Q3 Arts and Humanities
Eva Krásová
{"title":"Od fenomenologů dále, k řeči blíže Nad novou knihou Tomáše Koblížka","authors":"Eva Krásová","doi":"10.14712/23366729.2022.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The text is a review study of Tomáš Koblížek’s book. After an introductory summary of the book, we discuss three main issues: 1) the simplistic conception of Edmund Husserl’s “phenomenology of speech”, 2) the insufficient analysis of basic concepts, especially language as “expression”, 3) the adoption and emphasis of the disjunctive conception of two ways of seeing speech — original and scientific — in the wake of H. Pos. We argue that it is the third issue in particular that undermines the final section of the book, which introduces the conceptual dimension of speech. In Koblížek’s conception, the theorization of ethics becomes possible only by returning to an “originary” consciousness of language and is incompatible with a scientific stance. We suggest that, in our view, the contradiction is not so strong and a merger of the two is — even in the spirit of the “Saussurean postulates” — possible.","PeriodicalId":36776,"journal":{"name":"Svet Literatury","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Svet Literatury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366729.2022.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章是对Tomáš Koblížek这本书的回顾研究。在对本书进行介绍性总结之后,我们将讨论三个主要问题:1)胡塞尔的“言语现象学”概念过于简单化;2)对基本概念的分析不足,尤其是对语言作为“表达”的分析不足;3)继H. Pos之后,采用并强调了两种看待言语的方式——原始的和科学的——的分离概念。我们认为,尤其是第三个问题破坏了本书的最后一部分,该部分介绍了言语的概念维度。在Koblížek的概念中,伦理的理论化只有回归到语言的“原始”意识才有可能,与科学立场是不相容的。我们认为,在我们看来,矛盾并不那么强烈,两者的合并是可能的,甚至按照“索绪尔的假定”的精神也是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Od fenomenologů dále, k řeči blíže Nad novou knihou Tomáše Koblížka
The text is a review study of Tomáš Koblížek’s book. After an introductory summary of the book, we discuss three main issues: 1) the simplistic conception of Edmund Husserl’s “phenomenology of speech”, 2) the insufficient analysis of basic concepts, especially language as “expression”, 3) the adoption and emphasis of the disjunctive conception of two ways of seeing speech — original and scientific — in the wake of H. Pos. We argue that it is the third issue in particular that undermines the final section of the book, which introduces the conceptual dimension of speech. In Koblížek’s conception, the theorization of ethics becomes possible only by returning to an “originary” consciousness of language and is incompatible with a scientific stance. We suggest that, in our view, the contradiction is not so strong and a merger of the two is — even in the spirit of the “Saussurean postulates” — possible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Svet Literatury
Svet Literatury Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信