{"title":"白色和波兰","authors":"Brian Porter-Szűcs","doi":"10.19195/prt.2022.1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2019, the New York Times launched a series of articles entitled “The 1619 Project,” which argued that we should reorient our understanding of American history by using as a starting point the year when the first African slaves were sold in the territory that would become the United States.1 Not surprisingly, Donald Trump immediately countered by sponsoring “The 1776 Project,” which attempts to position the libertarian right as the heir to a long tradition of American greatness.2 A furious battle over historical memory is now being fought around these two texts, with school districts mandating that one or the other be adopted into the curriculum, depending on the political orientation dominating in any particular district.3 This was the backdrop for me when I read Adam Leszczyński’s Ludowa historia Polski (“The People’s History of Poland”), so the book felt familiar even before I noticed the references to Howard Zinn’s (1980) A People’s History of the United States. The country of my birth and the country that I study as a historian are rarely so explicitly aligned. Both","PeriodicalId":36093,"journal":{"name":"Praktyka Teoretyczna","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whiteness and Polishness\",\"authors\":\"Brian Porter-Szűcs\",\"doi\":\"10.19195/prt.2022.1.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2019, the New York Times launched a series of articles entitled “The 1619 Project,” which argued that we should reorient our understanding of American history by using as a starting point the year when the first African slaves were sold in the territory that would become the United States.1 Not surprisingly, Donald Trump immediately countered by sponsoring “The 1776 Project,” which attempts to position the libertarian right as the heir to a long tradition of American greatness.2 A furious battle over historical memory is now being fought around these two texts, with school districts mandating that one or the other be adopted into the curriculum, depending on the political orientation dominating in any particular district.3 This was the backdrop for me when I read Adam Leszczyński’s Ludowa historia Polski (“The People’s History of Poland”), so the book felt familiar even before I noticed the references to Howard Zinn’s (1980) A People’s History of the United States. The country of my birth and the country that I study as a historian are rarely so explicitly aligned. Both\",\"PeriodicalId\":36093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Praktyka Teoretyczna\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Praktyka Teoretyczna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2022.1.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praktyka Teoretyczna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2022.1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2019年,《纽约时报》发表了一系列题为“1619计划”的文章,认为我们应该重新定位对美国历史的理解,以第一批非洲奴隶在后来成为美国的领土上被贩卖的那一年为起点。1毫不奇怪,唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)立即发起了“1776计划”(The 1776 Project),试图将自由主义右翼定位为美国伟大悠久传统的继承人,这是我读亚当·莱斯钦斯基(Adam Leszczyński)的《波兰人民史》(Ludowa historia Polski)时的背景,所以这本书在我注意到霍华德·津恩(Howard Zinn)(1980)的《美国人民史》之前就感觉很熟悉。我出生的国家和我作为历史学家研究的国家很少如此明确地一致。二者都
In 2019, the New York Times launched a series of articles entitled “The 1619 Project,” which argued that we should reorient our understanding of American history by using as a starting point the year when the first African slaves were sold in the territory that would become the United States.1 Not surprisingly, Donald Trump immediately countered by sponsoring “The 1776 Project,” which attempts to position the libertarian right as the heir to a long tradition of American greatness.2 A furious battle over historical memory is now being fought around these two texts, with school districts mandating that one or the other be adopted into the curriculum, depending on the political orientation dominating in any particular district.3 This was the backdrop for me when I read Adam Leszczyński’s Ludowa historia Polski (“The People’s History of Poland”), so the book felt familiar even before I noticed the references to Howard Zinn’s (1980) A People’s History of the United States. The country of my birth and the country that I study as a historian are rarely so explicitly aligned. Both