侵蚀环境下地质聚合物砂浆保护涂层的评价

IF 1.9 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
K. Rathinam, V. Kanagarajan, S. Banu
{"title":"侵蚀环境下地质聚合物砂浆保护涂层的评价","authors":"K. Rathinam, V. Kanagarajan, S. Banu","doi":"10.12989/AMR.2020.9.3.219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to investigate the durability of fly ash based geopolymer mortar with and without protective coatings in aggressive chemical environments. The source materials for geopolymer are Fly ash and Ground Granulated Blast furnace Slag (GGBS) and they are considered in the combination of 80% & 20% respectively. Two Molarities of NaOH solution were considered such as 8M and 10M. The ratio of binder to sand and Sodium silicate to Sodium hydroxide solution (Na2SiO3/NaOH) are taken as 1:2 and 2 respectively. The alkaline liquid to binder ratio is 0.4. Compressive strength tests were conducted at various ages of the mortar specimens. In order to evaluate the performance of coatings on geopolymer mortar under aggressive chemical environment, the mortar specimens were coated with two different types of coatings such as epoxy and Acrylic. They were then subjected to different chemical environments by immersing them in 10% standard solutions of each ammonium nitrate, sodium chloride and sulphuric acid. Drop in compressive strength as a result of chemical exposure was considered as a measure of chemical attack and the drop in compressive strength was measured after 30 and 60 days of chemical exposure. The compressive strength results following chemical exposure indicated that the specimens containing the acrylic coating proved to be more resistant to chemical attacks. The control specimen without coating showed a much greater degree of deterioration. Therefore, the application of acrylic coating was invariably much more effective in improving the compressive strength as well as the resistance of mortar against chemical attacks. The results also indicated that among all the aggressive attacks, the sulphate environment has the most adverse effect in terms of lowering the strength.","PeriodicalId":46242,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Materials Research-An International Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"219-231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of protective coatings for geopolymer mortar under aggressive environment\",\"authors\":\"K. Rathinam, V. Kanagarajan, S. Banu\",\"doi\":\"10.12989/AMR.2020.9.3.219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study is to investigate the durability of fly ash based geopolymer mortar with and without protective coatings in aggressive chemical environments. The source materials for geopolymer are Fly ash and Ground Granulated Blast furnace Slag (GGBS) and they are considered in the combination of 80% & 20% respectively. Two Molarities of NaOH solution were considered such as 8M and 10M. The ratio of binder to sand and Sodium silicate to Sodium hydroxide solution (Na2SiO3/NaOH) are taken as 1:2 and 2 respectively. The alkaline liquid to binder ratio is 0.4. Compressive strength tests were conducted at various ages of the mortar specimens. In order to evaluate the performance of coatings on geopolymer mortar under aggressive chemical environment, the mortar specimens were coated with two different types of coatings such as epoxy and Acrylic. They were then subjected to different chemical environments by immersing them in 10% standard solutions of each ammonium nitrate, sodium chloride and sulphuric acid. Drop in compressive strength as a result of chemical exposure was considered as a measure of chemical attack and the drop in compressive strength was measured after 30 and 60 days of chemical exposure. The compressive strength results following chemical exposure indicated that the specimens containing the acrylic coating proved to be more resistant to chemical attacks. The control specimen without coating showed a much greater degree of deterioration. Therefore, the application of acrylic coating was invariably much more effective in improving the compressive strength as well as the resistance of mortar against chemical attacks. The results also indicated that among all the aggressive attacks, the sulphate environment has the most adverse effect in terms of lowering the strength.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Materials Research-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"219-231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Materials Research-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12989/AMR.2020.9.3.219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Materials Research-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12989/AMR.2020.9.3.219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究的目的是研究粉煤灰基地聚合物砂浆在腐蚀性化学环境中具有和不具有保护涂层的耐久性。地聚合物的原料为粉煤灰和矿渣(GGBS),分别考虑80%和20%的组合。NaOH溶液的浓度分别为8M和10M。粘结剂与砂、水玻璃与氢氧化钠溶液(Na2SiO3/NaOH)的比例分别为1:2和2。碱性液胶比为0.4。对不同龄期砂浆试件进行了抗压强度试验。为了评价地聚合物砂浆在腐蚀性化学环境下涂层的性能,对砂浆试样进行了环氧树脂和丙烯酸两种不同类型涂层的涂敷。然后将它们浸泡在硝酸铵、氯化钠和硫酸的10%标准溶液中,置于不同的化学环境中。由于化学物质暴露导致的抗压强度下降被认为是化学侵蚀的一种衡量标准,抗压强度的下降是在化学物质暴露30天和60天后测量的。化学暴露后的抗压强度结果表明,含有丙烯酸涂层的样品被证明更耐化学侵蚀。未涂覆的对照试样表现出更大程度的劣化。因此,丙烯酸涂料的应用在提高砂浆的抗压强度和抗化学侵蚀能力方面总是更有效。结果还表明,在所有侵略性攻击中,硫酸盐环境对强度的降低影响最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of protective coatings for geopolymer mortar under aggressive environment
The aim of this study is to investigate the durability of fly ash based geopolymer mortar with and without protective coatings in aggressive chemical environments. The source materials for geopolymer are Fly ash and Ground Granulated Blast furnace Slag (GGBS) and they are considered in the combination of 80% & 20% respectively. Two Molarities of NaOH solution were considered such as 8M and 10M. The ratio of binder to sand and Sodium silicate to Sodium hydroxide solution (Na2SiO3/NaOH) are taken as 1:2 and 2 respectively. The alkaline liquid to binder ratio is 0.4. Compressive strength tests were conducted at various ages of the mortar specimens. In order to evaluate the performance of coatings on geopolymer mortar under aggressive chemical environment, the mortar specimens were coated with two different types of coatings such as epoxy and Acrylic. They were then subjected to different chemical environments by immersing them in 10% standard solutions of each ammonium nitrate, sodium chloride and sulphuric acid. Drop in compressive strength as a result of chemical exposure was considered as a measure of chemical attack and the drop in compressive strength was measured after 30 and 60 days of chemical exposure. The compressive strength results following chemical exposure indicated that the specimens containing the acrylic coating proved to be more resistant to chemical attacks. The control specimen without coating showed a much greater degree of deterioration. Therefore, the application of acrylic coating was invariably much more effective in improving the compressive strength as well as the resistance of mortar against chemical attacks. The results also indicated that among all the aggressive attacks, the sulphate environment has the most adverse effect in terms of lowering the strength.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Materials Research-An International Journal
Advances in Materials Research-An International Journal MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
27.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信