中国的封锁机制:不可靠实体名单

IF 1 Q2 LAW

Journal of International Trade Law and Policy Pub Date : 2020-11-04 DOI:10.1108/jitlp-08-2020-0048

Qingxiu Bu

{"title":"中国的封锁机制:不可靠实体名单","authors":"Qingxiu Bu","doi":"10.1108/jitlp-08-2020-0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to seek to break the deadlock of the current confrontations between the two powers.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe paper is comparative and theoretical.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings suggest that multinational corporations would be put between a rock and a hard place.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nOnly multi-pronged approaches could be viable to address the issue.\n","PeriodicalId":42719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Trade Law and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jitlp-08-2020-0048","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"China’s blocking mechanism: the unreliable entity list\",\"authors\":\"Qingxiu Bu\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jitlp-08-2020-0048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this paper is to seek to break the deadlock of the current confrontations between the two powers.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe paper is comparative and theoretical.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe findings suggest that multinational corporations would be put between a rock and a hard place.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nOnly multi-pronged approaches could be viable to address the issue.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":42719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Trade Law and Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jitlp-08-2020-0048\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Trade Law and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jitlp-08-2020-0048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Trade Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jitlp-08-2020-0048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

目的本文的目的是试图打破当前两个大国之间对抗的僵局。设计/方法论/方法这篇论文具有比较性和理论性。调查结果表明，跨国公司将处于进退两难的境地。独创性/价值只有多管齐下的方法才能解决这个问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

China’s blocking mechanism: the unreliable entity list

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to seek to break the deadlock of the current confrontations between the two powers. Design/methodology/approach The paper is comparative and theoretical. Findings The findings suggest that multinational corporations would be put between a rock and a hard place. Originality/value Only multi-pronged approaches could be viable to address the issue.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of International Trade Law and Policy LAW-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of International Trade Law and Policy is a peer reviewed interdisciplinary journal with a focus upon the nexus of international economic policy and international economic law. It is receptive, but not limited, to the methods of economics, law, and the social sciences. As scholars tend to read individual articles of particular interest to them, rather than an entire issue, authors are not required to write with full accessibility to readers from all disciplines within the purview of the Journal. However, interdisciplinary communication should be fostered where possible. Thus economists can utilize quantitative methods (including econometrics and statistics), while legal scholars and political scientists can invoke specialized techniques and theories. Appendices are encouraged for more technical material. Submissions should contribute to understanding international economic policy and the institutional/legal architecture in which it is implemented. Submissions can be conceptual (theoretical) and/or empirical and/or doctrinal in content. Topics of interest to the Journal are expected to evolve over time but include: -All aspects of international trade law and policy -All aspects of international investment law and policy -All aspects of international development law and policy -All aspects of international financial law and policy -Relationship between economic policy and law and other societal concerns, including the human rights, environment, health, development, and national security