M.R. Sosnowski, M.R. Ayres, M.G. McCarthy, E.S. Scott
{"title":"葡萄品种(Vitis vinifera)对葡萄树干病原菌的易感性各不相同","authors":"M.R. Sosnowski, M.R. Ayres, M.G. McCarthy, E.S. Scott","doi":"10.1111/ajgw.12531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Eutypa and Botryosphaeria dieback are diseases that affect vineyards worldwide, reducing productivity and longevity. The ability of the causal pathogens <i>Eutypa lata</i> and <i>Diplodia seriata</i> to colonise grapevine canes was investigated in the search for resistance or tolerance to trunk diseases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>Visual assessments of 174 winegrape cultivars (<i>Vitis vinifera</i>) in a mature germplasm collection in the Barossa Valley in South Australia revealed substantial variation (0–98%) in severity of foliar symptoms and dieback. A selection of 18 cultivars representing those without symptoms or low (<10%) severity was compared with the susceptible cultivars Shiraz and Sauvignon Blanc. Inoculation of canes in situ in the vineyard and detached canes in the greenhouse, confirmed variability among cultivars for the extent of pathogen colonisation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Cultivars varied in susceptibility to colonisation by <i>E. lata</i> and <i>D. seriata</i>, with some differences between the two pathogens in terms of the ranking of cultivars. Muscadelle was most resistant to colonisation by both pathogens, and Sauvignonasse was the most susceptible.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance of the Study</h3>\n \n <p>Knowledge of cultivar susceptibility to grapevine trunk diseases will assist in prioritisation of disease management strategies. Identification of cultivars with resistance could inform selection of planting material and may lead to improved breeding programs in the future.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8582,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajgw.12531","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Winegrape cultivars (Vitis vinifera) vary in susceptibility to the grapevine trunk pathogens Eutypa lata and Diplodia seriata\",\"authors\":\"M.R. Sosnowski, M.R. Ayres, M.G. McCarthy, E.S. Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajgw.12531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eutypa and Botryosphaeria dieback are diseases that affect vineyards worldwide, reducing productivity and longevity. The ability of the causal pathogens <i>Eutypa lata</i> and <i>Diplodia seriata</i> to colonise grapevine canes was investigated in the search for resistance or tolerance to trunk diseases.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Visual assessments of 174 winegrape cultivars (<i>Vitis vinifera</i>) in a mature germplasm collection in the Barossa Valley in South Australia revealed substantial variation (0–98%) in severity of foliar symptoms and dieback. A selection of 18 cultivars representing those without symptoms or low (<10%) severity was compared with the susceptible cultivars Shiraz and Sauvignon Blanc. Inoculation of canes in situ in the vineyard and detached canes in the greenhouse, confirmed variability among cultivars for the extent of pathogen colonisation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cultivars varied in susceptibility to colonisation by <i>E. lata</i> and <i>D. seriata</i>, with some differences between the two pathogens in terms of the ranking of cultivars. Muscadelle was most resistant to colonisation by both pathogens, and Sauvignonasse was the most susceptible.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Significance of the Study</h3>\\n \\n <p>Knowledge of cultivar susceptibility to grapevine trunk diseases will assist in prioritisation of disease management strategies. Identification of cultivars with resistance could inform selection of planting material and may lead to improved breeding programs in the future.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajgw.12531\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajgw.12531\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajgw.12531","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Winegrape cultivars (Vitis vinifera) vary in susceptibility to the grapevine trunk pathogens Eutypa lata and Diplodia seriata
Background and Aims
Eutypa and Botryosphaeria dieback are diseases that affect vineyards worldwide, reducing productivity and longevity. The ability of the causal pathogens Eutypa lata and Diplodia seriata to colonise grapevine canes was investigated in the search for resistance or tolerance to trunk diseases.
Methods and Results
Visual assessments of 174 winegrape cultivars (Vitis vinifera) in a mature germplasm collection in the Barossa Valley in South Australia revealed substantial variation (0–98%) in severity of foliar symptoms and dieback. A selection of 18 cultivars representing those without symptoms or low (<10%) severity was compared with the susceptible cultivars Shiraz and Sauvignon Blanc. Inoculation of canes in situ in the vineyard and detached canes in the greenhouse, confirmed variability among cultivars for the extent of pathogen colonisation.
Conclusions
Cultivars varied in susceptibility to colonisation by E. lata and D. seriata, with some differences between the two pathogens in terms of the ranking of cultivars. Muscadelle was most resistant to colonisation by both pathogens, and Sauvignonasse was the most susceptible.
Significance of the Study
Knowledge of cultivar susceptibility to grapevine trunk diseases will assist in prioritisation of disease management strategies. Identification of cultivars with resistance could inform selection of planting material and may lead to improved breeding programs in the future.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research provides a forum for the exchange of information about new and significant research in viticulture, oenology and related fields, and aims to promote these disciplines throughout the world. The Journal publishes results from original research in all areas of viticulture and oenology. This includes issues relating to wine, table and drying grape production; grapevine and rootstock biology, genetics, diseases and improvement; viticultural practices; juice and wine production technologies; vine and wine microbiology; quality effects of processing, packaging and inputs; wine chemistry; sensory science and consumer preferences; and environmental impacts of grape and wine production. Research related to other fermented or distilled beverages may also be considered. In addition to full-length research papers and review articles, short research or technical papers presenting new and highly topical information derived from a complete study (i.e. not preliminary data) may also be published. Special features and supplementary issues comprising the proceedings of workshops and conferences will appear periodically.