化工行业预测性维护供应商筛选方法

Birgit Braun, Michael Dessauer, Kaytlin Henderson, You Peng, Mary Beth Seasholtz
{"title":"化工行业预测性维护供应商筛选方法","authors":"Birgit Braun,&nbsp;Michael Dessauer,&nbsp;Kaytlin Henderson,&nbsp;You Peng,&nbsp;Mary Beth Seasholtz","doi":"10.1002/amp2.10109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As an industry leader in digitalization and implementation of value-added data-driven methodologies, Dow is executing a structured evaluation of predictive maintenance (PdM) vendor offerings. PdM offers a tailored alternative to scheduled maintenance or run-to-failure operations, but the identification of suitable solutions offered by third parties is not trivial given the large number of offerings. This paper describes a methodology developed by Dow to deal with the challenge of efficiently screening many vendors with relevant PdM offerings. Prior to the evaluation process, scoring criteria for vendor performance must be identified. For Dow, these included the requirements (1) models can be created and deployed easily, (2) modeled asset health provides information for root causes, (3) the software operates in our preferred IT architecture, (4) confidential data cannot leave the premises, and (5) models have some transparency. The process involves four steps beginning with vendor identification, which explored existing relationships and landscape surveys. Following was the completion of a questionnaire by vendors about the offering. Upon positive completion, a dataset for two reflux pumps was provided for a first demonstration of the tool. The model performance was compared to internal modeling efforts, of which key results are shared in this paper. The last step involved an in-depth evaluation including on-site installation and online deployment of the PdM models, allowing scoring of all categories. What is presented herein is a framework that can be utilized for screening predictive maintenance modeling tools as well as many analytics applications arising in the age of Industry 4.0.</p>","PeriodicalId":87290,"journal":{"name":"Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aiche.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/amp2.10109","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodology to screen vendors for predictive maintenance in the chemical industry\",\"authors\":\"Birgit Braun,&nbsp;Michael Dessauer,&nbsp;Kaytlin Henderson,&nbsp;You Peng,&nbsp;Mary Beth Seasholtz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/amp2.10109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As an industry leader in digitalization and implementation of value-added data-driven methodologies, Dow is executing a structured evaluation of predictive maintenance (PdM) vendor offerings. PdM offers a tailored alternative to scheduled maintenance or run-to-failure operations, but the identification of suitable solutions offered by third parties is not trivial given the large number of offerings. This paper describes a methodology developed by Dow to deal with the challenge of efficiently screening many vendors with relevant PdM offerings. Prior to the evaluation process, scoring criteria for vendor performance must be identified. For Dow, these included the requirements (1) models can be created and deployed easily, (2) modeled asset health provides information for root causes, (3) the software operates in our preferred IT architecture, (4) confidential data cannot leave the premises, and (5) models have some transparency. The process involves four steps beginning with vendor identification, which explored existing relationships and landscape surveys. Following was the completion of a questionnaire by vendors about the offering. Upon positive completion, a dataset for two reflux pumps was provided for a first demonstration of the tool. The model performance was compared to internal modeling efforts, of which key results are shared in this paper. The last step involved an in-depth evaluation including on-site installation and online deployment of the PdM models, allowing scoring of all categories. What is presented herein is a framework that can be utilized for screening predictive maintenance modeling tools as well as many analytics applications arising in the age of Industry 4.0.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://aiche.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/amp2.10109\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/amp2.10109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/amp2.10109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

作为数字化和实施增值数据驱动方法的行业领导者,陶氏正在对预测性维护(PdM)供应商产品进行结构化评估。PdM为计划维护或从运行到故障的操作提供了定制的替代方案,但是由于产品数量众多,识别第三方提供的合适解决方案并非易事。本文描述了陶氏公司开发的一种方法,以应对有效筛选具有相关PdM产品的许多供应商的挑战。在评估过程之前,必须确定供应商绩效的评分标准。对于陶氏来说,这些要求包括(1)模型可以轻松创建和部署,(2)建模的资产健康状况提供了根本原因的信息,(3)软件在我们首选的IT架构中运行,(4)机密数据不能离开场所,以及(5)模型具有一定的透明度。这个过程包括四个步骤,从供应商识别开始,探索现有的关系和景观调查。以下是供应商填写的关于此次发售的问卷。完井后,提供了两个回流泵的数据集,用于该工具的首次演示。将模型性能与内部建模工作进行了比较,并分享了其中的关键结果。最后一步涉及深入的评估,包括PdM模型的现场安装和在线部署,允许对所有类别进行评分。本文提供的框架可用于筛选预测性维护建模工具以及工业4.0时代出现的许多分析应用程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methodology to screen vendors for predictive maintenance in the chemical industry

As an industry leader in digitalization and implementation of value-added data-driven methodologies, Dow is executing a structured evaluation of predictive maintenance (PdM) vendor offerings. PdM offers a tailored alternative to scheduled maintenance or run-to-failure operations, but the identification of suitable solutions offered by third parties is not trivial given the large number of offerings. This paper describes a methodology developed by Dow to deal with the challenge of efficiently screening many vendors with relevant PdM offerings. Prior to the evaluation process, scoring criteria for vendor performance must be identified. For Dow, these included the requirements (1) models can be created and deployed easily, (2) modeled asset health provides information for root causes, (3) the software operates in our preferred IT architecture, (4) confidential data cannot leave the premises, and (5) models have some transparency. The process involves four steps beginning with vendor identification, which explored existing relationships and landscape surveys. Following was the completion of a questionnaire by vendors about the offering. Upon positive completion, a dataset for two reflux pumps was provided for a first demonstration of the tool. The model performance was compared to internal modeling efforts, of which key results are shared in this paper. The last step involved an in-depth evaluation including on-site installation and online deployment of the PdM models, allowing scoring of all categories. What is presented herein is a framework that can be utilized for screening predictive maintenance modeling tools as well as many analytics applications arising in the age of Industry 4.0.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信