期权估值中的模型不确定性与定价绩效

D. Bams, Gildas Blanchard, T. Lehnert
{"title":"期权估值中的模型不确定性与定价绩效","authors":"D. Bams, Gildas Blanchard, T. Lehnert","doi":"10.3905/jod.2019.1.086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this article is to evaluate the performance of the option pricing model at the cross-sectional level. For that purpose, the authors propose a statistical framework, in which they in particular account for the uncertainty associated with the reported pricing performance. Instead of a single figure, the authors determine an entire probability distribution function for the loss function that is used to measure the performance of the option pricing model. This method enables them to visualize the effect of parameter uncertainty on the reported pricing performance. Using a data-driven approach, the authors confirm previous evidence that standard volatility models with clustering and leverage effects are sufficient for the option pricing purpose. In addition, they demonstrate that there is short-term persistence but long-term heterogeneity in cross-sectional option pricing information. This finding has two important implications. First, it justifies the practitioner’s routine to refrain from time series approaches and instead estimate option pricing models on a cross section by cross section basis. Second, the long-term heterogeneity in option prices pinpoints the importance of measuring, comparing, and testing the option pricing model for each cross section separately. To the authors’ knowledge no statistical testing framework has previously been applied to a single cross section of option prices. They propose a method that addresses that need. The proposed framework can be applied to a broad set of models and data. In the empirical part of the article, they show by means of example, an application that uses a discrete time volatility model on S&P 500 index options. TOPICS: Options, volatility measures Key Findings • Absolute pricing performance, measured by a loss-function, is an inappropriate criteria to benchmark competing option pricing models at the cross-sectional level. • The long-term heterogeneity in cross-sectional option pricing information and the uncertainty of reported pricing performance calls for the necessity to rely on an entire probability distribution function of the loss function when comparing models performance. • This article proposes a statistical framework, based on a data-driven approach, to compare model performance accounting for model uncertainty applicable to a single cross-section of option prices.","PeriodicalId":34223,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Derivat","volume":"27 1","pages":"31 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model Uncertainty and Pricing Performance in Option Valuation\",\"authors\":\"D. Bams, Gildas Blanchard, T. Lehnert\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jod.2019.1.086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this article is to evaluate the performance of the option pricing model at the cross-sectional level. For that purpose, the authors propose a statistical framework, in which they in particular account for the uncertainty associated with the reported pricing performance. Instead of a single figure, the authors determine an entire probability distribution function for the loss function that is used to measure the performance of the option pricing model. This method enables them to visualize the effect of parameter uncertainty on the reported pricing performance. Using a data-driven approach, the authors confirm previous evidence that standard volatility models with clustering and leverage effects are sufficient for the option pricing purpose. In addition, they demonstrate that there is short-term persistence but long-term heterogeneity in cross-sectional option pricing information. This finding has two important implications. First, it justifies the practitioner’s routine to refrain from time series approaches and instead estimate option pricing models on a cross section by cross section basis. Second, the long-term heterogeneity in option prices pinpoints the importance of measuring, comparing, and testing the option pricing model for each cross section separately. To the authors’ knowledge no statistical testing framework has previously been applied to a single cross section of option prices. They propose a method that addresses that need. The proposed framework can be applied to a broad set of models and data. In the empirical part of the article, they show by means of example, an application that uses a discrete time volatility model on S&P 500 index options. TOPICS: Options, volatility measures Key Findings • Absolute pricing performance, measured by a loss-function, is an inappropriate criteria to benchmark competing option pricing models at the cross-sectional level. • The long-term heterogeneity in cross-sectional option pricing information and the uncertainty of reported pricing performance calls for the necessity to rely on an entire probability distribution function of the loss function when comparing models performance. • This article proposes a statistical framework, based on a data-driven approach, to compare model performance accounting for model uncertainty applicable to a single cross-section of option prices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Derivat\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"31 - 49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Derivat\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.2019.1.086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Derivat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.2019.1.086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是在横截面水平上评估期权定价模型的性能。为此,作者提出了一个统计框架,在这个框架中,他们特别考虑了与所报告的定价表现有关的不确定性。而不是一个单一的数字,作者确定了一个完整的概率分布函数的损失函数,是用来衡量期权定价模型的性能。这种方法使他们能够可视化参数不确定性对报告的定价性能的影响。使用数据驱动的方法,作者证实了先前的证据,即具有聚类和杠杆效应的标准波动率模型足以用于期权定价目的。此外,他们还证明了横截面期权定价信息存在短期持久性和长期异质性。这一发现有两个重要的含义。首先,它证明了从业者的惯例,即避免使用时间序列方法,而是在横截面的基础上估计期权定价模型。其次,期权价格的长期异质性指出了分别测量、比较和测试每个横截面的期权定价模型的重要性。据作者所知,以前没有统计测试框架被应用于期权价格的单一横截面。他们提出了一种解决这一需求的方法。所建议的框架可以应用于广泛的模型和数据集。在本文的实证部分,他们通过实例展示了在标准普尔500指数期权上使用离散时间波动模型的应用程序。•以损失函数衡量的绝对定价表现,在横截面水平上是一个不合适的基准竞争期权定价模型。•横断面期权定价信息的长期异质性和报告定价绩效的不确定性要求在比较模型绩效时依赖损失函数的整个概率分布函数。•本文提出了一个基于数据驱动方法的统计框架,以比较适用于单个期权价格横截面的模型不确定性的模型绩效核算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Model Uncertainty and Pricing Performance in Option Valuation
The objective of this article is to evaluate the performance of the option pricing model at the cross-sectional level. For that purpose, the authors propose a statistical framework, in which they in particular account for the uncertainty associated with the reported pricing performance. Instead of a single figure, the authors determine an entire probability distribution function for the loss function that is used to measure the performance of the option pricing model. This method enables them to visualize the effect of parameter uncertainty on the reported pricing performance. Using a data-driven approach, the authors confirm previous evidence that standard volatility models with clustering and leverage effects are sufficient for the option pricing purpose. In addition, they demonstrate that there is short-term persistence but long-term heterogeneity in cross-sectional option pricing information. This finding has two important implications. First, it justifies the practitioner’s routine to refrain from time series approaches and instead estimate option pricing models on a cross section by cross section basis. Second, the long-term heterogeneity in option prices pinpoints the importance of measuring, comparing, and testing the option pricing model for each cross section separately. To the authors’ knowledge no statistical testing framework has previously been applied to a single cross section of option prices. They propose a method that addresses that need. The proposed framework can be applied to a broad set of models and data. In the empirical part of the article, they show by means of example, an application that uses a discrete time volatility model on S&P 500 index options. TOPICS: Options, volatility measures Key Findings • Absolute pricing performance, measured by a loss-function, is an inappropriate criteria to benchmark competing option pricing models at the cross-sectional level. • The long-term heterogeneity in cross-sectional option pricing information and the uncertainty of reported pricing performance calls for the necessity to rely on an entire probability distribution function of the loss function when comparing models performance. • This article proposes a statistical framework, based on a data-driven approach, to compare model performance accounting for model uncertainty applicable to a single cross-section of option prices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信