Nuno Sousa, Andre Santa-Cruz, Antonio Melo, Camila Sousa, Fernanda Marques, Hugo Leite-Almeida, Lucimara Souza, Marco Marangoni, Marcia Raia, Maurilio Santos, Nuno Goncalves, Pedro Morgado, Pedro Souza, Rita Matos Sousa, Sara Gomes, Wilfredo Santos, Beatriz Araújo, Eliana Amaral, Vitor Pereira, Peter Scoles
{"title":"卫生专业人员和机构认证过程术语指南","authors":"Nuno Sousa, Andre Santa-Cruz, Antonio Melo, Camila Sousa, Fernanda Marques, Hugo Leite-Almeida, Lucimara Souza, Marco Marangoni, Marcia Raia, Maurilio Santos, Nuno Goncalves, Pedro Morgado, Pedro Souza, Rita Matos Sousa, Sara Gomes, Wilfredo Santos, Beatriz Araújo, Eliana Amaral, Vitor Pereira, Peter Scoles","doi":"10.12688/mep.19566.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accreditation processes for health care professions are designed to ensure that individuals and programs in these fields meet established standards of quality and effectiveness. The accelerating pace of globalization in the health care professions has increased the need for a shared understanding of the vocabulary of evaluation, assessment, and accreditation. The psychometric principles of valid and reliable assessment are commonly accepted, but the terminology is confusing. We believe that all stakeholders - evaluators, faculty, students but also the community - will benefit from a shared language and common set of definitions. We recognize that not all readers will agree with the definitions we propose, but we hope that this guide will help to ensure clarity, consistency, transparency, and fairness, and that it will promote through the stimulation of a debate greater collaboration across national and international boundaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":" ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A hitchhikers' guide to the terminology of accreditation processes for health professionals and institutions.\",\"authors\":\"Nuno Sousa, Andre Santa-Cruz, Antonio Melo, Camila Sousa, Fernanda Marques, Hugo Leite-Almeida, Lucimara Souza, Marco Marangoni, Marcia Raia, Maurilio Santos, Nuno Goncalves, Pedro Morgado, Pedro Souza, Rita Matos Sousa, Sara Gomes, Wilfredo Santos, Beatriz Araújo, Eliana Amaral, Vitor Pereira, Peter Scoles\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/mep.19566.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accreditation processes for health care professions are designed to ensure that individuals and programs in these fields meet established standards of quality and effectiveness. The accelerating pace of globalization in the health care professions has increased the need for a shared understanding of the vocabulary of evaluation, assessment, and accreditation. The psychometric principles of valid and reliable assessment are commonly accepted, but the terminology is confusing. We believe that all stakeholders - evaluators, faculty, students but also the community - will benefit from a shared language and common set of definitions. We recognize that not all readers will agree with the definitions we propose, but we hope that this guide will help to ensure clarity, consistency, transparency, and fairness, and that it will promote through the stimulation of a debate greater collaboration across national and international boundaries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedEdPublish (2016)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652034/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedEdPublish (2016)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19566.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19566.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A hitchhikers' guide to the terminology of accreditation processes for health professionals and institutions.
Accreditation processes for health care professions are designed to ensure that individuals and programs in these fields meet established standards of quality and effectiveness. The accelerating pace of globalization in the health care professions has increased the need for a shared understanding of the vocabulary of evaluation, assessment, and accreditation. The psychometric principles of valid and reliable assessment are commonly accepted, but the terminology is confusing. We believe that all stakeholders - evaluators, faculty, students but also the community - will benefit from a shared language and common set of definitions. We recognize that not all readers will agree with the definitions we propose, but we hope that this guide will help to ensure clarity, consistency, transparency, and fairness, and that it will promote through the stimulation of a debate greater collaboration across national and international boundaries.