{"title":"5.5mm颞硬角膜手动小切口白内障手术与5.5mm颞透明角膜大切口超声乳化术与5.25mm硬质pmma人工晶状体袋植入术的比较研究","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jocr.03.02.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Aim of the study is to Compare the astigmatism induced by a reduced temporal sclerocorneal tunnel incision\nmanual small incision cataract surgery with an extended temporal clear corneal Phacoemulsification of similar width .\nMethods: A Prospective, randomised controlled study was carried out in 224 selected patients who were again divided\ninto two groups - Group A (112 patients) and Group B (112 patients). Group A patients underwent temporal manual\nsmall incision cataract surgery with a 5.5 mm sclerocorneal incision and Group B underwent phacoemulsification by\na 2.8 mm clear corneal temporal incision which was extended to 5.5 mm before IOL implantation. In both groups, a\n5.25 mm rigid PMMA IOL was implanted in the bag. UCVA and BCVA of both group of patients was quantified and\nanalyzed at 1 week and at 6 weeks\nObservation: It was seen that the mean surgically Induced astigmatism in group A (N=112) was 0.5625D , which was\nslightly lesser than that in Group B (N=112) which was 0.65D, although the p-value of 0.26 indicated that there was\nstatistically no significant difference in visual outcomes between the two groups of patients. Here, a p-value of < 0.05\nwas considered statistically significant.\nConclusion: In Skilled and Safe hands, refractive outcomes following performing a 5.5mm temporal sclerocorneal\nfrown-incision manual small incision cataract surgery and a phacoemulsification procedure by a 2.8mm temporal clear\ncorneal incision extended to 5.5mm for implanting a 5.25mm rigid PMMA IOL , are comparable.","PeriodicalId":91268,"journal":{"name":"HSOA journal of ophthalmology & clinical research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of 5.5mm Temporal Sclerocorneal Manual Small Incision\\nCataract Surgery Versus 5.5mm Temporal Clear Corneal Extended-incision\\nPhacoemulsification with Implantation of a 5.25mm Rigid pmma Intraocular lens\\nin the Bag\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/jocr.03.02.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Aim of the study is to Compare the astigmatism induced by a reduced temporal sclerocorneal tunnel incision\\nmanual small incision cataract surgery with an extended temporal clear corneal Phacoemulsification of similar width .\\nMethods: A Prospective, randomised controlled study was carried out in 224 selected patients who were again divided\\ninto two groups - Group A (112 patients) and Group B (112 patients). Group A patients underwent temporal manual\\nsmall incision cataract surgery with a 5.5 mm sclerocorneal incision and Group B underwent phacoemulsification by\\na 2.8 mm clear corneal temporal incision which was extended to 5.5 mm before IOL implantation. In both groups, a\\n5.25 mm rigid PMMA IOL was implanted in the bag. UCVA and BCVA of both group of patients was quantified and\\nanalyzed at 1 week and at 6 weeks\\nObservation: It was seen that the mean surgically Induced astigmatism in group A (N=112) was 0.5625D , which was\\nslightly lesser than that in Group B (N=112) which was 0.65D, although the p-value of 0.26 indicated that there was\\nstatistically no significant difference in visual outcomes between the two groups of patients. Here, a p-value of < 0.05\\nwas considered statistically significant.\\nConclusion: In Skilled and Safe hands, refractive outcomes following performing a 5.5mm temporal sclerocorneal\\nfrown-incision manual small incision cataract surgery and a phacoemulsification procedure by a 2.8mm temporal clear\\ncorneal incision extended to 5.5mm for implanting a 5.25mm rigid PMMA IOL , are comparable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HSOA journal of ophthalmology & clinical research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HSOA journal of ophthalmology & clinical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/jocr.03.02.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HSOA journal of ophthalmology & clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jocr.03.02.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comparative Study of 5.5mm Temporal Sclerocorneal Manual Small Incision
Cataract Surgery Versus 5.5mm Temporal Clear Corneal Extended-incision
Phacoemulsification with Implantation of a 5.25mm Rigid pmma Intraocular lens
in the Bag
Objective: Aim of the study is to Compare the astigmatism induced by a reduced temporal sclerocorneal tunnel incision
manual small incision cataract surgery with an extended temporal clear corneal Phacoemulsification of similar width .
Methods: A Prospective, randomised controlled study was carried out in 224 selected patients who were again divided
into two groups - Group A (112 patients) and Group B (112 patients). Group A patients underwent temporal manual
small incision cataract surgery with a 5.5 mm sclerocorneal incision and Group B underwent phacoemulsification by
a 2.8 mm clear corneal temporal incision which was extended to 5.5 mm before IOL implantation. In both groups, a
5.25 mm rigid PMMA IOL was implanted in the bag. UCVA and BCVA of both group of patients was quantified and
analyzed at 1 week and at 6 weeks
Observation: It was seen that the mean surgically Induced astigmatism in group A (N=112) was 0.5625D , which was
slightly lesser than that in Group B (N=112) which was 0.65D, although the p-value of 0.26 indicated that there was
statistically no significant difference in visual outcomes between the two groups of patients. Here, a p-value of < 0.05
was considered statistically significant.
Conclusion: In Skilled and Safe hands, refractive outcomes following performing a 5.5mm temporal sclerocorneal
frown-incision manual small incision cataract surgery and a phacoemulsification procedure by a 2.8mm temporal clear
corneal incision extended to 5.5mm for implanting a 5.25mm rigid PMMA IOL , are comparable.