《寻找西雅牟尼:现代日本佛教形成中的南亚》,Richard M.Jaffe著(综述)

Pub Date : 2021-11-12 DOI:10.1353/jas.2020.0039
J. Ketelaar
{"title":"《寻找西雅牟尼:现代日本佛教形成中的南亚》,Richard M.Jaffe著(综述)","authors":"J. Ketelaar","doi":"10.1353/jas.2020.0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Published by the Harvard-Yenching Institute HJAS 80.2 (2020): 526–532 nothing to our understanding of the narratives’ religious meaning. So, why bother? However, let this quibble not detract from my overwhelmingly positive evaluation of Ter Haar’s work. This book will be an inspiration for research in much wider fields of Chinese religious history, and it sets the standard for all future studies in the narrower sector of Lord Guan’s cult. It is not a conclusive study, but it opens up many new important vistas from which scholars may view and investigate beliefs and practices surrounding Lord Guan. Aside from post-1949 developments, I am thinking here in particular of the many themes touched on in this rich work that invite further study, including the still-puzzling question of Lord Guan’s function as god of wealth as well as the intertextual relationships of the nineteenth-century scriptures that integrate concepts from so-called “sectarian” textual traditions. Finally, for anyone interested in the interplay of written and oral traditions in premodern China, this work offers much stimulation through its empirical data, its finely honed argumentation, and its methodological reflexivity.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seeking Śākyamuni: South Asia in the Formation of Modern Japanese Buddhism by Richard M. Jaffe (review)\",\"authors\":\"J. Ketelaar\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jas.2020.0039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Published by the Harvard-Yenching Institute HJAS 80.2 (2020): 526–532 nothing to our understanding of the narratives’ religious meaning. So, why bother? However, let this quibble not detract from my overwhelmingly positive evaluation of Ter Haar’s work. This book will be an inspiration for research in much wider fields of Chinese religious history, and it sets the standard for all future studies in the narrower sector of Lord Guan’s cult. It is not a conclusive study, but it opens up many new important vistas from which scholars may view and investigate beliefs and practices surrounding Lord Guan. Aside from post-1949 developments, I am thinking here in particular of the many themes touched on in this rich work that invite further study, including the still-puzzling question of Lord Guan’s function as god of wealth as well as the intertextual relationships of the nineteenth-century scriptures that integrate concepts from so-called “sectarian” textual traditions. Finally, for anyone interested in the interplay of written and oral traditions in premodern China, this work offers much stimulation through its empirical data, its finely honed argumentation, and its methodological reflexivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jas.2020.0039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jas.2020.0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

哈佛燕京研究所发表HJAS 80.2(2020):526–532与我们对叙事的宗教意义的理解无关。那么,为什么要麻烦呢?然而,让这个狡辩不要减损我对特尔·哈尔工作的压倒性积极评价。这本书将对更广泛的中国宗教史领域的研究产生启发,并为未来关崇拜这一狭窄领域的所有研究树立了标准。这不是一个结论性的研究,但它开辟了许多新的重要视角,学者们可以从中看待和调查关的信仰和实践。除了1949年后的发展,我在这里特别想到了这部丰富的作品中涉及的许多主题,这些主题值得进一步研究,包括关作为财神的功能这一仍然令人困惑的问题,以及十九世纪经典中融合了所谓“宗派”文本传统概念的互文关系。最后,对于任何对前现代中国书面和口头传统的相互作用感兴趣的人来说,这部作品通过其经验数据、精心打磨的论证和方法论的自反性提供了很多刺激。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Seeking Śākyamuni: South Asia in the Formation of Modern Japanese Buddhism by Richard M. Jaffe (review)
Published by the Harvard-Yenching Institute HJAS 80.2 (2020): 526–532 nothing to our understanding of the narratives’ religious meaning. So, why bother? However, let this quibble not detract from my overwhelmingly positive evaluation of Ter Haar’s work. This book will be an inspiration for research in much wider fields of Chinese religious history, and it sets the standard for all future studies in the narrower sector of Lord Guan’s cult. It is not a conclusive study, but it opens up many new important vistas from which scholars may view and investigate beliefs and practices surrounding Lord Guan. Aside from post-1949 developments, I am thinking here in particular of the many themes touched on in this rich work that invite further study, including the still-puzzling question of Lord Guan’s function as god of wealth as well as the intertextual relationships of the nineteenth-century scriptures that integrate concepts from so-called “sectarian” textual traditions. Finally, for anyone interested in the interplay of written and oral traditions in premodern China, this work offers much stimulation through its empirical data, its finely honed argumentation, and its methodological reflexivity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信