战略弹性:在大流行后的世界中,明智地对待慈善战略

IF 0.7 Q3 SOCIAL ISSUES
Jewlya Lynn, Clare Nolan, P. Waring
{"title":"战略弹性:在大流行后的世界中,明智地对待慈善战略","authors":"Jewlya Lynn, Clare Nolan, P. Waring","doi":"10.9707/1944-5660.1564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public and private systems worldwide have been disrupted by COVID-19, cutting across all types of philanthropic priorities. Amid this uncertainty, some philanthropic strategies have struggled to find their footing while others have adapted easily, harnessing previously unanticipated opportunities to achieve change. Why have some philanthropic strategies been more successful than others? What wisdom can we draw from this moment that can help us prepare for the future? • During times of crisis, the concept of resilience is frequently applied to nonprofit organizations and their leaders. This article flips the vantage point toward funders, proposing a theory to explain what makes some philanthropic strategies more durable than others in the face of disruptions. Drawing on case examples across diverse settings, literature on resilience, and the authors' own observations, it proposes five elements of resilient philanthropic strategies: They release control over pathways and outcomes;support networks rather than solutions;address systems, not symptoms;focus on transformative over transactional capacity;and align philanthropic power to supplement, not supplant. • Recognizing that COVID-19 is only one of many disruptions our world is likely to face, this article seeks to offer a new way of thinking about strategy resilience that centers people and organizations instead of the power of financial resources. At the core of this theory is the assumption that given today's complexities, philanthropy must use its power differently — releasing control over organizations and their change strategies while using its unique position, reach, and voice to work in solidarity with community leaders. © 2021. All Rights Reserved.","PeriodicalId":42766,"journal":{"name":"Foundation Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategy Resilience: Getting Wise About Philanthropic Strategy in a Post-Pandemic World\",\"authors\":\"Jewlya Lynn, Clare Nolan, P. Waring\",\"doi\":\"10.9707/1944-5660.1564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Public and private systems worldwide have been disrupted by COVID-19, cutting across all types of philanthropic priorities. Amid this uncertainty, some philanthropic strategies have struggled to find their footing while others have adapted easily, harnessing previously unanticipated opportunities to achieve change. Why have some philanthropic strategies been more successful than others? What wisdom can we draw from this moment that can help us prepare for the future? • During times of crisis, the concept of resilience is frequently applied to nonprofit organizations and their leaders. This article flips the vantage point toward funders, proposing a theory to explain what makes some philanthropic strategies more durable than others in the face of disruptions. Drawing on case examples across diverse settings, literature on resilience, and the authors' own observations, it proposes five elements of resilient philanthropic strategies: They release control over pathways and outcomes;support networks rather than solutions;address systems, not symptoms;focus on transformative over transactional capacity;and align philanthropic power to supplement, not supplant. • Recognizing that COVID-19 is only one of many disruptions our world is likely to face, this article seeks to offer a new way of thinking about strategy resilience that centers people and organizations instead of the power of financial resources. At the core of this theory is the assumption that given today's complexities, philanthropy must use its power differently — releasing control over organizations and their change strategies while using its unique position, reach, and voice to work in solidarity with community leaders. © 2021. All Rights Reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foundation Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foundation Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9707/1944-5660.1564\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundation Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9707/1944-5660.1564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

新冠肺炎扰乱了世界各地的公共和私人系统,切断了所有类型的慈善优先事项。在这种不确定性中,一些慈善战略很难找到立足点,而另一些则很容易适应,利用以前意想不到的机会实现变革。为什么有些慈善策略比其他策略更成功?我们能从这一刻汲取什么智慧,帮助我们为未来做好准备?•在危机时期,韧性的概念经常应用于非营利组织及其领导人。这篇文章将有利地位转向了资助者,提出了一个理论来解释是什么让一些慈善策略在面对干扰时比其他策略更持久。根据不同环境下的案例、关于韧性的文献以及作者自己的观察,它提出了韧性慈善战略的五个要素:它们释放对途径和结果的控制;支持网络而非解决方案;解决系统问题,而不是症状;注重变革而非交易能力;并将慈善力量调整为补充,而不是取代。•认识到新冠肺炎只是我们的世界可能面临的众多破坏之一,本文试图提供一种新的战略韧性思考方式,以人和组织为中心,而不是以财政资源的力量为中心。这一理论的核心是假设,鉴于当今的复杂性,慈善事业必须以不同的方式使用其权力——释放对组织及其变革战略的控制,同时利用其独特的地位、影响力和声音与社区领袖团结一致。©2021。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategy Resilience: Getting Wise About Philanthropic Strategy in a Post-Pandemic World
Public and private systems worldwide have been disrupted by COVID-19, cutting across all types of philanthropic priorities. Amid this uncertainty, some philanthropic strategies have struggled to find their footing while others have adapted easily, harnessing previously unanticipated opportunities to achieve change. Why have some philanthropic strategies been more successful than others? What wisdom can we draw from this moment that can help us prepare for the future? • During times of crisis, the concept of resilience is frequently applied to nonprofit organizations and their leaders. This article flips the vantage point toward funders, proposing a theory to explain what makes some philanthropic strategies more durable than others in the face of disruptions. Drawing on case examples across diverse settings, literature on resilience, and the authors' own observations, it proposes five elements of resilient philanthropic strategies: They release control over pathways and outcomes;support networks rather than solutions;address systems, not symptoms;focus on transformative over transactional capacity;and align philanthropic power to supplement, not supplant. • Recognizing that COVID-19 is only one of many disruptions our world is likely to face, this article seeks to offer a new way of thinking about strategy resilience that centers people and organizations instead of the power of financial resources. At the core of this theory is the assumption that given today's complexities, philanthropy must use its power differently — releasing control over organizations and their change strategies while using its unique position, reach, and voice to work in solidarity with community leaders. © 2021. All Rights Reserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foundation Review
Foundation Review SOCIAL ISSUES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The Foundation Review is the first peer-reviewed journal of philanthropy, written by and for foundation staff and boards and those who work with them. Each quarterly issue provides peer-reviewed reports about the field of philanthropy, including reports by foundations on their own work. The Foundation Review is a hybrid journal, with a mix of subscriber-only and open-access content. Sponsored issues may be completely open access. Authors may pay to have articles made open access. All articles become open access two years after publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信