牲畜隔离对华盛顿和俄勒冈州河岸和河岸植被的影响

IF 0.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY
M. Krall, P. Roni, C. Clark, K. Ross
{"title":"牲畜隔离对华盛顿和俄勒冈州河岸和河岸植被的影响","authors":"M. Krall, P. Roni, C. Clark, K. Ross","doi":"10.3955/046.095.0101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Livestock exclusion is a widespread restoration technique in the Pacific Northwest to protect and improve riparian and stream habitats. To assess stream restoration outcomes from excluding livestock, the Washington State Salmon Recovery Funding Board and the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board evaluated 12 livestock exclusion projects from 2004 to 2017 using a before-after control-impact design. Paired treatment and control reaches were monitored once before restoration implementation (year 0) and several years after implementation (years 1, 3, 5, and 10) to assess bank erosion, bank canopy cover, riparian vegetation structure, pool tail fine sediment, and exclosure fencing function. Livestock exclusion significantly reduced bank erosion and bare ground. Bank erosion in treatment reaches decreased from 44% pre-project to 11% by year 10. In treatment reaches, bare ground was over 1.5 times lower in year 10 than pre-project. Most treatment reaches had intact fencing at the conclusion of the ten-year monitoring period, but there were instances where fencing did not fully function as intended, allowing livestock to access riparian areas inside the exclosure. Several metrics did not respond over time, which may be the result of several factors, including limitations of the sampling protocols, evidence of livestock grazing in treatment reaches, lack of site stratification, control reaches that were not well matched with treatment reaches, and short-duration of pre-project data collection. Despite these limitations, we still detected significant decreases in bank erosion and bare ground within treatment reaches. Future livestock exclusion monitoring should consider focus on ensuring fence maintenance, improved monitoring oversight, and the use of more quantitative monitoring protocols.","PeriodicalId":49743,"journal":{"name":"Northwest Science","volume":"95 1","pages":"1 - 21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Livestock Exclusion on Stream Banks and Riparian Vegetation in Washington and Oregon\",\"authors\":\"M. Krall, P. Roni, C. Clark, K. Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.3955/046.095.0101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Livestock exclusion is a widespread restoration technique in the Pacific Northwest to protect and improve riparian and stream habitats. To assess stream restoration outcomes from excluding livestock, the Washington State Salmon Recovery Funding Board and the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board evaluated 12 livestock exclusion projects from 2004 to 2017 using a before-after control-impact design. Paired treatment and control reaches were monitored once before restoration implementation (year 0) and several years after implementation (years 1, 3, 5, and 10) to assess bank erosion, bank canopy cover, riparian vegetation structure, pool tail fine sediment, and exclosure fencing function. Livestock exclusion significantly reduced bank erosion and bare ground. Bank erosion in treatment reaches decreased from 44% pre-project to 11% by year 10. In treatment reaches, bare ground was over 1.5 times lower in year 10 than pre-project. Most treatment reaches had intact fencing at the conclusion of the ten-year monitoring period, but there were instances where fencing did not fully function as intended, allowing livestock to access riparian areas inside the exclosure. Several metrics did not respond over time, which may be the result of several factors, including limitations of the sampling protocols, evidence of livestock grazing in treatment reaches, lack of site stratification, control reaches that were not well matched with treatment reaches, and short-duration of pre-project data collection. Despite these limitations, we still detected significant decreases in bank erosion and bare ground within treatment reaches. Future livestock exclusion monitoring should consider focus on ensuring fence maintenance, improved monitoring oversight, and the use of more quantitative monitoring protocols.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Northwest Science\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Northwest Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3955/046.095.0101\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northwest Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3955/046.095.0101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

牲畜排斥是西北太平洋地区广泛采用的一种保护和改善河岸和溪流栖息地的恢复技术。为了评估排除牲畜的河流恢复结果,华盛顿州鲑鱼恢复基金委员会和俄勒冈流域改善委员会使用前后控制影响设计评估了2004年至2017年的12个牲畜排除项目。在恢复实施前(第0年)和实施后几年(第1、3、5和10年)对成对处理和控制河段进行监测,以评估河岸侵蚀、河岸冠层覆盖、河岸植被结构、池尾细沉积物和围护围栏功能。排除牲畜显著减少了河岸侵蚀和裸露地面。治理河段的河岸侵蚀从项目前的44%下降到第10年的11%。在处理区,第10年的裸地比项目前低1.5倍以上。在十年监测期结束时,大多数治疗河段都有完整的围栏,但在某些情况下,围栏没有充分发挥预期的作用,使牲畜能够进入围栏内的河岸地区。随着时间的推移,一些指标没有响应,这可能是几个因素的结果,包括采样方案的局限性、处理河段放牧牲畜的证据、缺乏现场分层、控制河段与处理河段不匹配,以及项目前数据收集时间短。尽管存在这些限制,我们仍然检测到在处理范围内河岸侵蚀和裸露地面显著减少。未来的牲畜隔离监测应考虑将重点放在确保围栏的维护、改进监测监督以及使用更多的定量监测方案上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Livestock Exclusion on Stream Banks and Riparian Vegetation in Washington and Oregon
Abstract Livestock exclusion is a widespread restoration technique in the Pacific Northwest to protect and improve riparian and stream habitats. To assess stream restoration outcomes from excluding livestock, the Washington State Salmon Recovery Funding Board and the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board evaluated 12 livestock exclusion projects from 2004 to 2017 using a before-after control-impact design. Paired treatment and control reaches were monitored once before restoration implementation (year 0) and several years after implementation (years 1, 3, 5, and 10) to assess bank erosion, bank canopy cover, riparian vegetation structure, pool tail fine sediment, and exclosure fencing function. Livestock exclusion significantly reduced bank erosion and bare ground. Bank erosion in treatment reaches decreased from 44% pre-project to 11% by year 10. In treatment reaches, bare ground was over 1.5 times lower in year 10 than pre-project. Most treatment reaches had intact fencing at the conclusion of the ten-year monitoring period, but there were instances where fencing did not fully function as intended, allowing livestock to access riparian areas inside the exclosure. Several metrics did not respond over time, which may be the result of several factors, including limitations of the sampling protocols, evidence of livestock grazing in treatment reaches, lack of site stratification, control reaches that were not well matched with treatment reaches, and short-duration of pre-project data collection. Despite these limitations, we still detected significant decreases in bank erosion and bare ground within treatment reaches. Future livestock exclusion monitoring should consider focus on ensuring fence maintenance, improved monitoring oversight, and the use of more quantitative monitoring protocols.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Northwest Science
Northwest Science 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The pages of Northwest Science are open to original and fundamental research in the basic, applied, and social sciences. All submissions are refereed by at least two qualified peer reviewers. Papers are welcome from authors outside of the Pacific Northwest if the topic is suitable to our regional audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信