不同年龄组全麻期间经典喉罩气道插入的成功率

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
M. Mortazavi, Atefeh Shadi, M. Parish
{"title":"不同年龄组全麻期间经典喉罩气道插入的成功率","authors":"M. Mortazavi, Atefeh Shadi, M. Parish","doi":"10.34172/cjmb.2022.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Uncertainty about the effect of age on the success rate of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion led us to conduct the present study to evaluate the success rate of LMA in airway management in different age groups. Materials and Methods: A total of 183 patients, who were admitted to Shohada hospital (Tabriz, Iran) during 2018-2019, were enrolled in this descriptive, cross-sectional, prospective study. The patients were selected through the convenience sampling method and divided into 4 age groups. After anesthesia, patients were compared in terms of duration and number of LMA insertion attempts and LMA insertion complications. The data were analyzed using SPSS20 through one-way ANOVA and the Chi-square test at P<0.05). Results: There were significant statistical differences between different age groups regarding resistance against LMA insertion (P=0.008) so that insertion was most comfortable and easy in the first attempt in the adult group compared to other groups. However, no significant statistical difference was observed between different groups in terms of the rate of air leakage (P=0.129), the duration of successful LMA insertion (P=0.119), and the number of LMA insertion attempts (P=0.091). Regarding LMA insertion complications, laryngospasm was significantly higher in the middle-age and aged group (P=0.009), and blood observation on LMA was significantly higher in the pre-school and child group (P=0.005). Conclusions: According to the results of this study, no difference was found between different groups in terms of successful LMA insertion and post LMA insertion complications.","PeriodicalId":43540,"journal":{"name":"Crescent Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Success Rate of Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion During General Anesthesia in Different Age Groups\",\"authors\":\"M. Mortazavi, Atefeh Shadi, M. Parish\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/cjmb.2022.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Uncertainty about the effect of age on the success rate of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion led us to conduct the present study to evaluate the success rate of LMA in airway management in different age groups. Materials and Methods: A total of 183 patients, who were admitted to Shohada hospital (Tabriz, Iran) during 2018-2019, were enrolled in this descriptive, cross-sectional, prospective study. The patients were selected through the convenience sampling method and divided into 4 age groups. After anesthesia, patients were compared in terms of duration and number of LMA insertion attempts and LMA insertion complications. The data were analyzed using SPSS20 through one-way ANOVA and the Chi-square test at P<0.05). Results: There were significant statistical differences between different age groups regarding resistance against LMA insertion (P=0.008) so that insertion was most comfortable and easy in the first attempt in the adult group compared to other groups. However, no significant statistical difference was observed between different groups in terms of the rate of air leakage (P=0.129), the duration of successful LMA insertion (P=0.119), and the number of LMA insertion attempts (P=0.091). Regarding LMA insertion complications, laryngospasm was significantly higher in the middle-age and aged group (P=0.009), and blood observation on LMA was significantly higher in the pre-school and child group (P=0.005). Conclusions: According to the results of this study, no difference was found between different groups in terms of successful LMA insertion and post LMA insertion complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crescent Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crescent Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/cjmb.2022.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crescent Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/cjmb.2022.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于年龄对喉罩气道(LMA)置入成功率影响的不确定性,我们进行了本研究,以评估不同年龄组喉罩气道管理的成功率。材料与方法:本研究纳入了2018-2019年伊朗大不里士Shohada医院收治的183例患者。采用方便抽样法,将患者分为4个年龄组。麻醉后,比较患者LMA插入的持续时间和次数以及LMA插入的并发症。采用SPSS20进行单因素方差分析,卡方检验(P<0.05)。结果:不同年龄组间LMA插入阻力比较,差异有统计学意义(P=0.008),成年组首次插入较其他组舒适、容易。但两组间在漏气率(P=0.129)、LMA插入成功时间(P=0.119)、LMA插入尝试次数(P=0.091)方面差异无统计学意义。在LMA插入并发症方面,中老年组喉痉挛发生率明显高于老年组(P=0.009),学龄前儿童组喉痉挛发生率明显高于老年组(P=0.005)。结论:根据本研究的结果,不同组在LMA插入成功和LMA插入后并发症方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Success Rate of Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion During General Anesthesia in Different Age Groups
Objectives: Uncertainty about the effect of age on the success rate of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion led us to conduct the present study to evaluate the success rate of LMA in airway management in different age groups. Materials and Methods: A total of 183 patients, who were admitted to Shohada hospital (Tabriz, Iran) during 2018-2019, were enrolled in this descriptive, cross-sectional, prospective study. The patients were selected through the convenience sampling method and divided into 4 age groups. After anesthesia, patients were compared in terms of duration and number of LMA insertion attempts and LMA insertion complications. The data were analyzed using SPSS20 through one-way ANOVA and the Chi-square test at P<0.05). Results: There were significant statistical differences between different age groups regarding resistance against LMA insertion (P=0.008) so that insertion was most comfortable and easy in the first attempt in the adult group compared to other groups. However, no significant statistical difference was observed between different groups in terms of the rate of air leakage (P=0.129), the duration of successful LMA insertion (P=0.119), and the number of LMA insertion attempts (P=0.091). Regarding LMA insertion complications, laryngospasm was significantly higher in the middle-age and aged group (P=0.009), and blood observation on LMA was significantly higher in the pre-school and child group (P=0.005). Conclusions: According to the results of this study, no difference was found between different groups in terms of successful LMA insertion and post LMA insertion complications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: All kind of knowledge contributing to the development of science by its content, value, level and originality will be covered by CJMB. Problems of public health and their solutions are at the head of the windows opening us to the world. The "Crescent Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences" is a modern forum for scientific communication,coveringall aspects medical sciences and biological sciences, in basic and clinical sciences, mainly including: • Anatomy • Antioxidant Therapy in Reproduction Medicine • Biochemistry • Biophysics • Breast Cancer • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine • Cell Biology • Dentistry sciences • Diabetes • Embryology • Endocrinology • Genetics • Hematology • Herbal Medicine • Histology • Internal Medicine • Internal Medicine, surgery • Medical Education • Medical Laboratory Sciences • Medical Microbiology • Microbiology • Mycology, Neurosciences • Nerosciences • Nutrition • Oncology • Parasitology • Pathology • Pharmacognosy • Pharmacology • Psychiatry • Sex-Based Biology • Sports Medicine • Urogynecology • Virology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信