clear corneal incision extended to 5.5mm for implanting a 5.25mm rigid PMMA IOL , are comparable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信