业务合作伙伴专业化和公司信息披露透明度

Hua Lee , Hsien-Li Lee , Chen-Chin Wang
{"title":"业务合作伙伴专业化和公司信息披露透明度","authors":"Hua Lee ,&nbsp;Hsien-Li Lee ,&nbsp;Chen-Chin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.intacc.2017.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper explores the association of audit partners' industry specialization with corporate disclosure transparency and the latter's informativeness. The distinctive institutional designs of partner signature requirement and Information Disclosure and Transparency Ranking System (<em>IDTRS</em>) adopted in Taiwan allow us to empirically address the issue. We posit and find that the rankings from the <em>IDTRS</em> are higher for firms audited by industry specialist engagement partners than for firms audited by non-specialist engagement partners. Additionally, the results show that the probability of informed trade (<em>PIN</em>) proxy for information asymmetry is negatively associated with the rankings for clients of industry specialist engagement partners, but not for clients of industry non-specialist engagement partners. The results are robust with respect to alternative estimation method and alternative measures of industry specialization. Overall, the evidence suggests that industry specialist engagement partners enhance the credibility of corporate disclosure transparency, through which information asymmetry is further declined. The evidence provides policy implications to the partner signature requirement adopted in Taiwan and China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101232,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Accounting","volume":"52 4","pages":"Pages 354-369"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.intacc.2017.10.001","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engagement partner specialization and corporate disclosure transparency\",\"authors\":\"Hua Lee ,&nbsp;Hsien-Li Lee ,&nbsp;Chen-Chin Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.intacc.2017.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper explores the association of audit partners' industry specialization with corporate disclosure transparency and the latter's informativeness. The distinctive institutional designs of partner signature requirement and Information Disclosure and Transparency Ranking System (<em>IDTRS</em>) adopted in Taiwan allow us to empirically address the issue. We posit and find that the rankings from the <em>IDTRS</em> are higher for firms audited by industry specialist engagement partners than for firms audited by non-specialist engagement partners. Additionally, the results show that the probability of informed trade (<em>PIN</em>) proxy for information asymmetry is negatively associated with the rankings for clients of industry specialist engagement partners, but not for clients of industry non-specialist engagement partners. The results are robust with respect to alternative estimation method and alternative measures of industry specialization. Overall, the evidence suggests that industry specialist engagement partners enhance the credibility of corporate disclosure transparency, through which information asymmetry is further declined. The evidence provides policy implications to the partner signature requirement adopted in Taiwan and China.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Accounting\",\"volume\":\"52 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 354-369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.intacc.2017.10.001\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020706316300991\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020706316300991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本文探讨了审计合伙人的行业专业化与公司信息披露透明度及其信息量的关系。台湾独特的合作伙伴签名制度设计和资讯披露与透明度排名制度(IDTRS),让我们可以从经验上解决这个问题。我们假设并发现,由行业专家审计合伙人审计的公司在IDTRS中的排名高于由非专业审计合伙人审计的公司。此外,结果表明,信息不对称的知情交易(PIN)代理概率与行业专业业务合作伙伴客户的排名呈负相关,但与行业非专业业务合作伙伴客户的排名无关。对于行业专业化的替代估计方法和替代度量,结果是稳健的。总体而言,证据表明行业专家参与伙伴提高了企业信息披露透明度的可信度,从而进一步降低了信息不对称。研究结果对台湾和中国采用的合作伙伴签名要求提供了政策启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engagement partner specialization and corporate disclosure transparency

This paper explores the association of audit partners' industry specialization with corporate disclosure transparency and the latter's informativeness. The distinctive institutional designs of partner signature requirement and Information Disclosure and Transparency Ranking System (IDTRS) adopted in Taiwan allow us to empirically address the issue. We posit and find that the rankings from the IDTRS are higher for firms audited by industry specialist engagement partners than for firms audited by non-specialist engagement partners. Additionally, the results show that the probability of informed trade (PIN) proxy for information asymmetry is negatively associated with the rankings for clients of industry specialist engagement partners, but not for clients of industry non-specialist engagement partners. The results are robust with respect to alternative estimation method and alternative measures of industry specialization. Overall, the evidence suggests that industry specialist engagement partners enhance the credibility of corporate disclosure transparency, through which information asymmetry is further declined. The evidence provides policy implications to the partner signature requirement adopted in Taiwan and China.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信