关于抗腐蚀和弹性钢筋混凝土系统远景的特刊:导论

IF 2.7 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
D. Trejo, R. Pillai
{"title":"关于抗腐蚀和弹性钢筋混凝土系统远景的特刊:导论","authors":"D. Trejo, R. Pillai","doi":"10.1080/23789689.2023.2192557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reinforced concrete is, in general, a very durable system. However, as designers pursue more efficient structural designs and subject these structures to more aggressive environments, these systems become increasingly susceptible to corrosion. Corrosion of steel reinforcement is one of the more prevalent mechanisms of deterioration in reinforced concrete systems. As the world’s infrastructure ages, the cost of repair and replacement of these systems increase at rapid rates. As new models, designs, materials and construction methods become available, the service life of these systems should be extended. This Special Issue initially focuses on current practices used throughout the world to mitigate corrosion of the steel reinforcement embedded in concrete. Alexander et al., Li and Ueda, and Geiker et al. provide an overview for durability based design in South Africa, Asia and Europe. The authors note that both prescriptiveand performance-based methods are currently in use with the objective of ensuring durability. All authors note the use of models, especially models to predict the ingress of chlorides into concrete, should be used to better predict the service life. However, Alexander et al. critique exposure classifications and conclude that both rational service life designs and relevant environmental exposure classifications are sorely needed. The authors also recommend that exposure classifications account for the various factors that influence reinforcement corrosion and the resulting structural damage. Li and Ueda review the state-of-theart of durability design in Asia and highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the current practices. The authors ultimately recommend a ‘multi-barrier’ strategy to achieve long-term performance and corrosion resistance of reinforced concrete systems. Geiker at al. provide a European perspective on durability design and argue that designers must understand basic deterioration mechanisms and resulting damage to better design the infrastructure systems. The authors also note that service life models should include the time from corrosion initiation to the end of life (i.e., the propagation phase) to provide more resilient designs. In addition to the design for durability perspectives from the different regions, understanding how to better predict and quantify factors that influence the service life are critical for improving resilience. Ogunsanya et al. present how the use of different de-icing chemicals can influence the critical chloride threshold, a critical parameter for assessing service life. Boschmann Käthler et al. present a review of how the critical chloride threshold values are assessed and make recommendations on how to quantify these critical chloride values. Interestingly, such a critical parameter for assessing the service life of reinforced concrete system has no standardized testing protocol (although advances are underway in several locales). Ahmed and Vaddey present interesting work on chloride testing of various cementitious systems and recommend that water-soluble chloride testing be used to quantify chlorides in concrete. Standardizing testing requirements are essential for ensuring corrosionresistant structures and yet the pursuit is on-going. Shakouri and Dhandapani & Santhanam focus on buildup and transport rates of chlorides in concrete systems. Shakouri reported on the surface build-up rate of chlorides and assesshow these build-up rates influence service life. He concluded that a universal test is needed to assess surface chlorides; interestingly, this is another critical input parameter for assessing the service life and yet there is limited standardization. Shakouri also reported the need for long-term field data. Dhandapani and Santhanam compared various test methods currently used to quantify chloride transport rates under various exposure conditions and report good correlation between several testing methods. Although much of the literature on chloride transport and service life of reinforced concrete systems focus on uncracked concrete, cracking in concrete is common. Yet limited work has been performed to assess how cracks influence corrosion and resulting service life of reinforced concrete systems. O’Reilly et al. assessed the corrosion performance of reinforced concrete specimens containing narrow cracks and reported that these narrow cracks can promote corrosion and potentially","PeriodicalId":45395,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure","volume":"8 1","pages":"143 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Special Issue on a vision for corrosion-resistant and resilient reinforced concrete systems: An introduction\",\"authors\":\"D. Trejo, R. Pillai\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23789689.2023.2192557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reinforced concrete is, in general, a very durable system. However, as designers pursue more efficient structural designs and subject these structures to more aggressive environments, these systems become increasingly susceptible to corrosion. Corrosion of steel reinforcement is one of the more prevalent mechanisms of deterioration in reinforced concrete systems. As the world’s infrastructure ages, the cost of repair and replacement of these systems increase at rapid rates. As new models, designs, materials and construction methods become available, the service life of these systems should be extended. This Special Issue initially focuses on current practices used throughout the world to mitigate corrosion of the steel reinforcement embedded in concrete. Alexander et al., Li and Ueda, and Geiker et al. provide an overview for durability based design in South Africa, Asia and Europe. The authors note that both prescriptiveand performance-based methods are currently in use with the objective of ensuring durability. All authors note the use of models, especially models to predict the ingress of chlorides into concrete, should be used to better predict the service life. However, Alexander et al. critique exposure classifications and conclude that both rational service life designs and relevant environmental exposure classifications are sorely needed. The authors also recommend that exposure classifications account for the various factors that influence reinforcement corrosion and the resulting structural damage. Li and Ueda review the state-of-theart of durability design in Asia and highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the current practices. The authors ultimately recommend a ‘multi-barrier’ strategy to achieve long-term performance and corrosion resistance of reinforced concrete systems. Geiker at al. provide a European perspective on durability design and argue that designers must understand basic deterioration mechanisms and resulting damage to better design the infrastructure systems. The authors also note that service life models should include the time from corrosion initiation to the end of life (i.e., the propagation phase) to provide more resilient designs. In addition to the design for durability perspectives from the different regions, understanding how to better predict and quantify factors that influence the service life are critical for improving resilience. Ogunsanya et al. present how the use of different de-icing chemicals can influence the critical chloride threshold, a critical parameter for assessing service life. Boschmann Käthler et al. present a review of how the critical chloride threshold values are assessed and make recommendations on how to quantify these critical chloride values. Interestingly, such a critical parameter for assessing the service life of reinforced concrete system has no standardized testing protocol (although advances are underway in several locales). Ahmed and Vaddey present interesting work on chloride testing of various cementitious systems and recommend that water-soluble chloride testing be used to quantify chlorides in concrete. Standardizing testing requirements are essential for ensuring corrosionresistant structures and yet the pursuit is on-going. Shakouri and Dhandapani & Santhanam focus on buildup and transport rates of chlorides in concrete systems. Shakouri reported on the surface build-up rate of chlorides and assesshow these build-up rates influence service life. He concluded that a universal test is needed to assess surface chlorides; interestingly, this is another critical input parameter for assessing the service life and yet there is limited standardization. Shakouri also reported the need for long-term field data. Dhandapani and Santhanam compared various test methods currently used to quantify chloride transport rates under various exposure conditions and report good correlation between several testing methods. Although much of the literature on chloride transport and service life of reinforced concrete systems focus on uncracked concrete, cracking in concrete is common. Yet limited work has been performed to assess how cracks influence corrosion and resulting service life of reinforced concrete systems. O’Reilly et al. assessed the corrosion performance of reinforced concrete specimens containing narrow cracks and reported that these narrow cracks can promote corrosion and potentially\",\"PeriodicalId\":45395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"143 - 144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2023.2192557\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2023.2192557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一般来说,钢筋混凝土是一种非常耐用的系统。然而,随着设计师追求更高效的结构设计,并将这些结构置于更具侵略性的环境中,这些系统变得越来越容易受到腐蚀。钢筋的腐蚀是钢筋混凝土系统中更普遍的劣化机制之一。随着世界基础设施的老化,这些系统的维修和更换成本迅速增加。随着新的模型、设计、材料和施工方法的出现,这些系统的使用寿命应该延长。本期特刊最初关注的是世界各地用于减轻混凝土中嵌入钢筋腐蚀的现行做法。Alexander等人、Li和Ueda以及Geiker等人概述了南非、亚洲和欧洲基于耐久性的设计。作者指出,目前正在使用规定和基于性能的方法,目的是确保耐用性。所有作者都注意到,应使用模型,特别是预测氯化物进入混凝土的模型,以更好地预测使用寿命。然而,Alexander等人对暴露分类进行了批判,并得出结论,迫切需要合理的使用寿命设计和相关的环境暴露分类。作者还建议,暴露分类应考虑影响钢筋腐蚀和由此产生的结构损伤的各种因素。李和上田回顾了亚洲耐久性设计的现状,并强调了当前实践的优势和劣势。作者最终建议采用“多屏障”策略,以实现钢筋混凝土系统的长期性能和耐腐蚀性。Geiker等人提供了欧洲对耐久性设计的观点,并认为设计师必须了解基本的退化机制和由此产生的损坏,才能更好地设计基础设施系统。作者还指出,使用寿命模型应包括从腐蚀开始到寿命结束的时间(即传播阶段),以提供更具弹性的设计。除了从不同地区的耐久性角度进行设计外,了解如何更好地预测和量化影响使用寿命的因素对于提高弹性至关重要。Ogunsanya等人介绍了不同除冰化学品的使用如何影响临界氯化物阈值,这是评估使用寿命的关键参数。Boschmann Käthler等人回顾了如何评估临界氯化物阈值,并就如何量化这些临界氯化物值提出了建议。有趣的是,这样一个评估钢筋混凝土系统使用寿命的关键参数没有标准化的测试协议(尽管一些地方正在取得进展)。Ahmed和Vaddey介绍了各种胶结系统氯化物测试的有趣工作,并建议使用水溶性氯化物测试来量化混凝土中的氯化物。标准化测试要求对于确保耐腐蚀结构至关重要,但这一追求仍在继续。Shakuri和Dhandapani&Santhanam专注于混凝土系统中氯化物的积累和传输速率。Shakuri报告了氯化物的表面积聚率,并评估了这些积聚率如何影响使用寿命。他得出的结论是,需要进行通用测试来评估表面氯化物;有趣的是,这是评估使用寿命的另一个关键输入参数,但标准化程度有限。Shakuri还报告了对长期实地数据的需求。Dhandapani和Santhanam比较了目前用于量化各种暴露条件下氯化物迁移率的各种测试方法,并报告了几种测试方法之间的良好相关性。尽管许多关于氯离子传输和钢筋混凝土系统使用寿命的文献都集中在未开裂的混凝土上,但混凝土中的开裂是常见的。然而,评估裂缝如何影响钢筋混凝土系统的腐蚀和由此产生的使用寿命的工作有限。O’Reilly等人评估了含有窄裂纹的钢筋混凝土试样的腐蚀性能,并报告称,这些窄裂纹会促进腐蚀
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Special Issue on a vision for corrosion-resistant and resilient reinforced concrete systems: An introduction
Reinforced concrete is, in general, a very durable system. However, as designers pursue more efficient structural designs and subject these structures to more aggressive environments, these systems become increasingly susceptible to corrosion. Corrosion of steel reinforcement is one of the more prevalent mechanisms of deterioration in reinforced concrete systems. As the world’s infrastructure ages, the cost of repair and replacement of these systems increase at rapid rates. As new models, designs, materials and construction methods become available, the service life of these systems should be extended. This Special Issue initially focuses on current practices used throughout the world to mitigate corrosion of the steel reinforcement embedded in concrete. Alexander et al., Li and Ueda, and Geiker et al. provide an overview for durability based design in South Africa, Asia and Europe. The authors note that both prescriptiveand performance-based methods are currently in use with the objective of ensuring durability. All authors note the use of models, especially models to predict the ingress of chlorides into concrete, should be used to better predict the service life. However, Alexander et al. critique exposure classifications and conclude that both rational service life designs and relevant environmental exposure classifications are sorely needed. The authors also recommend that exposure classifications account for the various factors that influence reinforcement corrosion and the resulting structural damage. Li and Ueda review the state-of-theart of durability design in Asia and highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the current practices. The authors ultimately recommend a ‘multi-barrier’ strategy to achieve long-term performance and corrosion resistance of reinforced concrete systems. Geiker at al. provide a European perspective on durability design and argue that designers must understand basic deterioration mechanisms and resulting damage to better design the infrastructure systems. The authors also note that service life models should include the time from corrosion initiation to the end of life (i.e., the propagation phase) to provide more resilient designs. In addition to the design for durability perspectives from the different regions, understanding how to better predict and quantify factors that influence the service life are critical for improving resilience. Ogunsanya et al. present how the use of different de-icing chemicals can influence the critical chloride threshold, a critical parameter for assessing service life. Boschmann Käthler et al. present a review of how the critical chloride threshold values are assessed and make recommendations on how to quantify these critical chloride values. Interestingly, such a critical parameter for assessing the service life of reinforced concrete system has no standardized testing protocol (although advances are underway in several locales). Ahmed and Vaddey present interesting work on chloride testing of various cementitious systems and recommend that water-soluble chloride testing be used to quantify chlorides in concrete. Standardizing testing requirements are essential for ensuring corrosionresistant structures and yet the pursuit is on-going. Shakouri and Dhandapani & Santhanam focus on buildup and transport rates of chlorides in concrete systems. Shakouri reported on the surface build-up rate of chlorides and assesshow these build-up rates influence service life. He concluded that a universal test is needed to assess surface chlorides; interestingly, this is another critical input parameter for assessing the service life and yet there is limited standardization. Shakouri also reported the need for long-term field data. Dhandapani and Santhanam compared various test methods currently used to quantify chloride transport rates under various exposure conditions and report good correlation between several testing methods. Although much of the literature on chloride transport and service life of reinforced concrete systems focus on uncracked concrete, cracking in concrete is common. Yet limited work has been performed to assess how cracks influence corrosion and resulting service life of reinforced concrete systems. O’Reilly et al. assessed the corrosion performance of reinforced concrete specimens containing narrow cracks and reported that these narrow cracks can promote corrosion and potentially
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on the sustainable development of resilient communities. Sustainability is defined in relation to the ability of infrastructure to address the needs of the present without sacrificing the ability of future generations to meet their needs. Resilience is considered in relation to both natural hazards (like earthquakes, tsunami, hurricanes, cyclones, tornado, flooding and drought) and anthropogenic hazards (like human errors and malevolent attacks.) Resilience is taken to depend both on the performance of the built and modified natural environment and on the contextual characteristics of social, economic and political institutions. Sustainability and resilience are considered both for physical and non-physical infrastructure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信